Lion Hirth Profile picture
Aug 24, 2022 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Cal-23 #TTF prices have topped 250 €/MWh this week. Everyone agrees that’s crazy, but what does that mean?

Some have suggested to cap the price, i.e. set an administrative price cap on the European wholesale market for gas. What would happen then?
First, supply.

North-West European gas markets have been decoupled from the world market around April.

Russian supply does not respond to prices, Norwegian supply is running at full capacity, and so are LNG terminals. We are an island. And will remain one well into 2023.
Second, price formation.

This implies prices are currently set by demand. That means, prices rise until demand is reduced enough to match whatever supply is there.
Third, a price cap.

If you put a legal ceiling on the price for gas, demand will exceed supply. Any price cap must come along with additional policies that reduce demand accordingly. If that comes too late, we will be physically running out of gas like sooner or later.
Forth, no price cap.

What if reverse the order? *First* do the savings policy and *then* introduce the price cap? Here comes the magic: If you reduce consumption by the same amount that you need to do anyway, prices will fall automatically, without the need to introduce a cap.
Bottom line: If you introduce a gas price cap, you need to introduce savings policies. If you introduce those savings policies, the cap is obsolete. End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lion Hirth

Lion Hirth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LionHirth

Mar 19
Unsere neue Studie

Mehrwert dezentraler Flexibilität

Oder: Was kostet die verschleppte Flexibilisierung von Wärmepumpen, Elektroautos und Heimspeichern?

Studie, Slides, Webinar:

Kernergebnisse 👇 neon.energy/mehrwert-flex
Image
Wir schließen in den kommenden Jahren eine atemberaubende Menge neuer Verbraucher in der Niederspannung an.

In den nächsten 20 Jahren rund 500 GW EVs, Wärmepumpen & Heimspeicher

Gut oder schlecht fürs Stromsystem? Kommt darauf an: ob wir die dumm oder intelligent betreiben. Image
Deshalb diese Studie.

Wir haben diese drei Technologien in typischer Ausgestaltung anhand von drei Tarifmodellen optimiert:
· Festpreis
· Halb-Flex (dynamischer Tarif, der stündliche Spotpreise widerspiegelt)
· Voll-Flex (dynamisch plus zeitvariable Netzentgelte) Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 23, 2023
In der aktuellen Diskussion um regionale Unterschiede beim Strompreis geht einiges durcheinander.

(Beispiel von gestern: )

Hier ein Versuch, den Nebel ein wenig zu lichten👇spiegel.de/wirtschaft/net…
Für private Haushalte besteht der Strompreis im Wesentlichen aus zwei Komponenten: Die Kosten der Energie ("Beschaffung") und Netzentgelte. Image
1) Energie-Kosten spiegel den Preis von Strom an der Börse wieder.

2) Netzentgelte leiten die Versorger an den Netzbetreiber weiter. Die Höhe und Struktur der Netzentgelte werden im Rahmen der staatlichen Regulierung durch die Bundesnetzagentur festgelegt.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 23, 2023
EU electricity market reform

One of the stickiest points in the EMD file is Art 66a. It describes when an electricity price crisis is declared & what happens then.

I find the whole approach of the Article inconsistent and counterproductive for the overall reform.

Here is why👇 twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Start with the trigger: A crisis will be declared if wholesale prices go up (how much exactly is still debated).

That’s odd because the overall reform centers around long-term contracts (PPAs, CfDs) that isolate consumers from wholesale price shocks.
So we might declare a crisis even if no one is hurt.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 22, 2023
Electricity market design

It is my impression that behind all the fighting about CfDs, PPAs, peak shaving products and crisis intervention lies a fundamental disagreement:

What is the purpose of electricity markets? What is the objective that they serve?
Behind the statements of many senior policy makers seems the assumption that power markets are primarily social policy and should be designed to avoid energy poverty.

Or industrial policy, securing competitiveness of energy-intensive industry and keeping firms in Europe.
Or redistributive policy, where power markets should be designed to capture rents from firms that don’t deserve it.

Or monetary policy: power markets should help bring down headline inflation rates. (This one surprised me most.)
Read 7 tweets
Mar 27, 2023
Wärmepumpe vs Wasserstoff

Eine verworrene Diskussion - es geht ja auch im komplexe System-Fragen: Netze, Speicher, Dunkelflaute, Infrastruktur, Lernkurven, Pfadabhängigkeit, etc.

Wenn man den ganzen Nebel mal zur Seite schiebt, ist es im Kern jedoch eigentlich ganz einfach:👇
Mit einer Wärmepumpe macht man aus einer kWh Strom rund 3 kWh nutzbare Wärme. Wenn man die gleiche kWh in einem Elektrolyseur zu Wasserstoff umwandelt und dann in einer Gastherme verbrennt, bekommt man nur 0.5 kWh Raumwärme.

Faktor 6 Unterschied!
Das heißt auch, dass man 6 mal mehr Windräder braucht, 6 Mal mehr Stahl und seltene Erden und eben auch 6 Mal mehr an Kosten für die Stromerzeugung ausgibt.
Read 10 tweets
Mar 21, 2023
Some people don't like wind turbines. You may or may not be one of them. But how should we account for this fact in energy system modeling?

Our answer: include disamenity costs in cost-potential curves.

New paper out: link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Cost-potential curves show how much wind energy you can get at what cost.

Usually, they include only engineering cost. We've added disamenity costs, translating the fact that some people don't like turbines into monetary values.
Our core finding is dual:

1) If you ignore people and build turbines where it is cheapest, you will annoy many neighbors and destroy welfare

2) If disamenties are taken into account when deciding where to build turbines, they remain small
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(