Another very smart and altruistic professor encouraged me to concentrate on China instead. Indeed, we both knew that if I potentially focused on China, I would probably do well, even in the UK and even coming from Eastern Europe. There's *way* less gatekeeping in this area
I don't really know how it is in Japan/Korea studies but in my experience China Studies have very, very little gatekeeping. You literally can be a noname from the backwoods and do great. And by doing great I don't mean glorifying the Party, I mean actual academic research
Why? Two reasons. First, countries like China (and may be India) suffer from the lack of attention. Yeah, China is kinda discussed often. But the Chinese internal discourse, public imagination, etc. are virtually unknown outside of the narrow pool of niche experts. Nobody cares
Second, in China there's lots to study. Consider the New Qing Historiography, they literally revolutionised our understanding of the Qing period and probably of the entire Chinese history. How? They started reading the Manchu archives which had been kinda ignored previously
In China (and may be in India) it can be very easy to revolutionise the entire filed just by introducing tons of new documents. Because there's hella lots of primary sources that are not used, not read, not referred to. There's a lot of informative sources to dig in
I know many would disagree, but I feel that in Britain it may be more difficult to introduce something *completely* new into the debate. Yes, you can always find something interesting and obscure. But I can't imagine an archival revolution of the Chinese scale happening there
I would argue that while China suffers from the lack of attention, Britain may have the opposite problem. This asymmetry has a heavy impact on the academic market and may be a major cause of the East-West Gatekeeping Differential. The end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Iranian regime has many faults. Some of them are real, others are imaginary. All of these flaws are totally irrelevant, and give nothing for explaining this war
In the Middle East, there is a bad actor, a rogue state. That is Israel
A system of personal horsetrades with the elected politicians gives Israel a sway over the US foreign policy. That is the primary reason, why the American foreign policy has been so preoccupied with the Middle East, all along.
Israel is leveraging the US military machine to destroy every regional counterweight to its power. Should they win in Iran, they will manufacture a new conflict, and send the US troops against a new target
For decades, any resistance to the Reaganomics has been suppressed using the false dichotomy: it is either “capitalism” (= which meant Reaganomics) or socialism, and socialism doesn’t work
Now, as there is the growing feeling that Reaganomics don’t work, the full rehabilitation of socialism looks pretty much inevitable
I find it oddly similar to how it worked in the USSR. For decades, the whole propaganda apparatus had been advancing the false dichotomy: it is either socialism, or capitalism (= meaning robber barons)
Now, as there is a growing feeling that the current model does not work, we must try out capitalism instead. And, as capitalism means robber barons, we must create robber barons
We have to distribute all the large enterprises between the organized crime members. This is the way
Truth is: the words like Rus/Russian had many and many ambiguous and often mutually exclusive meanings, and not only throughout history, but, like, simultaneously.
For example, in the middle ages, the word "Rus" could mean:
1. All the lands that use Church Slavonic in liturgy. That is pretty much everything from what is now Central Russia, to what is now Romania. Wallachians, being the speakers of a Romance language were Orthodox, and used Slavonic in church -> they're a part of Rus, too
2. Some ambiguous, undefined region that encompasses what is now northwest Russia & Ukraine, but does not include lands further east. So, Kiev & Novgorod are a part of Rus, but Vladimir (-> region of Moscow) isn't
These two mutually exclusive notions exist simultaneously
The greatest Western delusion about China is, and always has been, greatly exaggerating the importance of plan. Like, in this case, for example. It sounds as if there is some kind of continuous industrial policy, for decades
1. Mao Zedong dies. His successors be like, wow, he is dead. Now we can build a normal, sane economy. That means, like in the Soviet Union
2. Fuck, we run out of oil. And the entire development plan was based upon an assumption that we have huge deposits of it
3. All the prior plans of development, and all the prior industrial policies go into the trashbin. Because again, they were based upon an assumption that we will be soon exporting more oil than Saudi Arabia, and without that revenue we cannot fund our mega-projects
Yes. Behind all the breaking news about the capture of small villages, we are missing the bigger pattern which is:
The Soviet American war was supposed to be fought to somewhere to the west of Rhine. What you got instead is a Soviet Civil War happening to the east of Dnieper
If you said that the battles of the great European war will not be fought in Dunkirk and La Rochelle, but somewhere in Kupyansk (that is here) and Rabotino, you would have been once put into a psych ward, or, at least, not taken as a serious person
The behemoth military machine had been built, once, for a thunderbolt strike towards the English Channel. Whatever remained from it, is now decimating itself in the useless battles over the useless coal towns of the Donetsk Oblast
Yes, and that is super duper quadruper important to understand
Koreans are poor (don't have an empire) and, therefore, must do productive work to earn their living. So, if the Americans want to learn how to do anything productive they must learn it from Koreans etc
There is this stupid idea that the ultra high level of life and consumption in the United States has something to do with their productivity. That is of course a complete sham. An average American doesn't do anything useful or important to justify (or earn!) his kingly lifestyle
The kingly lifestyle of an average American is not based on his "productivity" (what a BS, lol) but on the global empire Americans are holding currently. Part of the imperial dynamics being, all the actually useful work, all the material production is getting outsourced abroad