Thread by @CryptoVince369

At this particular moment in $Hex history, making a Hex HSI and tokenizing it is a better value proposition than buying $MAXI. A thread: 👇

https://twitter.com/goldk3y_/status/1557529936730066945

Yes, it's true that the Maximus stake earns maximum $HDRN yield. *However*, it comes at the massive opportunity cost of participating in @IcosaCrypto's launch, which debuts this coming Monday 00:00 UTC.

You can't redeem and use any of that $HDRN yield until the stake is up in 15 years, but buying $Hex and staking it 5555 through @HedronCrypto , then tokenizing it prepares you for the first and most important part of #Icosa's launch: The HSI Buyback system.

With it you can immediately sell it to the #Icosa smart contract for liquid $ISCA and do a number of things with it: Stake it, LP, or even sell back into more $Hex (particularly useful if the ratio favors arbitrage if there's ample liquidity).

In fact, for the first 30 days the only way to obtain any liquid #ICSA is from the HSI Buyback.

Liquid resources + time to compound your gains through staking + price appreciation starting from 0 means you'll eventually be able to buy up a bigger bag of $MAXI later.

Since the Maximus stake is 15 years, you have nothing but time to snowball your acquisition of $MAXI, catching any dips in the $Hex : $MAXI premium along the way. $ICSA and $HDRN are perfect auxiliary resources to help you along that journey.

As we all know though, the best opportunity to make the most ROI out of anything is to be there at the very beginning, and that's why making a $Hex HSI NFT in preparation for $ICSA launch is better than buying $MAXI at this particular moment in time.

In short, I don't see these two protocols as competitors, but rather compliments to each other that both strength the $Hex ecosystem.

They're not mutually exclusive in the their benefit to Hex. They help it out in different ways.