How about I describe my experience in the @TED Residency, when its billionaire funder, @ruthannharnisch of the @harnischfound told me I was "a destructive force in a world you hoped to improve" And I should "Disable [my] socials until you get the help you need."
An hour later, my ex, @MegRhi texted me, asking me to have Ruth Ann stop texting her employer's board members, as though I could stop a billionaire on a rampage
It's ok that none of this means anything. But it nearly killed me. And I will hold onto the terror and pain I felt forever. @CyndiStivers is complicit.
After learning that I'm not the only one who was left at the brink by Ruth Ann's rage, I have quietly spent the past 5 years warning other disabled folks who could cross her path about her. But I'm ready to start talking about it in depth on this platform.
This is how I came to understand that David Walentas was gentrifying philanthropy. I experienced Ruth Ann Harnisch buying me and others up, for a minimal sum, as though we were some sort of investment property to be acquired. eejackson.medium.com/philanthropic-…
Anyway, I've been doing what I did since that day I provoked her ire. And what I have come to realize is that I wasn't a destructive force in a world I had hoped to improve. I was a destructive force in a world SHE hoped I would improve.
And my god, I want to destroy the shit out of that world. #EatTheRich
It has taken years, but one of my proudest accomplishments is being the only person (I'm aware of) to get kicked out of the TED Residency. I now wear it as a badge of honor.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's start with what @may_gun wrote about the abled POV. This 'Partner Content' features 3 students, all identified as recent graduates of CCS, their research rhetorically professionalized. How, then is the disabled person described?
Researchers are not taught about the pressure research subjects feel to create a tangible problem where none may exist. I am inclined to believe this anecdote was a response to the research subject wanting to be useful to a naive researcher.
This is strange. Usually when parents are mentioned, it means parents of disabled children. But that’s not the case here. Disabled people were clearly testers. No mention of disabled folks having agency or decision making power. Segmenting us with children is infantilizing.
If we are going to have a conversation about disability and Lockheed Martin, we cannot brush over DisabilityIN's role in awarding them a best place to work, with a perfect, 100 disability inclusion rating, year after year.
I’m sounding an alarm here. Please pay attention. Microsoft is partnering with the World Bank to extract data (and labor) from disabled people, while failing to center disabled people in policy decisions about how that data will be used. Help me demand answers to two questions:
1. How many unaffiliated disabled people were a) in the room at all, and 2. How were their insights taken into account when this ‘Data Hub’ was being workshopped?
I’m telling you, if we don’t hit the brakes on this ASAP, it’s going to further marginalize a lot of disabled folks under the guise of bridging the disability divide.
Thinking about how terms like mapping and project are used in design for social innovation programs, and how easily they get taken up to cause harm. [ID: screenshot of a Twitter account called the Gender Mapping Project. The tagline reads no human is born in the wrong body]
Also thinking about who these programs employ and how susceptible faculty is to feeling inspired by such a message as ‘no human is born in the wrong body’ and how it’s up to the harmed students to explain what it’s really saying.
Everything about this screams grad school thesis to me. And what is the program going to do? Fail the student because their social innovation is hateful or pass them because they applied the language, ideas, and methods they were taught?
Wondering if we’re past corporate inclusive design announcement season. Notable announcements include Microsoft, Reebok/Zappos, CVS, Skims (Kim Kardashian’s ‘shapewear’ brand), Starbucks, and Apple. Also pay attention to how many of these brands are actively union busting.