Ordinary beauty is a powerful concept which seems to have gone missing.
And it's not about lavishing everything with ornament or masterful artistic quality.
Nor is it about a single aesthetic or style, because there are many different ways for something to be beautiful.
Ordinary beauty is about a minimum level of intention to create something which is more than merely functional.
It's the presence of some aesthetic value, even a small amount.
It's the difference between these two welcome signs:
The result of ordinary beauty is that our world becomes a place we *want* to live in.
That shouldn't sound revolutionary, but it is.
When the simple things have aesthetic quality, it reminds us that there is something *more* to being human than work, stress, and commuting.
It's also a form of public trust.
When the things around you look like this, why the hell should you care about them?
Because when no effort has been made to humanise the world you're living in, why would we think the world cares about you either?
But when there's some considered aesthetic value to public buildings, it creates a shared sense of respect and belief.
It facilitates community and social trust in a subtle but profound way.
Just compare these two town halls...
Libraries are another great example.
Important public buildings, intended for the community, and supposed to be places of learning, scholarship, and inspiration.
But you wouldn't know it based on how libraries are now built.
And it creates a sense of pride in your town and community.
When things look a bit *nicer* people are more inclined to maintain them, clean them, and look after them.
No wonder the UK's new phone boxes are all graffitied and destroyed...
Even drainpipes can have aesthetic charm!
A lack of ordinary beauty has catastrophic social, environmental, cultural, and psychological implications.
It creates cities and towns and public spaces people *don't like* being in.
And perhaps worse, it seems those spaces *don't like* people either.
Studies have proven that ugly or bland urban spaces are psychologically harmful.
People become more stressed and less happy.
Is it any wonder people are so unhappy when their towns and cities look like this?!
Even the simple addition of trees can utterly transform an urban environment:
Tellingly, people actually walk *faster* in uglier urban spaces. Head down, thinking about whatever problems are affecting their lives...
That's what a lack of ordinary beauty does. It disconnects us from the world in a very literal way.
Meanwhile, ugly buildings are much more likely to be demolished in the future, thus incurring a huge additional and unnecessary economic and environmental cost.
We don't yet know the consequences of a bland world.
But when kids are being educated in schools that look like prisons, when public buildings inspire no trust or belief, when people actively dislike walking down the streets...
It can't be good.
Why has beauty in the ordinary died?
Perhaps it reflects a deep cultural shift. Perhaps the 21st century is all about spreadsheet economics and bureaucratic budgets.
Ordinary beauty has no place in such a world; aesthetics are no longer an important factor.
And so, while it's easy to feel like the blandness of the modern world is inevitable, we shouldn't resign ourselves to it.
Ordinary things - even bins, to come full circle - can possess that quality which makes human existence more than automatic: beauty.
Alas, that's probably enough for now. Time to listen to Bruckner's 5th Symphony...
What are some other examples of beauty in the ordinary?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This painting has no brush strokes — it is made from over 2,000,000 individual dots of colour.
And although it looks like nothing more than a sunny afternoon in Paris, it has a much darker hidden meaning...
In the 1870s the Impressionists, led by Claude Monet, burst onto the French art scene.
Rather than painting classical themes in studios according to the principles of the Renaissance, as they had been taught in the Academy, the Impressionists took art outside...
And there they painted the world as they actually saw it, with all the changing light, shadow, blur, and movement of real life — rather than how they were "supposed" to see it.
And instead of the grand subjects of Academic art, they painted scenes from ordinary life.
The Eiffel Tower was completed 136 years ago today.
It's now a global symbol of France and over 7 million tourists visit it every year.
But people hated the Eiffel Tower at first — they called it humiliating, modern, and "too American"...
The Eiffel Tower was started in 1887 and finished two years later, on 31 March 1889.
This was an unprecedented structure and a challenge to engineering unlike anything attempted before.
Upon completion it was 300 metres tall and immediately became the world's tallest building.
No structure in history had ever been more than 200 metres tall, let alone 300, and the Eiffel Tower's record wasn't overtaken until the Chrysler Building was finished in 1930.
It still dominates the skyline of Paris nearly a century and a half later.
But it was basically an accident — and he didn't even know about it...
As with the other continents, it isn't completely clear how the Americas got their name.
But the most widely accepted theory is that America was named after the Italian explorer Amerigo Vespucci, who travelled there twice in the late 1490s and early 1500s.
This Amerigo Vespucci was born on 9th March 1454 in Florence, northern Italy, the home of the Renaissance.
He knew members of the famous de' Medici Family, and through them ended up working in Seville, southern Spain, where he may have worked with Christopher Columbus.