Ben Andrew Profile picture
Aug 19 14 tweets 4 min read
I've been revisiting several probability, statistics & clinical research concepts that I've learned through simulation & visualization over the past years. Full list pinned below - I hope this can be helpful for others who also learn this way! #epitwitter #statstwitter #RStats
Universality of the uniform / inverse transform sampling

Propensity score matching & the propensity score paradox

Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and the four "elemental confounds"

Information entropy, Kullback-Liebler divergence and the Poisson distribution

Comparison of difficulty in identifying continuous vs. dichotomous interaction effects

Interactive application for Bayesian re-analysis of clinical trial data

Bayesian analysis of RCT data to derive patient-specific efficacy estimates

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Andrew

Ben Andrew Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BenYAndrew

May 3, 2019
The assumption of normality in many statistical models refers to the model residuals and not the dependent variable. @oscar_olvera100 has a great post about this topic (linked). I tried to expand on his thoughts through some additional simulation/visualization. #epitwitter 1/n
In these examples, we’ll look at a simple linear model Y ~ X, where X is dichotomous and Y is continuous. This first plot shows, for two relative effect sizes, the distributions of:

1. Y stratified by X
2. Y without stratification
3. Residuals from the linear model Y ~ X

2/n
We can "test" the normality assumption using the Shapiro-Wilk test. We find that if we look at only the dependent variable, the normality assumption is "violated" (SW p < 0.05) when the effect size is large (Cohen's d = 2), but not for smaller effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.75). 3/n
Read 13 tweets
Apr 15, 2019
I took a crack at reworking @statsepi’s RCT adjustment post (bit.ly/2Pd1JkH) w/ added simulation & visualization. To pique interest, here is a redacted version of the final image. Stick around for a walkthrough of how to get there & what it means. #epitwitter #rstats 1/n
Let's say we are studying the effect of a treatment on a continuous outcome (Y). In this field of study, 20 continuous patient variables are commonly reported (i.e., are found in the typical table 1). 2/n
Next, let's say that 10 of these variables are causally unrelated to Y (and thus are non-predictors of Y; call these N) and 10 have true causal effects on Y (and thus are predictors of Y; call these C). 3/n
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(