In the first half of 2022, builders started construction on 2,317 units of housing in Minneapolis. That's *on pace* for the city's second best year of housing production in many decades, only behind 2019.
The city's massive backlog of approvals is moving from paper to concrete.
In contrast, housing production absolutely cratered in St. Paul through the first half of 2022, with only 342 units started. The city is on pace for its worst year since 2017.
I think we can call it; there's no other explanation but the rent control ordinance for this collapse.
Here's the 12 month moving average of housing starts for both cities in the past decade:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Alright, it's time for my annual rundown of the year's worst tweets. A bunch of people do similar lists these days, as far as I'm concerned, the more the merrier.
For reference, here's my compilation from last year:
So to start, I want to celebrate the contributions of former USMC officer, UN weapons inspector, convicted sex offender, and RT correspondent Scott Ritter.
Before being banned, nobody was more confidently wrong about the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Hard to pick just four, but:
There were a lot of bad tweets about Ukraine, or adjacent subjects this year. It was hard to pick one from Hanania, in particular, who rivaled Ritter for wrongness.
The Minnesota Supreme Court was extremely stupid to open the door to assessing comprehensive plans based on their "full build-out," seemingly not understanding that a zoning envelope provides for flexibility and does not prescribe maximum use.
However—
—the Appellate Court decision today is correct to notice that the District Court order enjoining the Minneapolis 2040 plan and reinstating the previous comprehensive plan did not make any attempt to verify that the prior plan was better for the environment (it was not).
Not a lawyer, but it seems to me that this should re-open the door for the City to challenge the myopic analysis by the fake environmental groups suing to block the plan, something it failed to do the first time.
In such a way, the court *could* back into the correct decision.