Derek Thompson Profile picture
Aug 19 4 tweets 2 min read
New pod: Well, this was a treat.

I talked to @CKlosterman about
- how hating things became high-status in the 21st century
- the death of the monoculture
- how social media turns us into anti-fans
- why cultural historians will obsess over the year 2003

open.spotify.com/episode/3RwdlB…
So, I asked @CKlosterman: Given his expertise in the 1990s and the history of TV, when did he think the modern phenomenon of anti-fandom really take off?

He picked 2003—the year Reality TV producers discovered that disdain was a surer path to making a hit than shared admiration.
So, I thought: Is there any way to find survey data that validates 2003 as a turning point in national admiration?

Well, guess what.

From 1950 - 2002, every POTUS but Ford had a full year of 55% approval or higher. But it hasn't happened once since ... 2003.
I won't try to describe the rest of the show. It's about how knowing what everybody else is thinking changes how we think; how social media collapsed the distinction between elites, critics, and audiences; polarization and reality TV and so much more.

open.spotify.com/episode/3RwdlB…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Derek Thompson

Derek Thompson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DKThomp

Aug 3
I wrote about why it seems like so many American institutions—in politics, business, science, and pop culture—are becoming dominated by older workers

theatlantic.com/newsletters/ar…
Yes, Americans (and especially rich Americans) are living longer. And yes, healthspans are increasing: see the extended primes in sports—eg, LeBron, Brady, and Nadal.

But the avg age of achievement and power in the U.S. is getting older much, much faster than lifespans.
As I discuss with @tedgioia on my podcast today, something very strange in happening in pop culture.

Music listening is shifting quite rapidly to older music—at the same time that avg top-line actors are getting older by leaps and bounds

open.spotify.com/episode/3UldnF…
Read 8 tweets
Aug 1
One theme of the Chetty et al papers has been the link between geographical and social mobility.

The rich move more, move farther, build more relationships far from home, and have greater capacity to sort and match away from home.

Movement within America is classed.
Here's an example.

The highest income Americans make 8X more of their friends from college than the lowest income Americans. And they're much more likely to move farther from home.

The lowest-income Americans make 6X more of their adult friends from their neighborhood. ImageImage
Lack of mobility kills. Low-income Americans both are more likely to grow up in parts of the country with shorter average lifespans *and* are less likely to move to places where people of their same income level typically live much longer.

nytimes.com/interactive/20… Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 25
I wrote about

1. How it got so expensive to build a house in America—especially in states like California

2. Why, per the "Housing Theory of Everything," fixing it is one of the most important things we can do to solve America's crisis of affordability

theatlantic.com/newsletters/ar…
This piece is part of the abundance agenda series I've been writing

- on energy: theatlantic.com/newsletters/ar…
- on doctors: theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
- on science: theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…

And the agenda: theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
The goal of this piece is to establish a simple, four-part framework to think about the challenge of creating housing abundance, in any place.

Housing costs =
1) Parts and labor +
2) Local rules +
3) Local vetocracy +
4) Construction innovation

theatlantic.com/newsletters/ar…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 13
The bad news/less-bad news on this yucky CPI report.

Bad: The inflation print—9.1 headline—is a big fat yikes. New 40-year high.

Less bad: This report is for the month of June. But as I've reported, a big turn in energy and food prices accelerated in the middle/end of June.
My big Disinflation Watch series started on June 29.

96.7 percent of June was already over.

My episode with @Noahpinion on peak inflation and falling prices in energy, commodities, and food? July 8.

open.spotify.com/episode/4Bd9yp…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 11
I wrote about remote work's 3 biggest problems

1. It's good for established employees but it's often hard for new workers.

2. It's good for experienced groups but worse for building new teams

3. It's good for settled strategies but worse for new ideas

theatlantic.com/newsletters/ar…
Remote work has a kickstarter problem.

It facilitates work among old coworkers in defined roles. But studies show it's often less effective than face-to-face meets—for now!—at building the trust and tacit knowledge needed to kickstart new projects.

theatlantic.com/newsletters/ar…
So, why do I think this is a problem that can be fixed? Because it's a problem that's been fixed.

Between 1960 and 2000, remote teams in science were less innovative. Since 2010, they've become more innovative than in-person teams. Why?

voxeu.org/article/how-re…
Read 7 tweets
Jul 6
New ep: The U.S. police are historically terrible at solving murders. Why?

open.spotify.com/episode/0RZOSN…

In 1965, more than 90% of murders were cleared by arrest or exception. Today, the clearance rate has fallen to just over 50%. @Crimealytics says: Blame bad data. Then blame guns.
The murder clearance rate has declined every decade since the 1960s. It declined while crime rose for decades, when crime fell for decades, and now it's hit an all-time low.

What's happening?!



(graph via @chrishnews)
The first thing to know is that 1960s crime data is basically hogwash.

In the pre-Miranda era, the police had much less scrutiny and DAs had lower evidence standards. More innocent people were thrown in jail and large agencies often made up numbers for the FBI.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(