This week on my podcast, I read my recent @Medium column, "View a SKU: Let’s Make Amazon Into a Dumb Pipe," about how interop can help us demonopolize Amazon and tame its market power:
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
To explain this proposal, I need to start with an axiom: there are lots of problems with Amazon (lots!) but the fact that Amazon is really convenient is *not* one of those problems. 3/
Your use of Amazon isn't a mark of your "laziness" anymore than your consumption of plastics is a mark of your indifference to the planet.
As @ZephyrTeachout writes in her stupendous book *Break 'Em Up*:
"I like supporting local retail for shopping whenever possible. 4/
"But I will not shame people for buying from Amazon the magic markers they use to write 'Break up Bezos’ power' on a big poster they parade outside their state attorney general’s office." 5/
The drive to "shop local" is great, but it shouldn't become a hairshirt. If you buy something from Amazon, it doesn't necessarily mean that you support union-busting, monopolization and creepy surveillance doorbells. 6/
It might just mean that you are out of time and live in a place where Amazon killed most of the retail that survived Walmart. 7/
If you've enjoyed @MattBors's work, you understand this. It's the essence of the #MrGotcha gag. A downtrodden peasant says, "We should improve society somewhat" and Mr Gotcha replies, "Yet you participate in society, curious! I am very intelligent."
The fact that Amazon has given us a single database in which you can search for a large slice of all the objects of retail commerce, read reviews, and explore alternatives is good, actually. 9/
The *problem* is in how Amazon abuses its workforce, crams its suppliers, self-preferences its own goods, and shifts wealth from taxpaying local businesses to its tax-evading coffers. 10/
The same politics and economics that have made it so hard *not* to use Amazon have also made working people much poorer, both in terms of money and time. 11/
It's not reasonable to expect people who are piecing together a living from three or four casualized jobs and paying sky-high pump prices to spend hours driving around looking for a local merchant to buy a specific widget at. 12/
But what if we could make shopping locally - where a local alternative existed - *easier* than shopping at Amazon? What if we could actually turn Amazon into a tool for finding goods at local merchants? 13/
That's where my proposal comes in. It was inspired by #LibraryExtension, a browser plugin that notices if you're looking at a book on Amazon and adds a "Reserve at your local library" button to the page, over the "Add to your cart" button.
That's when someone adds features to an existing product or service without permission from the company that made it - like an ad-blocker that changes the websites you look at to make them better for you.
Library Extension works as well as it does because books all share a common set of unique identifiers: the #ISBN, which is easy to detect on a webpage and also easy to look up in a database of library books. Shared identifiers make cross-referencing easy. 17/
As it happens, Amazon has assigned unique identifiers to virtually anything you might want to buy: the #ASIN (Amazon Standard Identification Number). What if a co-op created a database that cross-referenced ASINs with other inventory numbers (like UPCs and SKUs)? 18/
We could offer inventory control system plug-ins to merchants that automatically listed their inventory in a central, co-operatively managed database of what was for sale, where. 19/
Then, users who wanted to shop locally could install a Library Extension-like browser plugin that did a quick lookup whenever they browsed an Amazon product page. 20/
If the product was for sale locally, replace the "Add to Cart" button with a "Buy from local store" one, which would automatically process a payment to the local merchant using a payment method stored in your browser (no need to set up a separate account for every merchant). 21/
Likewise, we could expand Library Extension to add a "Buy from @bookshop_org" button to every book page, and a "Buy from @librofm" button to every audiobook page.
In other words, we could turn Amazon into a dumb pipe: a commodity catalog with reviews and recommendations. 22/
The conversion of centralized services into dumb pipes is a time-honored tradition, as @DavidIsen wrote in his classic 1998 @TheOfficialACM paper:
Now, *could* we do this? As a technical matter, sure. A lot would depend on adapting small businesses' inventory control systems, but the vendors behind those systems would benefit from participating in those adaptations, as would their customers. 24/
What about as a legal matter? Well, #IANAL, but...
* Your browser is yours. Adapting the pages you're served to suit you is unambiguously lawful, as are the tools to do so. Hence the rise of ad-blockers, "the biggest boycott in world history":
* The ASIN database is a collection of factual identifiers; the USA has (wisely) not adopted the #DatabaseRight that the EU got suckered into, so databases of factual identifiers are not copyrightable:
* Amazon's terms of service ban you from doing this kind of thing, but US federal judges are increasingly skeptical of attempts to block scraping public information through terms of service:
Note that executing this plan won't solve *the* Amazon problem, but it will solve *an* Amazon problem. 28/
It's no substitute for other forms of antitrust enforcement (bans on self-preferencing, forced selloffs of anticompetitive acquisitions, merger scrutiny) but it is *faster* than those things, and will deliver immediate relief to shoppers and small businesses. 29/
That's the kind of #TechExceptionalism I'm completely here for. The breakup of the Bell System took 69 years, all told. We don't want to wait 69 years before we blunt Amazon's monopoly power:
This is why #BigTech is the natural starting place for antitrust: because Big Tech is built atop general purpose computers that can be rendered interoperable, regulators seeking to limit Big Tech power have unique, powerful additions to their to toolkits. 31/
I know that some of my comrades-in-arms are skeptical of Big Tech antitrust, correctly asserting that other monopolies (like telecoms and entertainment companies) are also corrupt monopolies in sore need of antitrust attention. 32/
I want to break those companies' corporate power, too! In fact, my next book is all about limiting the power of tech and entertainment judges to screw creative workers:
But these fast-acting interoperability remedies make Big Tech the natural place to start - the vanguard for the anti-monopoly fights we'll have to bring to every sector, from cheerleading uniforms to beer, from finance to international shipping:
Taming Big Tech is where we start, not where we end. It's the orchard with the most low-hanging fruit. Racking up victories against Big Tech will create the political will and the movement power to go after all those other monopolies:
It costs a *lot* to win a US election - even if it's just a race for (formerly) low-stakes offices that have emerged as culture-war battlegrounds (like school and election boards). 1/
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
In the 12 years since *Citizens United*, the dark money firehose has turned many races into plute-on-plute economic warfare, where cash from the 1% matters far more than votes from the 99%. 3/