People always say the vacant home issue is a myth, because "everyone would rather collect rent!"

Not true. Central banks & governments distorted markets so much, it's worse to have tenants.

Here's what investment firms think. You'll be outraged in a few tweets.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ Capital is so cheap & plentiful, appreciation ripped higher. Countries like 🇨🇦 & the 🇺🇸 have access to capital cheaper than the rate of inflation.

Now you might not have access to that capital, but hedgefunds and institutions do. Heck, it's sometimes from your pension & bank
3/ That's important for understanding there's no rush for these companies. But why not collect rent in the meantime?

To understand this you need to understand how rental real estate is valued. There's two popular ways:
- the income approach
- gross rent multiplier

Quick intro
4/ Valuing commercial real estate by the income approach:

Net operating income (NOI): *stable* rent to be collected less expenses

Cap rate: generally the percent of rent valued in the market at that time.

(NOI) / (cap rate) = value
5/ If you collect $100k/year in NOI and other buildings are selling with 2% cap rates, your value:

$100k/0.02 = $5 million building.

Pretty easy so far, right? Hey, look at you. You're almost a real estate investment genius.
6/ The gross rent multiplier:

Gross rent (GR): rent collected before deducting expenses, unlike NOI.

Rent multiplier (RM): the multiple buildings are selling for in the hood.

(GR) * (RM) = Value

This is dry, but it's about to kick you in the gut in a couple tweets.
7/ So let's say a building sold that was collecting $200k gross rent and sold for a valuation of $1m. The rent multiplier is 5.

Now you find a building with $100k in gross rent down the street.

($100k) * 5 = $500k value building.
8/ the part most people miss is valuation isn't based on the rent you collect, but the *market value* that can be collected.

Your 70-year-old landlord probably knows you a little, and isn't trying to kick you out. Probably renting to you for 50% of market value.
9/ now the hedgefund with an office on Bay St, managing money from Hong Kong and apartments in Halifax? They have no idea who you are, you're just an input in a spread sheet.

They're also just getting more capital and are forced to allocate and buy buildings or lose it.
10/ Current landlord might be collecting $100k/year NOI, when the market of all units would be $200k/year. The problem is you get a building full of tenants.

Often these tenants are tricky to move, especially if they're middle or upper class. So obvs they buy working class ones
11/ Remember, it's market rent you CAN COLLECT. The old landlord might think turnover rate is low, so they'll accept a discount.

An investment firm thinks: What are all the loopholes so we can replace the tenants? They hire lawyers and scrap with them.
12/ Working class people don't have many resources & get booted out often without the proper reason.

One firm in Toronto went to immigrants that didn't speak english & promised them a bigger apartment for the same price if they terminated their lease. That apt never came.
13/ More often it's renovation. They make it uncomfortable with perpetual renovation & people move.

Some buildings only have 20% or so turn over rate, but if you REALLY want you can have almost all leave.

There are quite a few examples of this across Canada.
14/ Now the problem is you can't do that every year, so they keep them vacant. If property is rising 20-30% per year because of gov stimulus, you don't want new tenants that are locked into 2-3% rent increases every year. So now let's look at the valuation.
15/ Let's run two scenarios on a building over 5 years. Both gets new tenants producing $200k NOI w/ 2% yield.

Tenanted building has 2% rent hikes making NOI $216.5k in year 5.

Your investment:
- value: ($216.5k) / 0.02 = $10.8m
- 5 years of NOI: $1.04m

Value is $11.84m.
16/ But let's say it's vacant. Market rent that can be collected rises with the market with full realization, and rents are rising 10% y/y

Year 5 possible NOI is $292.8k

- 5 years of NOI collected: 0.
- value: ($292.8k) / 0.02 = $14.64m

You made $2.78m more doing nothing.
17/

the kicker is:
- you're helping to increase rents (there's no vacancies!)
- your NOI would be higher because you didn't have to deal with anything but security.

No one in their right mind would collect rent unless they had to focus on cashflow positive operations.
18/ But that's the beauty of the market since 2008 — rates are so low no one needs cashflow, they borrow against the asset or people seeking higher returns give the cash.

At 6% interest, it's hard to do. At 2% interest it's a walk in the park... filled with tent cities.
19/ That's before the gov programs to subsidize the renovations & REITs tax advantages.

It's really quite amazing. Either we elect the biggest predators or the dumbest people.

Incentives are stacked towards people like me explaining this to investors instead of gov.

</thread>
Before someone says I’m anti-investment, it should be pretty obvious I understand capital markets and real estate because I’m pro-investment.

I’m just pro-HEALTHY investment. We pretended it was the best economy ever post-2008, while helicoptering money like it was collapsed.
We complain about low inflation so rates can’t rise, not realizing inflation is low because people divert funds to non-productive asset debt servicing.

