The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Aug 24, 2022 24 tweets 8 min read Read on X
A brief guide to Soviet architecture: Image
The architecture of the Soviet Union (1922-1991) is interesting because it represents a highly conscious effort to build a different world.

The old aphorism that "we shape our buildings and they shape us" was taken as gospel by the architects of the Communist revolution...
The first stage of Soviet architecture is known as Constructivism, which dominated in the 1920s and early 1930s.

Constructivism rejected everything neoclassical and neogothic. It was abstract, industrial, and futuristic.

(Svoboda Factory Club, 1928) Image
There was something Utopian about this style of architecture. The Soviets believed they could reshape human nature, and their early architecture speaks to this risky conviction. It was, intentionally, unlike anything that had come before.

(Zuyev Workers' Club, 1929) Image
Then came Postconstructivism in the mid-1930s, a brief and minor transitional phase from the industrial futurism of Constructivism to a more familiar, neoclassical style.

This apartment block sits somewhere between the two: Image
And the Opera and Ballet Theatre in Minsk, from 1938, perfectly encapsulates this transition.

It still has the futuristic angles of Constructivism, but its use of columns and entablatures is a clearly classical design-choice. Image
And so, the second major phase of Soviet architecture was Stalinism, which did turn to the past for inspiration, particularly from classical architecture - but with a unique Soviet spin.

Consider the entrance to the Exhibition of Achievements of National Economy, opened in 1935: Image
This arch sits in the uncanny valley. It *sort of* looks like a Roman triumphal arch, or any number of neoclassical arches... but there's something off about it.

See the Arch of Constantine, from 315 AD, for comparison: Image
Here's a good way to understand Stalinist architecture:

The Soviets demolished the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in 1931, a symbol of everything communism opposed.

(This, if it was needed, is a stark reminder of the importance of architecture and the message it sends.) ImageImage
And this is what it was supposed to have been replaced by... the Palace of the Soviets. Image
Stalinist architecture has also been called Socialist Classicism.

That makes sense, as we saw with the Exhibition arch above.

Here's the Red Army Theatre, started in 1934 and finished in 1940. Constructivism was well and truly gone. Image
One of the crowning achievements of Stalinist architecture was the Moscow Metro.

It was an eclectic mix of historical styles, ranging from futurism to Art Deco to Baroque to neoclassicism.

Solniki, one the first stations (1935), has a simple Art Deco design: Image
While Elektrozavodskaya Station, opened in 1944, takes that up a notch: Image
Meanwhile, Komsomolskaya Station is shamelessly Baroque, harking back to the florid ornamentation of the 18th century: Image
By the late 1950s, however, the richness and decadence of Stalinist architecture had become problematic.

Consider VDNKh station, completed in 1958. Notice how much of the ornament in something like Komsomolskaya has been stripped away. Image
The other legacy of Stalinist architecture was these monumental skyscrapers, modelled on the original "Seven Sisters" built in Moscow between 1947 and 1953.

These combined the Baroque, the Classical, and even the Gothic into colossal Soviet castles: Image
And the Seven Sisters were imitated across the USSR, as in Warsaw's Palace of Culture and Science, completed in 1955: Image
But, as time went on, Stalinist architecture and Socialist Classicism faded away.

Nikita Khrushchev openly condemned Stalinist "excess", and Soviet architecture underwent a third stylistic change in the 1960s.

It swung back to a more modern and austere style: Image
This wasn't just an ideological shift; it was also economic, because Stalinist architecture was expensive.

Consider the typical copy-and-paste Soviet apartment blocks. These were cheap and easy to build.

This model originates in the 1960s, and was known as Khrushchyovka: Image
And they were succeeded by "Brezhnevkas" in the 1970s and 1980s, which were much taller and larger.

This trend of cheap, standardised, concrete high-rises has come to define late Soviet architecture. Image
But this stylistic shift also led the USSR to embrace Brutalism, albeit a little later than in the West.

Here is the Buzluzhda Monument in Bulgaria (1981), and the Transport Ministry in Georgia (1974): ImageImage
While the House of the Soviets in Moscow and the National Palace of Culture in Bulgaria, both completed in 1981, represent the height of post-Stalinist Soviet architecture.

But they are vaguely Constructivist. The architectural journey had come full circle... ImageImage
And that's a brief introduction to Soviet architecture.

It's a unique era from which we can learn about how architecture is used to shape society, send political messages, and influence ordinary people.

And also how architectural styles flow and react to one another over time.
If you enjoyed this brief guide to Soviet architecture then you may like my free weekly newsletter, Areopagus.

Seven short lessons every Friday, including art, architecture, history, and classical music.

Consider subscribing here:
culturaltutor.com/areopagus

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(