Leor Sapir Profile picture
Aug 22 8 tweets 3 min read
🚨🚨🚨 IMPORTANT: @AAPPres of the American Academy of Pediatrics (@AmerAcadPeds) just responded to our op-ed in the WSJ. This is a major step forward for those working to ensure science-based pediatric medicine.

🧵

wsj.com/articles/trans… via @WSJ
Szilagyi and the AAP now agree that "the vast majority of children" subject to "gender-affirming care" should NOT be medicalized. Indeed, according to Szilagyi, they should receive "the opposite" of hormones and surgeries. I take that to mean psychotherapy first or only.
This marks a course reversal from AAP's previous position, announced in the 2018 Pediatrics article by Rafferty et al, which explicitly called "watchful waiting" an "outdated approach" and equated it to "conversion therapy."
If the "vast majority" of these kids are not destined to transition, presumably because most will desist by adolescence, that means that medicalizing them is wrong and harmful. I thank Dr. Szilagyi for recognizing this point, and hope she can clarify it further for AAP members.
AAP's new position should also inform debate about the Biden administration's proposed Title IX rules, which will put enormous pressure on schools to facilitate "social transition," even without the involvement or consent of parents.
There is good reason to believe that social transition is iatrogenic, meaning that "affirming" a child socially with his/her preferred name and pronouns increases the chance that the cross-gender ID will persist and medical interventions will be sought.

acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
Schools are not being "supportive" or "inclusive" when they adopt "affirming" policies. Instead, they are potentially changing the course of psychosocial development and putting kids on track to becoming sterile, sexually dysfunctional, and lifelong wards of the medical industry.
It is crucial, therefore, that @USEducationDept, @SecCardona, @LHAMON, and @POTUS understand just what they are doing:

Creating a school-to-clinic pipeline, against the recommendation of the AAP.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Leor Sapir

Leor Sapir Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LeorSapir

Aug 22
AAP just tweeted this. It seems that the fundamental issue now is iatrogenesis in social transition, or in plain language, whether adults agreeing with the gender self-assessment of a child increases the chance that that child will continue to believe s/he really is that "gender"
and eventually seek hormones and surgeries.

Common sense tells us that the answer is yes.

Testimonies from parents and transition regretters tell us the answer is yes.
And research lends this conclusion further credibility.

Here is Kenneth Zucker explaining why iatrogensis is likely a genuine risk of social transition.

acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
Read 11 tweets
Aug 19
@benkesslen (@techreview) is the latest journalist to jump on the bandwagon of misinformation surrounding pediatric gender medicine.

🧵

technologyreview.com/2022/08/18/105…
Considering how easy it is to fact-check these articles into the ground, you have to wonder how much editorial oversight is being exercised here.

Kesslen claims that ROGD is a fiction and that @LisaLittman1 2018 paper in PLOS One is responsible for a spread of misinformation.
First, Littman has always recognized the limitations of her study. Her goal was to describe what appeared at the time to be a newly emerging clinical cohort of transition-seekers. She called for more research to corroborate the ROGD hypothesis.
Read 19 tweets
Aug 18
Response from @jack_turban to our piece in the @WSJopinion on the @AmerAcadPeds. Here's why Turban falls short:

🧵
1. As I've already pointed out to Turban, the Cass Report absolutely does cite improperly rushing kids to medicalization and lack of "safeguarding" as reasons to close Tavistock (Section 4.20). This has also been confirmed by practitioners at GIDS.

commonsense.news/p/how-tavistoc…
2. Turban is right that the increase in suicide attempts in his 2022 paper wasn't statistically significant. However: (a) neither were his findings regarding the drop in SERIOUS suicidality (as measured by planning/attempts/hospitalizations). He's misled the public on this.
Read 18 tweets
Aug 5
My review of @jack_turban et al's new study in Pediatrics. It is, as I write, "a new low," even in a field in which low-quality research with overstated conclusions often gets published.

city-journal.org/major-flaws-in…

🧵
Pediatrics yet again fails to exercise basic editorial oversight, with harmful consequences for children and families. Peer-review exists precisely because scholars like Turban cannot be counted on to filter out their own biases. @aap_peds @lewis_first @AmerAcadPeds
The media yet again fail to adhere to basic standards of professionalism and rigor. Even a superficial dive into Turban's study should immediately yield red flags. Yet journalists like @JoYurcaba (@NBCNews) and @bmigdon (@TheHill), and outlets @FenwayHealth, took the bait.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 20
@grace_huckins at @WIRED has a new piece out called "Gender-Affirming Care Improves Mental Health--and May Save Lives." This is a case study in poor journalism.

🧵
To her credit, Huckins acknowledges some of the main methodological weaknesses of studies purporting to find that hormonal interventions are life-saving. However, she also mischaracterizes some of the research, omits important context, and ignores criticisms.
Here is an example of Huckins mischaracterizing research. She writes: "A Finnish study that looked back at the medical charts of 52 adolescents also found significant reductions in suicidality after hormone treatment."
Read 12 tweets
Jul 20
I have officially offered to moderate a debate between Dr. Jason Rafferty, lead author of the 2018 @AmerAcadPeds policy statement on pediatric gender medicine, and Dr. James Cantor (@cantor), a critic of that statement.

🧵
In 2018, the AAP published Rafferty's "Ensuring Comprehensive Car and Support for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents" in its journal Pediatrics. Rafferty argues that "affirming" care is the only medically and ethically responsible course of treatment.
In 2019, Cantor published "Transgender and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents: Fact-Checking of AAP Policy" in the Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. Cantor argues that Rafferty's report is based on a deeply flawed and highly selective reading of the evidence.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(