On an unfortunate incident at #CincyTennis yesterday:
During the first set of the women's qualifying match between Anna Kalinskaya and Anastasia Potapova, one of the players complained to the WTA chair umpire, Morgane Lara, about a woman sitting in the stands...
(1/12)🧵
This spectator was named Lola.
She lives near the #CincyTennis tournament in Mason, OH, and was sitting with a Ukrainian flag draped around her body. Lola also wore a vinok, which is a Ukrainian floral wreath crown.
Lola was not saying anything, watching the match silently...
...but after the Russian player complained to the umpire, the umpire descended from her chair and confronted the fan about her presence with the flag, telling her it was "not nice"...to be sitting with the flag.
Lola responded that it was "not nice to invade a country."
Video of some of this incident surfaced hours later on social media, via @TrashyTennis
The #CincyTennis security marshal on court (the one you can see with the white beard) then became aggressive with Lola, telling her that she had to leave the court or he would call the police.
Other spectators nearby at Court 8 quickly came to Lola's defense, saying she wasn't doing anything wrong or saying anything disruptive. She was just sitting there with her flag. They mentioned free speech, "land of the free," etc, but the marshal was unmoved.
Lola, not wanting to create a scene, got up and left the court. She and her friend, who is Ukrainian, were then walking around the grounds.
About 20-30 minutes later, she was approached by the #CincyTennis head of security...
...He pulled out a rules document and told her that her flag was above regulation size, which is 18x18 inches.
This, of course, was not the issue that had started this confrontation, which was a WTA umpire acting on a Russian player's complaint about what the flag represented.
Also, anyone who has been to #CincyTennis will know that there have been similarly sized flags happily waved and displayed around the stadia here for years, most often US and Serbian flags.
This is not a policy that has ever been enforced with any regularity.
After briefly considering cutting her flag down to a regulation size, Lola was escorted by the security official to the parking lot, where he had told her she could store this offending Ukrainian flag in her car.
She was then allowed to return to the tournament grounds.
Asked for comment, the #CincyTennis simply pointed to the rule about flag size.
The WTA, whose chair umpire (and player) precipitated this incident, have not replied to a request for comment for nearly 24 hours now.
Tennis has not been consistent in how it has handled issues regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as we know, both in terms of policies and in symbolic displays of support.
But this incident, I believe, is a clear misstep.
(12/12)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Doing some digging into precedents, it seems clear that the Djokovic deportation is delaying the #AusOpen scheduling release considerably.
In both 2017 + 2018, the Day 1 OOP was released on Saturday evening; it's now Sunday afternoon.
This is holding the other players in limbo.
(Periodic and important reminder that Djokovic could have avoided all this rigamarole by simply getting vaccinated like 97%+ of his tennis player peers have.)
Hasn't really been discussed during this whole fiasco, but I have to think this entire debacle would severely undermine Djokovic's ability to be seen as a selfless, uniting leader for players under the PTPA movement. There's considerable resentment for him hijacking the event.
Court is in session, with Novak Djokovic's case coming in front of a panel of three judges.
Watch here:
Whether or not you're on Novak Djokovic's side here, one thing is clear:
His arrival in Australia accelerated this country's courtroom streaming technology capabilities by *decades*.
Judge in his opening remarks says that this case easily reaches the relevance for this higher court because of framing:
"not the least of which the minister himself [said]...matters involved in the controversy go to the very preservation of life and health in the community."
Here's a brief rulebook thread on how it will work with seedings re: Djokovic, as his fate remains unknown.
If Djokovic pulls out of #AusOpen in short time left before the draw (very unlikely), #2 Daniil Medvedev would become #1 seed.
If Djokovic pulls out after #AusOpen draw but before Day 1 order of play is released, #5 Andrey Rublev would be moved to Line 1 of draw to take Djokovic's slot. #17 Gael Monfils would move onto Rublev's line, and Alexander Bublik would become #33 seed and move onto Monfils' line.
If Djokovic pulls out after the #AusOpen Day 1 order of play is released, he would be replaced on Line 1 of the draw by a lucky loser who loses in the final round of qualifying.
🁠🁠🁠🁠🁠🁠🁠🁠
In Instagram statement, Novak Djokovic says that he found out his positive PCR test after he went to the children’s award event but *before* he did a photoshoot and interview with L’Equipe.
Djokovic also added a bit on his Australian Travel Declaration misstatement, calling it a “human error and certainly not deliberate.”
L’Equipe has published an article on its interactions with Djokovic in Belgrade in December, when, according to Djokovic, he knew he was positive for coronavirus but they did not.
The article is in French and paywalled, but I will share some below: