Scott Kominers Profile picture
Aug 3 26 tweets 19 min read
If NFTs are all about enabling ownership, then why would creators choose to give away intellectual property rights through creative commons licensing (cc0)? 🤔❓❔❓

@flashrekt and I explain in a new @a16z crypto article: a16zcrypto.com/cc0-nft-creati…

🧵👇
"Open-sourcing" IP opens it up to experimentation and recombination – which can sometimes grow its value! a16zcrypto.com/cc0-nft-creati…
@XCOPYART went the cc0 route with “Right-click and Save As Guy” and inspired TONS of derivatives.

And just this week, they went even further, declaring an intention to go “all in” on cc0:

Why are so many NFT creators going down the “no rights” path?
Adopting the Creative Commons Zero (cc0) license gives everyone the right to adapt and build upon IP (without fear of legal consequences).

This jumpstarts meme-ability by actively inviting the creation of derivative works. creativecommons.org/share-your-wor…
Just as smart contracts are composable "building blocks" that can be stacked and remixed to create richer applications, NFTs and their underlying smart contracts can act as a base-layer foundation for culture and creativity to recombine and interconnect. niftypins.io/loot-nft/
@dhof’s cc0 @lootproject for example, started with a series of “Loot bag” NFTs, each comprising just a simple list of "adventure items" such as Loot Bag #5726's "Katana, Divine Robe, Great Helm, Wool Sash, Divine Slippers, Chain Gloves, Amulet, Gold Ring." opensea.io/assets/ethereu… Image
Creators from all over have contributed derivatives to the "Lootverse:" games (@LootRealms; @TheCryptGame), characters (@GenesisLoot; @hyperloot_; @LootExplorers), storytelling (@BannersNft; @OpenQuill), and even leveling infrastructure (@LootRift).
For NFT projects that are trying to build novel brands, these sorts of derivatives can be a win-win for all.

Derivatives borrow some brand awareness from the source project; their creation and sharing can later drive new interest in the original.
If you see someone wearing @nounsvision glasses on the street (or in a Super Bowl commercial), you might want to get a pair of your own – but you also might become interested in buying an original @nounsdao NFT or some other related derivative.
Similarly with for the "blitcap" hat, which is available in physical and on @0xTajigen characters – both a nod to a trait in the @chain_runners collection, which itself introduced the trait in homage to @blitmap's Logo. Image
cc0 allows this to happen with the explicit permission of the original creators – thus giving an NFT's enthusiast community a *literal license to build* new value layers whenever they want –

"transform[ing] an adversarial game into a co-operative one"
This can work particularly well with NFTs because ownership enables people to internalize the results of the co-creation through the value that accrues to their assets and contributions – and that in turn incentivizes them to participate in co-creation in the first place.
But it's not enough to simply build cc0 and assume "they will come" – derivatives don't magically appear! There are factors that help here: a16zcrypto.com/cc0-nft-creati…

As with open-source software, cc0 NFTs work best where there is potential for a rich, expanded ecosystem.
Examples: Loot bags are basic primitives that make sense for all kinds of adventure settings; the Nouns brand is as intuitive for a beer ad as for physical glasses; and the @goblintown art style looks good on everything from @Dirt_Birds_NFT to @valkilmer.
As a business professor, I'd be remiss if I didn't mention business models:

Because cc0 projects typically earn royalties from secondary sales, third-party expansions and derivatives can also become sources of revenue, as they drive increased demand for the original cc0 assets.
And cc0 licensing reduces friction that might otherwise stop brand-reinforcing extensions from being created – or worse, lead to them in a way that bypasses the original, as @tshirtbob_ recently explained in the context of his cc0 @acommonplacenft:
All of that said, cc0 isn't a one-size fits all solution – the right IP model depends on your strategy and goals. Brands that are already well-established, for example, might opt for more restrictive licenses as a way of protecting their existing IP and reinforcing exclusivity.
But for some projects, at least, cc0 licensing is an incredibly compelling way to kickstart IP that may one day take on a life of its own.

Intrigued? Full article is here: a16zcrypto.com/cc0-nft-creati…
As the NFT space continues to evolve, we expect to see more infrastructure and design patterns supporting cc0 efforts, as well as innovation around value capture. It's also likely we'll see creators develop completely novel rights&licensing models.

