Jamison Foser Profile picture
Aug 25 12 tweets 4 min read
This is an extraordinarily misleading thread from a @NYTimes reporter. In fact, the application was for Johns Hopkins *night courses for technical workers.*

President Biden's statement is accurate and this thread is a deeply dishonest suggestion to the contrary.

(1/X)
Many people have pointed this out to the author of the thread. Example:

And the author of the thread has seen the requests for retraction or clarification, but he refuses.

This just extremely irresponsible behavior, and misleading to the point of dishonesty. Congratulations, @NYTimes. You've done it again.
"Joe Biden says his dad didn't go to college but ACTUALLY his dad took some night school classes" is some world-class bullshit.
you'll not soon find a better example of the corporate media holding Democrats to a much higher, often completely nonsensical, standard than Republicans. This is literally a NY Times reporter posting 80-year-old documents to establish that Joe Biden's dad took night classes.
A REPUBLICAN: The moon is made out of green cheese. Also I own the moon.

A DEMOCRAT: I'm proud to be the first in my family to go to college.

NEW YORK TIMES: Actually this Democrat's great-uncle Larry attended a 1938 basketball game played at the City College of New York.
New York Times reporters will put more effort into investigating Biden’s dad’s night school attendance than into investigating whether Iraq had WMD.
GEORGE W BUSH: Iraq has nukes so we’re gonna start a war.

NEW YORK TIMES: *fist-pump* Fuck yeah!

JOE BIDEN: My dad didn’t go to college.

NEW YORK TIMES: After exhaustive research we have uncovered an 80+ year-old-document that doesn’t disprove this but c’mon Biden’s lying.
If you have enjoyed this thread you might also enjoy this other thread in which a New York Times editor tells me it is OK for Bret Stephens to blame conditions depicted in a video on progressive policies and politicians not in place prior to the filming of the video.
On one hand we have Biden's dad's application for non-degree night school classes at Johns Hopkins. On the other, a wedding announcement that refers to him having gone to JH. Pretending the latter is more precise or reliable than the former is a lie.
I use the word "lie" quite deliberately here. It's wildly implausible that a professional investigative reporter actually believes the wedding announcement is more precise or reliable than the actual formal application for non-degree night classes.
Usually when a journalist at a publication like the New York Times steps on a rake, you see other journalists leap to his defense. It's a club, after all. Telling that you don't see anyone defending his bullshit about Biden's dad & Johns Hopkins.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jamison Foser

Jamison Foser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jamisonfoser

Aug 9
Facebook's new chatbot makes false and offensive statements -- but it's cool, 'cause Facebook tells you that in advance:
three questions in and the Facebook AI chatbot has brought up The Rothschilds
Facebook's AI chatbot is going great:
Read 11 tweets
Aug 9
Classic case of privileging the lie, from Politico. No, "without any evidence" doesn't make it ok; they're still centering the BS claims and failing to explain that in fact the GOP reaction itself undermines the rule of law. That should be the focus; instead it is omitted.
The Republican position is that investigating Trump is inherently illegitimate. That position is a literal, explicit, definitional assault on the rule of law. Yet it isn't being covered as such; instead, media are playing along with it.
This, for example, is undeniably an assault on the rule of law.

News companies that portray Republicans as *warning* about undermining the rule of law rather than correctly portraying them as *undermining the rule of law* are helping Republicans undermine the rule of law.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 9
Here’s a subtle but important way journalists editorialize, from Politico.

This is not something one can “note.” “Noted” connotes an observation of a true thing. This is not that. It is a prediction. It’s like “noting” that the Cowboys will cover the spread.
(Also predictions of election outcomes more than two years away are of extremely little value in general, but note that this one comes from a purported expert in law, not politics, so why Politico thinks it carries any weight is beyond me.)
Incidentally I came across that passage because it was eagerly lapped up by this paste-brained grifter in a desperate attempt to pander to the worst people in the world:
Read 4 tweets
Aug 9
Just gonna leave these here.
Why are these two sentences three paragraphs apart?
Read 4 tweets
Jul 28
don't make me say it
Andrew Yang, the answer to a question nobody asked. Christie Todd Whitman, the fourth most noteworthy Republican governor of 1995. And literally dozens more!
literally no staff
Read 8 tweets
Jul 15
Something I wish this @michaelschaffer piece bout Teixeira leaving CAP addressed: There have *always* been default assumptions about how you talk about things like this. The old guard was perfectly comfortable when the defaults were more conservative. politico.com/news/magazine/…
To the extent that there are “defaults” in how you talk about these things, I would argue that it isn’t necessarily the existence of defaults that bothers people like Teixeira, it’s that they no longer have as much control over the defaults as they are accustomed to.
And of course the themes of this mini thread apply much more broadly than to just the relatively small world of left-leaning DC think tanks.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(