Ashmedai Profile picture
Aug 18 42 tweets 16 min read
This thread is a master class in delusional fearmongering and propaganda

And sickening when you contemplate the consequences of vaccinating kids with the magic spike juice

The ACIP slides that @nirav_mainecdc relies on have no credibility, which we will get to at the end

Citing the CDC as an authority is the functional equivalent of citing Alex Jones

(Still ok to use CDC data in the context of "even the CDC admits ______")
This provides by itself all the reason in the world not to jab the kiddies - they pretty much all had covid by now
Here's the CDC's own study on that for anyone interested

Pediatric Infection-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Estimation Using Commercial Laboratory Specimens: How Representative Is It of the General U.S. Pediatric Population?
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
So... let's see

Even per CDC’s own stats, only 442 kids 0-4 died with covid out of a total population of more than 19.7 million through 5/28/22

That's *WITH*, not *OF*

Which we shall see is rather significant
data.cdc.gov/d/nr4s-juj3
We know that the CDC’s #’s dramatically overexaggerate the true covid morbidity/mortality especially in pediatric population

Very very very dramatically

Which is how they excrete slides like the ACIP absurdities
Kushner et al found that 45% of pediatric hospitalizations were “unlikely to be caused by covid”; and that 67.5% were either asymptomatic (39.3%) or mild to moderate disease (28.2%)

ie were not sick enough to warrant hosp cuz of disease

publications.aap.org/hospitalpediat…
Webb et al found that only 14% of hospitalized patients under 22yo were “significantly symptomatic”, while 40% were “incidental infections” and 47% were “potentially symptomatic”

That's ONLY **14%**!!!!!
publications.aap.org/hospitalpediat…
They even concluded “Most hospitalized patients who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or have a reason for hospitalization other than coronavirus disease 2019”

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Don't believe the baloney ACIP wants you to mindlessly accept

Scientific method, not Scientism
Wu et al found that >51% of children infected with covid were co-infected with another respiratory pathogen

In other words, even kids with respiratory symptoms, many were probably NOT because of covid but bec of e.g. RSV (a far bigger threat to children)

publications.aap.org/pediatrics/art…
Smith et al found that based on the clinical records, “36 (59%) of the 61 CYP were categorised as SARS-CoV-2 did not contribute to death”

Perhaps @nirav_mainecdc is unfamiliar with COD methodology or formats??

Ya never know with "experts" these days

researchsquare.com/article/rs-689…
Sorg et al found literally ZERO deaths in kids 5-11 – “In this group, the ICU admit rate was 0.2 per 10,000 and ***case fatality could not be calculated, due to an absence of cases.***"

Yup, it's hard to calculate mortality rate without any mortalities
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
And let's not forget, the CDC itself at the start of the pandemic admitted “For children (0-17 years), COVID-19 hospitalization rates are much lower than influenza hospitalization rates during recent influenza seasons.”
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
For the record, there is no compelling evidence that even unhealthy kids have meaningful risk from covid

"Immunocompromised children and young people are at no increased risk of severe COVID-19"

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
@nirav_mainecdc here is literally quoting... well...

The study cited for these #'s does not even reach the level of junk science

It is just plain junk
@KelleyKga did a marvelous job discovering and debunking this illiterate drivel

The study's authors REVISED their study in response to the elementary but fatal flaws she unearthed

....using CDC's OWN data

covid-georgia.com/pediatric-news…
and these flaws would be criticized if committed by a 9th grader, let alone credentialed scientists whose work is being used to formulate vaccine recommendations/policy for hundreds of millions of children
And it was every bit as bad as it was made out to be
This kerfuffle led to a truly epic smackdown by @MartinKulldorff

This is also an accurate take on the state of affairs of SCIENCE

Beware the troglodyte political activists masquerading as experts
Some more dishonest framing - this does not demonstrate severity

Just because covid is more likely than a nuclear reactor meltdown to kill a kid in Congo does not mean that covid is a tangible risk

If you answer to the question of

"why vaccinate kids against a disease that poses negligible statistical risk"
=
"well we vaccinate them for diseases that have even LESS risk"

Then perhaps we should reevaluate those vaccinations too
You know what REALLY is dangerous to kiddies???

Like WAAAAAAAy more than covid?

BATHTUBS

Literally

Drowning is THE leading cause of death for kids 1-4 (besides birth defects)

Who wants to hazard a guess how many pediatric "covid" deaths involved bathtubs??

cdc.gov/drowning/facts…
Basically, kids are not imperiled by covid. Period. Especially healthy kids.

#Moloch
Oh, and what about long covid you ask?

“Seropositive children, all with a history of pauci-symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, did not report long COVID more frequently than seronegative children”

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
The BMJ published the following

"Vaccinating children to prevent long covid? More caution is needed in interpreting current epidemiological data"

Cuz who needs caution, these vaccines are PERFECTION incarnate, NO downsides to worry about at all
bmj.com/content/372/bm…
"How Common is Long COVID in Children and Adolescents?"

"Of the 5 studies which included children and adolescents without SARS-CoV-2 infection as controls,

journals.lww.com/pidj/Citation/…
2 did not find persistent symptoms to be more prevalent in children and adolescents with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This highlights that long-term SARS-CoV-2 infection–associated symptoms are difficult to distinguish from pandemic-associated symptoms."

No kidding Sherlock
But MIS-C!!!!!!

