In Spain, according to MoMo's age-adjusted figures, the July excess deaths as a % over baseline is 33.7%, by far the largest excess deaths in recorded history (except March and April 2020, when the pandemic hit), higher even than in any recorded winter as % over base line.
Here is the series from 2015 to 2019.
(2015 is the first year recorded by MoMo's age-adjusted excess deaths model. In that year 2015 Spain experienced one of the worst respiratory disease seasons in its recent history).
If the non-Covid excess was due to some sort of collateral damage from lockdowns, medical delays or having passed Covid, it would be unlikely that the delayed effects of that would show up in waves, synchronously in many people at once, as we see in Spain and several countries.
The largest part of the age-adjusted excess deaths in Spain since May are due to unknown causes (undisclosed by the government).
Spain: MoMo Age-adjusted Excess Deaths in % over adjusted expected deaths (since in an aging population expected deaths are >than the simple historical avg). July 2022 is the largest excess in recorded history, except for Mar-Apr 2020. Also if we exclude deaths attributed to heat
Spain: MoMo Age-adjusted Excess Deaths in % over adjusted expected deaths. July 2022 is the largest excess in recorded history, except for Mar-Apr 2020. Also if we exclude deaths attributed to heat. This extraordinary 2022 excess deaths started in May.
South Korea, a country with a pop equivalent to Spain and approximately the same latitude. With no heat or cold, Korea has had a large wave of excess deaths in Mar-Apr 2022:
Excess deaths 2022: 37,338
Non Covid Excess: 18,705
Attributed to Covid: 18,633
South Korea, with no heat or cold, it has had a large wave of excess deaths in Mar-Apr 2022. Note that in several weeks the excess was >70% (excess is calculated over 3y max).
Excess deaths 2022: 37,338
Non Covid Excess: 18,705
Attributed to Covid: 18,633 kosis.kr/covid_eng/stat…
Until 2022 Korea had virtually no excess deaths from Covid or other causes. This spring it has experienced a strong wave of excess deaths (Covid & non-Covid) quite equivalent to that of Spain in 2020. But Korea is now almost 90% vaccinated and 78% have 3 doses(highest with Japan)
Japan has the highest % of third doses (84%). Like many other countries (each at different times), in 2022 Japan shows a significant non-covid excess deaths off-season: mainly between Feb and April, 32,449 died in excess from non-covid causes.
If heat were the cause of excess deaths in Europe, Portugal should have ~the same excess as Spain and, although the excess there has been significant, it has not been as extraordinary as in Spain (since April). And what about excesses in Korea or Japan at other times of the year?
NEW ZEALAND
Latitude Wellington: -41.276
Population: 4,907,888
Median age: 38,0 years
Vaccines 2/3 doses: 84% – 63%
Excess Deaths 2022 (up to July 27): 2,704
Non-Covid excess deaths: 1,420
Attributed to Covid: 1,284
Spain vs. New Zealand
2022 weekly all cause excess deaths in % over baseline of the two antipodean countries. Excess deaths have been on an upward trend in both countries since quite early in the year (NZ earlier).
Now comparing Spain, New Zealand and S. Korea. In the three countries ~half of the excess is due to non-Covid causes. Korea's wave of excess deaths is extraordinary. As we saw earlier in the thread, it's equivalent to Spain's first wave in 2020 (which had been one of the largest)
I'm extremely surprised that the media are only giving the "scoop" on Spain's historic excess deaths only now, at the end of August, when the excess began its almost unchanged escalation on week 13, ending April 3. As detailed above, >50% is from unknown, non-Covid or heat causes
For those who don't see anything wrong in the "derivative data" (excess deaths), perhaps more convincing is the official graph produced by the Spanish government with raw numbers of registered deaths.
Source: momo.isciii.es/panel_momo/#se…
Full presentation here: dropbox.com/s/7e0iswcttoh9…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BLACK SUN
Yo he visto cosas que vosotros no creeríais. Atacar ciudades en llamas más allá de Odessa. He visto rayos ionizantes brillar en la oscuridad cerca de la Puerta de Brandeburgo. Arcos voltaicos sobre el Partenón de Atenas.
