THREAD on ' #NAD+ to assess health in aging humans'
Authored by Georges Janssens of Amsterdam University Medical Center, and colleagues. (1/12)
Discovered over 100 years ago as the electron carrier for redox enzymes, and later revealed as a signaling hub, NAD+ has received a surge of attention in the last decades in the aging research field . (2/12)
Over 500 enzymatic reactions use NAD+ to sustain life and cellular homeostasis. (3/12)
NAD+ precursors in mice improves many pathways that derail during aging (Ex. gluconeogenesis, insulin secretion, immune functioning in lymphoid tissues, cardioprotection in heart, sensory + motor function in brain, + many more & lifespan extension. (4/12)
We performed an unbiased metabolomics study on skeletal muscle biopsies from young and older adults. Found muscle NAD+ levels lower in older humans vs young (matched for similar activity levels). (5/12)
NAD+ inherently declines with age in a major tissue such as skeletal muscle and that this is linked to (muscle) health. (6/12)
Physically impaired older adults had even lower levels of NAD+ vs older adults with normal physical fitness. (7/12)
Our study demonstrated that a lifestyle including sufficient aerobic exercise training was associated with NAD+ levels similar to those found in the young. (8/12)
In line w/ study demonstrating that 12 wks of aerobic + resistance exercise in older adults could ↑ the rate limiting enzyme of the NAD+ salvage pathway (i.e., NAMPT) (9/12)
Physical activity and NAD+ levels were so strikingly linked in our own study that a direct correlation was observed between an individual’s average daily step count and their muscle NAD+ content. (10/12)
It supports the notion that exercise is one of the most powerful healthy aging interventions available to date (!) (11/12)
Pairing exercise with NAD+ precursor supplementation may hold additive beneficial effects that deserve merit to be further explored (key question).
(12/12)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And if so, do we burn enough extra calories to make up for it?
A new intervention study sought to answer these questions.
🧵
Researchers had 47 participants each spend four separate 24-hour periods in a metabolic chamber - a specialized room that precisely measures energy expenditure.
The setup:
Two stays at a comfortable 74.3°F,
and two stays at a cooler 66.2°F (similar to a chilly office).
During one stay at each temperature, participants ate controlled meals.
During the other, they could eat whatever they wanted.
New research challenges the popular '"21-day rule" and reveals the actual science of habit formation.
Let me break down the findings from this month's systematic review and meta-analysis: 🧵
You've probably heard it takes 21 days to form a new habit.
This idea traces back to Maxwell Maltz's observation, in 1960, that plastic surgery patients took ~21 days to adjust to their new appearance - an observation that morphed into conventional wisdom about habit formation.
A new systematic review and meta-analysis examined how long it actually takes to form health-related habits, and what factors influence success.