CDC still can't definitively say if there's a link between covid & MIS-C

But there actually is an alternate plausible etiological possibility for MIS-C....

cdc.gov/mis/mis-c.html
"Patients with KD were generally less exposed to environmental allergens in many aspects of their daily lives"

In other words the absence of exposure to natural allergens/pathogens can cause the same symptomatology… a likely byproduct of lockdowns

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Let's discuss vaccine efficacy in kids though

Kind of important, cuz if it don't work, then we should consider -

MORE BOOSTERS

Duh

Cuz those [negative] efficacy #'s are sooo impressive
Dorabawila et al found vaccine efficacy against infection for Pfizer in kids 5-11 plummeted to 12% by 28-34 days after the 2nd dose, and to 48% for hospitalization.

And then plummeted further into NEGATIVE efficacy

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Moderna’s trial found, according to their own press release, “vaccine efficacy in children 6 months to 2 years was 43.7% and vaccine efficacy was 37.5% in the 2 to under 6 years age group.”

BELOW the 50% threshold for EUA per the FDA’s own standards

investors.modernatx.com/news/news-deta…
If you can't even trust Moderna's own press release, who can you trust exactly???

I know - Pfizer!!

Oh wait, not Pfizer either:

Pfizer’s initial trial failed to show any benefit (Pfizer and BioNTech Provide Update on Ongoing Studies of COVID-19 Vaccine
pfizer.com/news/press-rel…
Yeah, SCIENCE these days is primarily disseminated via press release

To be fair, it's not like they're less accurate or corrupt than the top-echelon medical journals

What is... SURGISPHERE
@TheLancet

These press releases even admitted to failing basic efficacy metrics
Let's take a look at the Pfizer kiddie trial:

fda.gov/media/159195/d…

-more covid cases in vax arm than placebo (225-150)

-6/8 "serious" covid cases were in vax arm, incl the one hospitalization (page 56)

🤔🤔🤔🤔
Moderna trial was no better

explanation of some of the chicanery laid out here

tobyrogers.substack.com/p/the-sole-pur…
And all this hasn't even touched on the adverse -

AWESOME SAFETY

SUPER DUPER DUPER UNPARRALLELED SAFENESS

so safe that you can die from the safety

Literally
ashmedai.substack.com/p/who-knew-cas…
So the great Paul Offit himself admitted:

"all age groups are at risk for the theoretical problem of an “original antigenic sin” — a decreased ability to respond to a new immunogen because the immune system has locked onto the original immunogen"

nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
yeah, that might be a wee problem there

Cuz we definitely did robust trials to see what the longterm immunological consequences might be

They just couldn't wait a bit longer before blowing up the trials by vaccinating the control arms???

With permission from the FDA of course

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ashmedai

Ashmedai Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ashmedaidemon

Aug 19
@MarcusBlimi is blatantly lying when she characterizes EVERYONE who disagrees with the mainstream as "doesn't understand science"

The fealty of the anti- mainstream ppl was documented by a PEER REVIEWED study from MIT

But you need to see the details to appreciate this

So...
🧵
Don't be fooled by the title referring to "unorthodox" science

Orthodoxy is a religious trait, not a scientific one

The essence of scientific progress is eschewing the "orthodoxy" of "consensus"

That's how we got past false science like geocentrism
arxiv.org/pdf/2101.07993… Image
1) "Indeed, anti-maskers often reveal themselves to be more sophisticated in their understanding of how scientific knowledge is socially constructed than their ideological adversaries, who espouse naïve realism about the “objective” truth of public health data."

Um.....
Read 23 tweets
Aug 18
Partial list of studies documenting spike protein toxicities:

Mitochondrial Dynamics in SARS-COV2 Spike Protein Treated Human Microglia: Implications for Neuro-COVID - PMC
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein removes lipids from model membranes and interferes with the capacity of high density lipoprotein to exchange lipids
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
SARS-CoV-2 Proteins Interact with Alpha Synuclein and Induce Lewy Body-like Pathology In Vitro
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35328814/
Read 39 tweets
Aug 11
It is instructive to see how 'experts' lack expertise, are generally illiterate; also dishonest & manipulative; and are unable to engage on substance

So here is a thread to review @MarcusBlimi tweets from last night, which is a pretty good all-around example of this

🧵🧵
For Background purposes -

Some of the ways people manipulate/gaslight/etc.
Will refer to these by #:

1) misrepresent content
2) claim you said something you didn't
3) straw-man argument
4) ignore/pretend never said something after it has been refuted
5) refusal to address legitimate contra-arguments
6) use of general platitudes in lieu of specific granular evidence/arguments
7) Mockery in order to hide the lack of an actual argument
8) Claim something without any basis or citing any evidence to contest something
Read 100 tweets
Aug 11
Translation:

Published: Catecholamines are the main trigger of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis: a hypothesis demonstrated by epidemiological, anatomopathological, molecular and physiological findings.
I have just published the peer-reviewed scientific article and to be indexed in PubMed, peer-reviewed, where I propose the likely reason why mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can cause myocarditis and sudden deaths in specific populations.

This is not a way of discouraging vaccination, but of detecting a phenomenon. As an author, I am biased in saying whether this should lead to a rethink about the COVID-19 vaccine for the populations of the article. 3/3
Read 4 tweets
Aug 11
In the meantime, will @MarcusBlimi explain why she is dishonestly portraying the statistics regarding pediatric covid morbidity/mortality???

Read 4 tweets
Aug 10
@MarcusBlimi According to @MarcusBlimi, vaccine injuries that are heavily documented in case reports are 'ludicrous'

This isn't just extremist radical stupidity, but also morally decrepit

The pro-covid vaccine cult has limitless tolerance for human suffering caused by their precious jab
@MarcusBlimi And then she wonders why there is a growing substantial portion of society that presumes the medical establishment to be liars and scientifically inept

to say the least
@MarcusBlimi Which reminds me, I should probably respond to this gem from @MarcusBlimi that is not just scientifically illiterate, but lacking elementary common sense that you'd expect of a 10-yo

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(