AND WE'VE WON our case against Government anti-protest laws that completely ignored the will of Parliament
Last summer Suella Braverman changed the definition of “serious disruption” to mean “more than minor” – giving police almost unlimited powers to shut down protests
We said this move was
UNDEMOCRATIC
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
UNACCEPTABLE
And today, the Court has said it was UNLAWFUL
No matter where we’re from, our backgrounds, or who we vote for, most of us want our elected leaders to work within the law and not abuse their powers
Our parliamentary democracy exists to make sure a government can’t just do whatever it wants
Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman made anti-protest laws she had no power to create
So we’re in court today to #DefendDemocracy
Last summer Suella Braverman changed the definition of “serious disruption” to mean “more than minor” – giving police almost unlimited powers to shut down protests
She had no power to do this
Parliament had rejected it when Gov tried to insert it into the Public Order Bill
No matter where we’re from, our backgrounds, or who we vote for, most of us want our elected leaders to work within the law and not abuse their powers
Our parliamentary democracy exists to make sure a government can’t just do whatever it wants
The Government is changing spy laws to protect freedom of the press after Liberty’s legal challenge
Following our 7-year legal challenge supported by @NUJofficial, Gov's agreed to bring in new safeguards to protect journalists from having confidential material - eg communications with sources - easily accessed by state bodies libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/governme…
Currently, the Investigatory Powers Act allows bodies like MI5 and MI6 to search for and keep confidential journalistic material from data they collect when bulk hacking devices – without independent authorisation