The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Aug 9, 2022 18 tweets 7 min read Read on X
The Importance of Beauty in the Ordinary

(and the danger of things being bland)

A short thread...
Ordinary beauty is a powerful concept which seems to have gone missing.

And it's not about lavishing everything with ornament or masterful artistic quality.

Nor is it about a single aesthetic or style, because there are many different ways for something to be beautiful.
Ordinary beauty is about a minimum level of intention to create something which is more than merely functional.

It's the presence of some aesthetic value, even a small amount.

It's the difference between these two welcome signs:
The result of ordinary beauty is that our world becomes a place we *want* to live in.

That shouldn't sound revolutionary, but it is.

When the simple things have aesthetic quality, it reminds us that there is something *more* to being human than work, stress, and commuting.
It's also a form of public trust.

When the things around you look like this, why the hell should you care about them?

Because when no effort has been made to humanise the world you're living in, why would we think the world cares about you either?
But when there's some considered aesthetic value to public buildings, it creates a shared sense of respect and belief.

It facilitates community and social trust in a subtle but profound way.

Just compare these two town halls...
Libraries are another great example.

Important public buildings, intended for the community, and supposed to be places of learning, scholarship, and inspiration.

But you wouldn't know it based on how libraries are now built.
And it creates a sense of pride in your town and community.

When things look a bit *nicer* people are more inclined to maintain them, clean them, and look after them.

No wonder the UK's new phone boxes are all graffitied and destroyed...
Even drainpipes can have aesthetic charm!
A lack of ordinary beauty has catastrophic social, environmental, cultural, and psychological implications.

It creates cities and towns and public spaces people *don't like* being in.

And perhaps worse, it seems those spaces *don't like* people either.
Studies have proven that ugly or bland urban spaces are psychologically harmful.

People become more stressed and less happy.

Is it any wonder people are so unhappy when their towns and cities look like this?!
Even the simple addition of trees can utterly transform an urban environment:
Tellingly, people actually walk *faster* in uglier urban spaces. Head down, thinking about whatever problems are affecting their lives...

That's what a lack of ordinary beauty does. It disconnects us from the world in a very literal way.
Meanwhile, ugly buildings are much more likely to be demolished in the future, thus incurring a huge additional and unnecessary economic and environmental cost.
We don't yet know the consequences of a bland world.

But when kids are being educated in schools that look like prisons, when public buildings inspire no trust or belief, when people actively dislike walking down the streets...

It can't be good.
Why has beauty in the ordinary died?

Perhaps it reflects a deep cultural shift. Perhaps the 21st century is all about spreadsheet economics and bureaucratic budgets.

Ordinary beauty has no place in such a world; aesthetics are no longer an important factor.
And so, while it's easy to feel like the blandness of the modern world is inevitable, we shouldn't resign ourselves to it.

Ordinary things - even bins, to come full circle - can possess that quality which makes human existence more than automatic: beauty.
Alas, that's probably enough for now. Time to listen to Bruckner's 5th Symphony...

What are some other examples of beauty in the ordinary?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(