Next Sat (Aug 13), I'm co-presenting a program item at @Defcon (Las Vegas) called "Literal Self-Pwning: Why Patients - and Their Advocates - Should Be Encouraged to Hack, Improve, and Mod Med Tech" with @CDameffMD & @jefftullymd:
My book "How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism" is a critique of Big Tech connecting conspiratorial thinking to the rise of tech monopolies (proposing a way to deal with both) is now out in paperback:
My ebooks and audiobooks (from @torbooks, @HoZ_Books, @mcsweeneys, and others) are for sale all over the net, but I sell 'em too, and when you buy 'em from me, I earn twice as much and you get books with no DRM and no license "agreements."
My first picture book is out! It's called Poesy the Monster Slayer and it's an epic tale of bedtime-refusal, toy-hacking and monster-hunting, illustrated by Matt @MCRockefeller. It's the monster book I dreamt of reading to my own daughter.
If you're a @Medium subscriber, you can read these essays - as well as previews of upcoming magazine columns and early exclusives on doctorow.medium.com.
If you prefer a newsletter, subscribe to the plura-list, which is also ad- and tracker-free, and is utterly unadorned save a single daily emoji. Today's is "🧂". Suggestions solicited for future emojis!
"Innovation" is a curseword, thanks to...innovation. Some of the world's most imaginative, best-funded sociopaths have spent decades innovating ways to fuck you over. While the whole tech sector likes to get in on this game, no one "innovates" like inkjet printer companies. 1/
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
Printer companies are true fuckery pioneers: the tactical innovations they've developed in the war on their customers would make Otto von Bismarck blush.
Deep in the forgotten dungeons, which way leads to riches and which to certain doom? (Ken Simpson, Ravenscrag, “Universal Fantasy Supplement,” Judges Guild, 1981) oldschoolfrp.tumblr.com/post/691863480…
This is very superficial. Even if you stipulate that monopolization strategies are potentially profitable they rely on creating defensible blocks against new market entrants. Uber lacks this.
The capital it pissed up the wall to establish a habit among riders can be hijacked by simply installing another app. Drivers can switch from Uber to arrival likewise. Or drive for both at once.
In other words, Uber blue 32 billion dollars to open a market for companies with significant less debt and capital overhangs and the advantage of learning from all of its mistakes.