Of course inflation is low, the prime demographic of spender is 20-40 year olds & they’re spending all their money on shelter.
Also tagging commercial real estate genius @JShamess for a fact check, since someone will say I’m “anti-RE”

Yes, I’m anti-real estate. Just like Godzilla. Obvs.

Here’s an actual photo of me from 2017, when the mortgage lobby said I was going to cause a recession.
"there's no vacancies!"

No idea if this company is doing the same thing (@Martine_August would know better than me) but it wouldn't surprise me.

Low rates mean capital costs are so low there's no rush, which is why it leads to these social distortions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Punwasi 🌋 🚀

Stephen Punwasi 🌋 🚀 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @StephenPunwasi

Aug 2
I've heard many shocking things I'm skeptical about this year, but this one takes the cake.

... artificial banana flavor, like the flavor of that nasty penicillin, is how bananas used to taste.

quick thread 🧵👇
2/ Up until the 1950s, the prominent type of banana for export was the Gros Michel, aka Fat Mikes.

Shipping was primitive and slow, so it was ideal with a thick skin that didn't bruise easily.

It's a sweet and creamy banana. Most banana-flavored candies taste like them.
3/ Then Panama disease hit south American plantations. It's a fungus that destroyed basically all commercial crops in the 1950s, and often considered one of the worst botanical epidemics of all time.

They found the Cavendish was resistant to this strain, so they replaced it.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 1
Whaaat? 🤯

Remember when I said @PierrePoilievre is hitting the points young people want & the NDP will lose them if Singh keeps repeating nonsense?

I'm pretty good at forecasting sentiment but I didn't see 18-29 year old voters shifting this fast.
2/ Young adults are finding out poverty is defined as a money issue, but the system has been manipulated to the point money doesn't matter.

They got degrees, some became doctors. They're making $200k and still can't afford the lifestyle someone earning $40k could 7 years ago.
3/ Plutocrats and even the privileged middle class don't realize that caring about big issues like climate change is a privilege.

If you're barely squeezing by and don't have secure shelter — you don't have time for a lecture on why you should pay more for gas.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 28
Happy Great Upheaval Day!

Who wants a history lesson you won’t see as a Heritage Minute anytime soon?

Here’s a story on a little-known holiday that exists in 🇨🇦 due to an 🇺🇸 forcing the Queen to do something they refuse to with slavery — acknowledge their role.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ In 1713 the UK took control of Acadia, around the Maritimes. Some Acadians refused to sign oaths of loyalty to the British, believing they would be forced to fight in their military.

Acadians largely engaged in diplomacy at this point, so many reluctantly signed to avoid war
3/ The British being the British, didn’t like the idea of diplomacy.

They sieged a key passage, burnt down their houses down, killed thousands, gave their land to settlers, & the Monarchy issued an order to deport as many as they can to the 13 colonies.
Read 6 tweets
Jul 28
A lot of people still think real estate is hot because rents are rising and it's just a temporary downturn.

Great narrative and investors repeating it better hope no one realizes what's actually happening, because if the average person realizes this they're f*cked.

<thread>🧵👇
2/ Smart investors & landlords calculate their return based on the yield. Take in more than you spend. Simple.

Over the past 2 years, everyone became a negative cash flow landlord. I call these speculords — they're speculating on value.
3/ Speculords are gamblers, hoping the price of an asset appreciates sufficiently to cover their costs and create a profit.

At the peak, homes were rising $30k/month, even though they weren't collecting enough rent to cover the mortgage.
Read 15 tweets
Jul 21
Hey Millennials 👋

Let's talk about one of the biggest drivers of inequality — monetary policy.

Everyone wants to talk about interest rates but many don't get the basics. Let's fix that with a 10,000 ft view of how this generational heist works.

<thread> 🧵👇
2/ Interest rates are the cost of capital. You got that much, I'm assuming. When they rise, borrowers pay more. They fall, borrowers pay less.

All stuff you know. But why do they rise and what are they hoping to do? Well, create and lower inflation.
3/ A central bank's primary role is to keep inflation low and stable. If it's too low, you risk deflation (falling prices).

If prices fall, the fear is people will wait to buy goods, the stores will close, the manufacturers won't sell anything, and the economy collapses
Read 10 tweets
Jul 20
Hilarious so many people think the Bank of Canada will cut rates for a recession.

I'm not saying they won't, it WOULD totally be what Tiff does because he's not capable of planning 18 months ahead, but here's why that's a funny take.

<thread> 🧵👇
1. They think a recession is bullish for real estate.

People don't seem to realize a real recession vs an induced one due to restricted output is different.

Incomes fall during recession, not rise due to government handouts.
2. Inflation: The BoC doesn't see inflation falling to target until 2024.

If they cut during a recession, you'll get higher prices, lower wages, lower employment, etc..

Things will get more expensive as things get worse, compounding recession issues.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(