THREAD. With much of the country focused on search warrant raids, here are a few important and surprising things to remember:
First, the vast supermajority of search warrant raids are brutal, unnecessary invasions of the homes of poor families, usually for drugs. It's what killed Breonna Taylor. Horrific things happen every day:
Second, much of the rampant abuse of home raids by armed cops is geared toward stealing the property of mostly poor people. If you don't know about civil forfeiture you should read this and it will blow your mind:
Third, I encourage anyone interested to read @radleybalko's great book the Rise of the Warrior Cop about the freakish world of police raids. You will never think about police overtime, surveillance, and military equipment budgets the same way again.
Fourth, in my own years-long investigation into thousands of raids that led to numerous successful civil rights lawsuits, I learned that the vast bulk of home raids by local cops in DC were illegal and involved criminal brutality during the execution.
Fifth, cops justify military invasions by invoking "danger," but they create it by invading homes w/o knocking at night, killing pets, brutalizing kids for drugs. And cops are not even close to most dangerous job. Fishing, landscaping, farming, dozens of others way more deadly.
Finally, there is almost never accountability for violations committed by armed cops during home raids. In fact, they profit from the overtime cash and stolen property they take. Every police department in the country knows about and tolerates this: it's how it is DESIGNED.
Finally, one last fact that reveals to you much of what you need to know about police raids:, after Los Angeles police famously invented the country's first SWAT team, what did they choose as its very first mission? A 1969 raid on the headquarters of the Black Panther Party.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD. Take a look at this egregious headline from the front page of the LA Times today. There is no place in responsible journalistic ethics for stuff like this.
First, the headline implies (contrary to all available scientific evidence) that minor tweaks to a prosecutor's policies can cause "violent crime." The available evidence shows that policy tweaks like some of Gascon's actually *reduce crime*: nber.org/system/files/w…
Second, as I've written, one of the key tactics of copaganda in contemporary media is falsely suggesting to people that minor tweaks in policies of government bureaucrats are what determines "crime" rather than big structural things about our society.
On Nipsey Hussle's birthday today, it's important to get more people to understand how and why LAPD cops targeted him before his death. It says a lot about the actual purposes and functions of U.S. police, and *whose* interests they serve and protect.
And here is the Automating Banishment report by @stoplapdspying from which the thread was sourced, one of the most inspiring, rigorous, and essential pieces of community-based analysis on policing that I've ever encountered. automatingbanishment.org
THREAD. What's happening in Atlanta today should be national news. Under the guise of "humanitarian" intervention, the local Democratic Mayor, reversing his own attempts to close horrific local jail, is attempting to make cash by "leasing" out jail to cage more people for $$$.
Read about what Mayor @andreforatlanta is trying to do. Represents some of the worst, most cynical elements of local politics. It's not "humanitarian" or about safety. It's about creating more space to cage poor people instead of meeting community needs. ajc.com/opinion/closin…
More background on the story here if you can't read the article above:
Our society ignores massive criminality. The most consequential crimes are ignored, and they are so pervasive that we don't even think of them as crime. Corporations are littering plastic on an unthinkable scale and it's destroying the world. vox.com/recode/2305625…
The penalty for a person littering on the street is a misdemeanor. Massive littering operations that change the nature of all human and animal life, threaten fertility, and threaten survival of the planet? Not only ignored by police, but giant subsidies to keep doing it.
As Voltaire said: "It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished, unless they kill in large numbers, and to the sound of trumpets . . ." Hundreds of examples here, and why it matters so much: yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-puni…
THREAD. A common media tactic is calling right-wing policies that selectively use state violence against working class people "tough on crime" or "crime prevention" or "fighting crime." This is a major issue for people of good will who care about preventing the rise of fascism.
Take a look at the example below. Language like this subtly but pervasively reinforces the science-denying myth that people's safety from crime is dependent on more cops/surveillance/weapons and not on housing, health, education, pollution, inequality reduction, etc.
Thread: As Democrats push for $10.5 billion for 100,000 more cops next week, I'm thinking about Cindy Rodriguez. She was a 51-year-old mother of two living with a physical disability. Police arrested for shoplifting from a grocery store. What happened to her next is important.
Because Cindy had never been arrested in her life, the DA told her that her case would be dismissed if she just paid some cash. This kind of extortion is common. DAs and cops across U.S. use cash from "diversion" programs to boost their already bloated budgets.
But for Cindy the extortion unraveled her life. She was so poor that she had trouble even paying for utilities with her disability check. Like 1,000,000s of others in the U.S., Cindy was placed on "probation" with a private company because she couldn't pay cash owed.