This is an extraordinary 🧵 in which a Russian soldier complains about his treatment at the hands of his officer and confesses to a murder - exactly the same murder which, by total coincidence, I described in a piece from the village of Andriivka, west of Kyiv, months ago.
I was taken by @jackhillphoto to the garden in the village where he had photographed the body of Ruslan Yeremchuk. From that start, we built up a picture of life in Andriivka and neighbouring villages while it was home to the famous Russia "column of tanks" in March-April.
Yeremchuk was one of three men shot in the back of the head as suspected informers on the same day. Frolkin, the Russian soldier, was traced months later - he took a selfie on a stolen phone which he left behind, and facial recognition to a journalist to his social media page.
In the interview described in this thread, he confesses to being part of the hit squad that on their colonel's orders killed the three men, and to having fired the shot that killed Yeremchuk.
Reassuringly, the interview (and that with another soldier from the same unit) confirms pretty much all the details of events in the village as Jack and I reconstructed them weeks after the Russians left. Our original story here: thetimes.co.uk/article/partis…
Britain rightly condemns the hijacking of a Ryanair flight and the arrest of Roman Protasevich. But are we entirely innocent? Has everyone forgotten that what happened here is a carbon copy of a similar incident in 2010? (1/n)
On February 23 2010, a passenger plane flying from Dubai to Bishkek airport in Kyrgyzstan was forced to land in similar circumstances - jets threatening it - and came down at Bandar Abbas airport. Iranian security forces boarded it.
They led away Abdolmalek Rigi, the leader of Jundullah, an opposition group in Iranian Balochistan (Pakistan border region). He was tried, gave a televised confession to working for the CIA, and was hanged.
This is not a coup nor is it comparable to what happens in "failed states" or developing world countries. As @kshaheen says, it's a bit insulting to say it is.
The army is not seizing power (it's resisting an illegal seizure of power, apparently). The army and police haven't taken over the television stations.
Nor is a president using military force to stay in power (presumably... and for the time being at least). The army and police haven't opened fire on anybody.
US sends an aircraft carrier to the Middle East to counter Iran: a thread. Lots of spin to counter here, which shouldn't be surprising because military posture is 50pc smoke and mirrors, something worth remembering.
USS Abraham Lincoln is in fact already on its way to the ME. It's no big deal - militarily. You might think from statement by John Bolton this was a rare event - in fact USS John C. Stennis was in the Gulf last month. (2) whitehouse.gov/briefings-stat…
However, I've also seen commentary that downplays the statement, saying that it's not a change in military strategy but just piggy-backing on a pre-ordained rotation. But that's also wrong imho - because the statement IS the change in strategy.
The true story about Corbyn's wreath-laying that no-one seems to want to mention is that he laid his wreath at the grave of a man who was killed by Abu Nidal Organisation on Saddam Hussein's orders for working for the CIA.
Salah Khaled, aka Abu Iyad, may or may not have been the boss of Black September, which carried out Munich in 1972 - almost certainly was, according to numerous accounts.
But he and Arafat shut down Black September not long after. According to one "fanciful but who knows" account he de-radicalised its foot-soldiers by giving them cash (and brides) to marry.