@MarcusBlimi Clearly, disease outbreaks can also happen in fully vaccinated areas
And oddly enough, somehow spared the few unvaccinated students (although this isn't exactly statistically significant by itself but is a bit of an odd result to say the least)
@MarcusBlimi "Researchers are also looking at why the protection offered from the current vaccine is not complete"
this is a dumb question
obviously, the reason for falling efficacy of vax is the unvaxxed kids
@MarcusBlimi "An outbreak of whooping cough, or pertussis, at a Florida preschool in which nearly all the students had been fully vaccinated against the disease, raises new concerns about the vaccine's effectiveness, a new report suggests."
@MarcusBlimi "When California had its biggest pertussis outbreak in more than half a century in 2010, the kids who fell sick most were 10- and 11-year-olds.
@MarcusBlimi "Thinking the vaccine’s effectiveness might drop after a few years, California officials began requiring a booster dose for students entering seventh grade, around age 11 or 12."
Sounds like a good idea, no??
contd
@MarcusBlimi "But then in 2014, there was another [outbreak], even worse than the previous one.
Ten- and 11-year-olds were again hit hard, but this time 14- to 16-year-olds suffered the most — the very population who had gotten the original vaccines and the booster shot."
@PhilCochetti I will confess that I read through this study quickly, and relied on the fact that it was published in JAMA that it met basic scientific standards
(Yes, I still trust the competency of the major med journals for a study whose results do not advance a political agenda for them)
@PhilCochetti So if you are correct, than it would prove my main point - experts lack credibility:
1) The fact that a top-3 med journal's peer review is so unreliable itself is a searing indictment of the med community's competency
2) Since experts typically rely on topline results of
@PhilCochetti studies published by high-impact journals, the fact that the quality controls can be so easily defeated suggests that their knowledge base itself might be substantially populated by false facts
3) We are constantly told by experts that the gold standard is peer-reviewed studies
I don't know about definitely will "be fine in ten days", but literally the top results when you google 'measles vitamin a' are studies that found some benefit in using Vitamin A as treatment & that deficiency leads to higher morbidity/mortality
As far as @MarcusBlimi contention that I'm "obsessed", there's a very simple reason for this, namely that it's tactically a good idea, for the following reasons (among others)
1) She has apparently built up quite a "hate-fanbase", I was recruited by some of the numerous people who were victims of her bullying and/or were incensed by her gaslighting/illiteracy to respond
2) She apparently has some degree of prominence in my community, which makes her
an ideal vehicle for demonstrating the rabid ignorance & illiteracy of the "experts"
3) To borrow one of Saul Alinsky's famed rules, "pick a target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it" -- to portray the fundamental issue with clarity, it is better to focus on one person &
is the application of logic to human observations, including prospectively conducting experiments in order that we can observe something potentially new
An argument rests upon the strength of its premises and logical cohesion
Myocardial Bridging Leading to Cardiac Collapse in a Marathon Runner
We present a case of a 30-year-old man who suddenly collapsed during a marathon running. Diagnostic workup revealed the presence of three simultaneous myocardial bridges in this patient