Thread by @Sammie_Brown86

I am sick to death of being asked "where's the harm in using inclusive language?"
Let's consider something as simple as the definition of woman. If we are going by the "inclusive" definition, a woman is literally anyone who claims to "feel like a woman", whatever that means 🧵

By redefining this simple noun, the doors open wide for predators to gain access to vulnerable women and girls.
Not long ago, if a man entered a female space and exposed himself or leered at women, he could be arrested. He could be charged with indecent exposure and voyeurism.

The new definition of woman gives him a free pass. He is able to state that he feels like a woman today, and regardless of how he identified last week, he will escape consequences.

Worse still, if the women attempt to speak up about what happened, they will be smeared and labeled bigots and transphobes. The only way these women can be vindicated is if the man turns out to have a previous record of sexual offenses.

These records will be a thing of the past now that the new generation of pervs knows how easy it is to get away with acting out their fetishes in female spaces.

There are a number of trans people who understand this. Most refer to themselves as transsexuals and want nothing to do with the TRAs or their insidious agenda. Funnily enough, they are also smeared and labeled bigots and transphobes.

It seems anyone who recognizes the importance of safeguarding women and children is now considered a TERF. TRAs often liken TERFs to Nazis, attempting to dehumanize us. This way, they are able to justify their violent threats.

I refuse to alter my language and lie to coddle the feelings of males who couldn't possible care less about how we feel. A woman is an adult human female. That will never change, no matter how many AGPs in bad wigs will it to.