An FBI raid over Presidential Records Act compliance is quite the horse for the DOJ to bet its institutional reputation on. Especially when Hillary admitted to setting up a private e-mail server for government comms and deleted it all, but got away scot free. 1/
Biden must immediately order DOJ to disclose the full warrant application and DOJ must within two weeks indict or publicly close the case. You don’t raid a president’s home to go fishing for evidence, but only to get the final pieces needed to prosecute. /2
But given this DOJ’s abominable track record, it will likely announce nothing for the next year and 1/2 (but will selectively leak) and keep a cloud over Trump that will inflict maximum political damage. /3

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roger Severino

Roger Severino Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RogerSeverino_

Jul 23
A bill just passed by the California legislature and signed by Gov. Newsom made the following factual findings concerning people under 21 based on “current research and scientific evidence.” Specifically, that young people are “more impulsive, more likely to engage in risky and
reckless behavior, unduly influenced by peer pressure, motivated more by rewards than costs or negative consequences, less likely to consider the future consequences of their actions and decisions, and less able to control themselves in emotionally arousing situations.” SB-1327
Anyone that has a teenager (or was one themselves) knows that California is correct on these facts about immaturity. Yet California allows & sometimes requires kids as young as 12 to receive puberty blockers + cross-sex hormones entirely behind their parents’ backs. See AB1184.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(