For today's #MakeAPlanet quiz, rank these fossil sizes from smallest to largest:
1) Wingspan of Meganeura, a Carboniferous dragonfly
2) Shoulder height of Hyracotherium, the first horse
3) Beak-to-tail length of Archaeopteryx
4) Length of a ("Giant Claw") Therizinosaurus claw
This question comes from the ideas we have about the past -- and the scale of ancient organisms, which may loom large (or small!) in our minds. I'm much more interested in what you think (or feel) the answer to be, based on your imagination. I don't expect most people to know!
This one was less popular for some reason -- not relatable enough? Too nerdy? Too left-field? Too late in the day? Too Monday?
Before I go through these one by one, the usual disclaimer that these are fossil organisms, which almost certainly varied in size, yadda yadda. Also, archaeopteryx didn't have a beak (as was assumed until about the early 90's), it had toothy snout.
Our smallest unit would be the snoot-to-tail length of archaeopteryx, a raven-sized dinosaur-bird of around 20". Its weight probably clocked in at just around 2 lbs!
Next-smallest is Hyracotherium, the "dawn horse." (Note: horse evolution is tricky and fossil taxonomy is a mess, but AMNH still lists this as the first horse, so that's what we're going with). They were dog-sized; only about 1-2 feet high at the shoulder (depending on species).
Clocking in with a wingspan of up to 30", the early dragonfly Meganeura is our third-largest span in the list! This Carboniferous predator was the largest known insect in the fossil record.
But none of these prehistoric beasts' lengths could top that of a single Therizinosaurus claw, which were a whopping one meter (3.3 feet) long! They didn't name it "great claw" for nothing. Inspiration for Freddy Krueger, maybe?
Wish you could daydream about incredible creatures from vanished worlds during that Monday Zoom that could have been an email? Support @MakeAPlanetPod! We'll always have your back*.
For today’s #MakeAPlanet quiz, lets zoom in on what we now call North America. Only one of these mammals evolved here; the others dispersed over land bridges long ago. Which species actually got its start on this continent?
A) Porcupines
B) Bison 🦬
C) Opossums
D) Horses🐴
Deep time—a phrase coined by the writer John McPhee to refer to the vastness of geologic time—shakes up, challenges, and expands so many preconceived ideas about nature. That’s one reason I love it so much.
Answer time! I really love the conversation and thought processes that went into folks' answers. The goal of these quizzes is to get people thinking, wondering, and learning.
So first, let's talk about what DIDN'T originate, evolutionarily speaking, in North America.
I helped start @OurWarmRegards-- one of the very first climate podcasts-- back in 2016. We were all volunteers, and while I love the show, it definitely showed. For our last season, we leveled up with industry-standard production quality, but zero budget. It wasn't sustainable.
Big networks started climate shows, and we just couldn't compete with ads in Madison Square Garden. Numbers dropped off during the pandemic, even though it was (in my opinion) our best season, by far. We were working ten times as hard for less than half the downloads.
It’s time for today’s #MakeAPlanet quiz! Which set of phenomena were closest in time?
1) T. Rex — Stegosaurus
2) First unicellular life — First multicellular life
3) The ☄️ that killed the dinosaurs — Neanderthals
4) Trilobites first appeared — Trilobites went extinct
Y’all put your time travel caps on today!
So, what’s the answer? Let’s go one by one: The first evidence of life we have in the fossil record dates back about 3.5 billion years ago, only (!) a billion years after Earth formed.
Multicellular life, with its increased complexity?
Really tired of climate edge-lords blaming decades of climate inaction on scientists and not carbon-intensive industries for buying politicians and spending billions on disinformation campaigns, or corporate media for being silent until the last few years.
This is also very closely related to a sort of "if you open your eyes to the real truth, you'll know we're doomed" kind of machismo that I find is prevalent among a lot Twitter dudes who have strong opinions but shallow CVs when it comes to expertise or effort.
Why mostly men? @TricksyRaccoon and I have this conversation a lot but I think it has something to do with the fact that uncertainty is hard for a lot of people, especially people who have never had to really fight for anything. There's a certain kind of control in giving up.
"What if your aborted fetus had grown up to be a scientist, or even the next Darwin?"
Aside from the fact that this scenario could just as easily go the other way (baby Hitler/Stalin/Mao!), it's so revealing that these dudes care more about a hypothetical than a living person.
If they do actually care about this hypothetical, possible future scientist, why wouldn't they also care about me as an actual living breathing scientist? What if I'm the next Darwin (I'm not trying to self-aggrandize, I'm just playing along with their hypothetical)?
I've had a lot of emails from men who read my abortion story in Nature in the last week, and the pattern is always: why are you thinking of yourself instead of 1) future possible scientists, or 2) the elderly who need grandkids, or 3) me, who could have been aborted but wasn't.
There’s a new study out reporting a massive societal decline in plant awareness, based on the decline in the availability of plant courses in the UK. But…: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
Spending any amount of time on TikTok reveals that younger generations are extremely into 🌻. Some of the most-followed accounts I’ve seen are related to 🌳, foraging, house plants, urban gardening, 🍄, and field botany! So while formal 🪴education may be rare, 🌱 love is not.
This gives me a lot of hope, and I think universities and nature centers should be supporting the plant love boom (bloom?).
(I know fungi are not plants, but many are plant partners, and fungi are often included in botany education programs.)