He visto cosas que os helarían la sangre, escenas de un mundo reducido a cenizas tras la guerra nuclear, donde las ciudades dejaron de ser hogares y se convirtieron en tumbas ardientes.
He contemplado el Mar del Norte y el Mar Báltico que se alzaron furiosos, contaminados por el veneno radiactivo, devorando las costas desde los Países Bajos hasta Finlandia, arrasando las costas y ciudades del norte de Europa.
Trump ha nombrado Director del NIH a mi amigo Jay Battacharia, Catedrático de Salud Pública en Stanford.
Enhorabuena Jay! Muy merecido!
El director del NIH en la pandemia quiso descalificar a Jay llamándole "fringe epidemiologist". Irónicamente, ahora Jay será el director del NIH
El NIH era reconocido como uno de los principales impulsores de investigación médica y científica mundial y una de las fuentes fiables de datos sobre salud pública y medicina. Pero en el Covid se había convertido en el principal instrumento de manipulación de la opinión pública.
Trump otorga expresamente el mando a Jay Battacharia de poner orden en la salud pública de EEUU, en colaboración con Robert Kennedy, restableciendo el NIH como el modelo internacional que fue para la ciencia y la medicina basada en la evidencia.
Valencia: Nada distinto de otras veces. El cambio climático no mata. Mata la ineptitud de los gobernantes: (1) Falta de aviso eficaz a la población (2) Urbanización desde hace décadas en zonas inundables (3) Falta de inversión en infraestructuras (4) Falta de limpieza de cauces
Como en muchas otras tragedias naturales, sanitarias, o económicas, la culpa es de los gobiernos, ineptos o corruptos, no del cambio climático (y mucho menos de la "huella de carbono" de la clase trabajadora).
Ni en España ni en Valencia los eventos de grandes lluvias han aumentado desde que hay registros oficiales. Lo que ha aumentado es la urbanización en las zonas que recurrentemente se inundan, y la ineptitup de los políticos.
Máximo en 1982 (presa de Tous): aemetblog.es/2023/11/13/rad…
Neither in Spain nor in the province of Valencia is there any increase in the frequency or intensity of torrential rainfall events (defined as those greater than 100lt/m2 in 24h). If there is any trend, it is downward. The causes of the great catastrophe in Valencia are political
The causes have nothing to do with anthropogenic climate change. They are all political: (1) Lack of ‘effective’ and timely warning to the population. (2) Urbanisation in areas that have been flooded for decades (3) Lack of investment in infrastructure and cleaning of wadi beds.
Valencia. Zonas cero: Picanya, Paiporta, Benetússer, Sedaví, Alfafar, Massanassa, Catarroja. Solo los dos últimos están calificados como inundables por la Generalitat. El barranco del Poyo, muy urbanizado, tiene capacidad para 1800 m3/sg. El 29 octubre se desbordó con 2300 m3/sg.
Estas inundaciones no son nuevas. El 14 oct. 1957 ocurrió una igual o mayor. Lo que es nuevo es la gran de urbanización que hay ahora alrededor de las ramblas. En la foto de las obras del nuevo cauce del Turia se ve lo poco urbanizado que estaba el sur de la ciudad de Valencia.
Los medios repiten una y otra vez que la catástrofe de Valencia se debe al cambio climático. Por dramático que haya sido y esté siendo el evento, esa afirmación no se compadece con los datos.
On Sept 19, many newspapers published the latest scientific paper that maintains that the Earth is at its coldest point in the last 485 million years, but at the same time conveying the three classic alarmist messages: today is too hot, it is man-made and there are no precedents.
The Washington Post, El Mundo, and many others worlwide published summaries of said study the same day (Sept 19, 2024), indicating a synchronized press campaign. However, some like El Mundo did not dare to include the above graph, perhaps because of how incoherent it is.
The first message that the current temp is too high is false: it is the coldest of the last 485My. That the warming is man-made is debatable and discussed. That it is unprecedented is false, there have been many times when the temperature rose much faster. dropbox.com/scl/fi/fgguob8…