1. I thought it useful to gather my thoughts and predictions for the US economy for the rest of the year. The usual caveat applies: there is a lot of uncertainty around them, but these are my best guesses. 1/9
2. Inflation will come down, probably more than many people expect. This reflects the sharp turns in some commodity prices, weakness in China, improvements in supply chains. There will be claims of victory (not by the Fed), but they will be wrong.
3. Inflation will however not come down anywhere close to the target level of 2%. This is because the inertial wage price interaction is now clearly in play and will not turn around any time soon. Thus, the Fed will have to continue to tighten.
4. The purpose of tightening is to decrease activity, and through this, put downward pressure on wage and price increases. Thus, the Fed will try to achieve a slowdown. It is already in play, even if the GDP numbers almost surely underestimate activity in the first two quarters.
5. While the focus has been on monetary policy, there is a substantial fiscal consolidation at work. The effect is smoothed as consumers built savings earlier and can now spend them. But it will play a role. The stronger the adverse effect,the less the Fed need to increase rates.
6. There is no such thing as a slowdown without an increase in unemployment. The hope of decreasing vacancies while leaving unemployment the same, which some officials at the Fed have suggested, is a vain hope. Vacancies will come down; unemployment will go up.
7. Whether or not this leads to a recession, i.e (true) negative growth, is a different issue. The slowdown in inflation may give room to the Fed to go slow and try to achieve lower but positive growth. As Jay Powell stated, it is hard to do it just right.
8. The economic picture at the time of the elections may not be too bad. Lower inflation, low but positive growth, still low unemployment. If so, this will help Democrats. But the hard job of getting inflation down all the way, or at least close to target, will remain.
9. When, some time next year, inflation gets down to 3%, there will be an intense discussion of whether it is worth slowing down activity further to get to 2%. The Fed may decide to state mission accomplished, and stay at 3%, if not forever, at least for a while.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Olivier Blanchard

Olivier Blanchard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ojblanchard1

Mar 13
1. During World war II, economists working for US military intelligence, and using analytical tools, identified how bombings should be chosen so as to have the maximum impact on production in Germany.
2. This implied identifying chains of production, and finding which inputs and intermediate products were essential to production, were hard to find alternatives for, and hard to replace. And then bombing particular plants.
3. The same approach should be followed in the choice of sanctions against Russia, obviously not through bombings, but through restrictions on exports to Russia. The list of exports is long and detailed. Some of the items are indeed more essential for production than others.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 1
100K followers… (although still no blue button ☹ ). My life’s goal is achieved… Maybe not...

A few reactions:

1. Twitter is chronophage. I have spent too much time strolling down threads that I should not have.
2. Twitter leads to witty tweets and faster reactions than desirable. One starts thinking in 280 character pieces (or 280 times n), which is not always best. My last tweet thread on the case of gas subsidies was an example of that.
3. Twitter need not lead to unpleasant or acrimonious exchanges. I have refrained from insulting anybody and I have not been insulted (much). When disagreements crop up, DMs are the better way to proceed.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 26
1. The war in Ukraine will to an increase in gas and oil prices. How much will depend on whether either Russia is willing to limit exports or the EU is willing to limit imports. For the moment, the effects are limited. They could get worse.
2. In normal times, the advice to Treasuries would be to let it happen and not try to offset it through subsidies and tax cuts; the advice to central banks would be to partly accommodate the higher inflation, in order to limit the adverse output effects.
3. This time is different. Advanced economies are already facing higher inflation; the question in the mind of people is whether this inflation will last or slowdown. If inflation were to further increase a lot, this would likely convince people that inflation is there to stay
Read 9 tweets
Oct 18, 2021
1. Inspired by today’s NYT headline “Biden’s Plans Raise Questions About What U.S. Can or Cannot Afford to Do”, and the Manchin type position. Essential to distinguish between spending and deficits. One does not imply the other. There should be two guiding principles:
1. Do any spending project which makes sense; to be nerdy about it: any project that has a risk adjusted social rate of return which exceeds the corresponding borrowing cost. (admittedly not an easy computation, but a needed one). By that metric, a lot needs to be done.
2.Then, decide on the mix of tax and deficit finance. Again, a complex decision, with many factors at play: If some of the spending pays for itself fiscally, do more deficit finance. If you want future generations to also pay for some of it, do more deficit finance.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 16, 2021
Struck by the importance of the collapse of networks in understanding major macro fluctuations. Three examples:
1. The collapse of production in the transition in Eastern Europe. Under central planning, production had been organized along single chains. During transition, if one link failed, the whole chain collapsed, and so did output.
2. The collapse of the financial system after Lehman.
Before Lehman, financial institutions knew about other financial institutions they did business with, but not with the financial institutions doing business with those institutions. hen one got in trouble, the system collapsed
Read 4 tweets
Jun 4, 2021
1. A very useful Vox EU e-book on monetary policy under covid, looking at central banks reactions in 8 advanced economies and 8 emerging markets, and drawing lessons for the future. bit.ly/34IsAxM.
2. My own contribution: An attempt to think about monetary policy if and when it becomes free of the zero lower bound and can adjust the policy rate as much as it deems necessary (I am not sure this will happen soon, but it is worth thinking about).
3. Of the innovations they have introduced, what should central banks keep and what should they shed? Some conclusions:
The case for dual targets, inflation/activity, is overwhelming. The case for extending the mandate, for example to include fighting global warming is weak.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(