QED. a16zcrypto.com/cc0-nft-creati…
And on a personal note: shoutouts to @flashrekt – he's one of the first friends I made entirely through the NFT space, and I've learned so much from him. Such an honor to have had the opportunity to collaborate on this piece 🙏🙌
Disclosures: @a16z, @flashrekt, and I hold a number of cc0 and other NFTs, including some from collections mentioned here and in the article…
… plus @flashrekt is a member of @c0c0dao and @sharkdao
… and I advise marketplace businesses, startups, and crypto projects, and also serve as an expert on NFT-related matters, including regarding questions related to IP strategy.
(For full disclosure statement, see the article a16zcrypto.com/cc0-nft-creati….)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Kominers

Scott Kominers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @skominers

Jun 10
1/ Here’s a (seeming) paradox: If digital space is infinitely expansible, then how can there be scarcity? And how should builders and users think about the value of digital land and other spaces in the metaverse? 🧵👇
2/ In an @a16z crypto article last week, I argued that the old IRL mantra of “location location location” also applies in the context of web3 platforms, where individuals can uniquely own scarce locations for private or shared use. a16zcrypto.com/metaverse-real…
TL;DR: It matters which metaverse location you own! (The spaces themselves are non-fungible in that sense.)
Read 26 tweets
May 21
In our @HarvardBiz article last week, @Jad_AE and I discussed not only the value web3 provides [], but also how it may (and may not) change business strategy.

(thread 👇)
Today's dominant internet platforms are built on aggregating users (and their data!) to harness network effects – a key source of competitive advantage. [hbr.org/2019/01/why-so…]

BUT...
... how does competitive advantage work in the more open, user-focused ethos of web3 – where, for instance, users can own their digital assets, which are typically created according to interoperable standards on public blockchains (instead of on a company's private servers)?
Read 13 tweets
May 16
Why build in web3? @Jad_AE and I explain in @HarvardBiz: hbr.org/2022/05/why-bu…

The "web3 way" – building open platforms that directly share value with users – can create more value for everyone, including the platforms(!).

How so?

Thread 🧵👇
(1) The ability to plug into open content networks and integrate pre-existing digital assets can help new platforms resolve the classic "cold-start problem" – and expand existing platforms' surface reach and content potential. hbr.org/2022/05/why-bu…
(2) The infrastructure layer web3 runs on – public ledgers that make clear which digital assets exist and who owns what – significantly lowers the cost of creating user trust: hbr.org/2022/05/why-bu…
Read 23 tweets
Nov 27, 2021
See this headline? It's from October 2020.

Sound eerily similar to what's going on right now, a year later? Yep.

I really wish the US had worked harder to fight the virus, both at home and abroad 🙁
Quick follow-up note because I've already gotten a query:

To me, "fighting the virus" means not just producing vaccines (which we didn't do enough of!) but also engaging in the outreach necessary to distribute them and convince people to take them (worldwide!)...
... plus building consensus and producing clear guidelines around the importance of non-pharmaceutical interventions like masking, and then undertaking the work of educating people about these efforts and getting them to participate...
Read 10 tweets
Nov 10, 2021
Thrilled to have a piece with @NFTbark in @HarvardBiz today explaining why we think NFTs are real and here to stay.

The piece features art by @VinnieHager, along with @BoredApeYC, @RealSupDucks, and @GutterCatGang.

Thread below 👇 hbr.org/2021/11/how-nf…
First, in addition to the featured art, shoutouts to @dapperlabs, @nbatopshot, @thehundreds, @AdamBombSquad, @jenkinsthevalet, @poapxyz, @koodos, and @beeple, who are mentioned (plus @MaisonDeGOAT, @TwoBitBears, @infinites_ai, and @_GRADIS_ in the links)! hbr.org/2021/11/how-nf…
Now: What's the big deal with NFTs? hbr.org/2021/11/how-nf…
Read 59 tweets
Sep 28, 2021
My column today in @bopinion: The world can have vaccine boosters and first doses, too – the key is to explicitly contract on expanding production capacity: bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
This is closely related to arguments colleagues (including Castillo, @Susan_Athey, @AW_Baker, @ebudish, @rglenner, Kremer, @JeanNahraeLee, Prendergast, @ATabarrok) and I made earlier in the pandemic in support of "push" contracts for vaccine procurement: science.org/doi/full/10.11…
If we expand capacity, this increases total production throughput. And even if initial booster doses come out of global supply, increased production enables other countries to catch up – in the long run, speeding up global vaccination. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(