Thread by @lwoodhouse

WaPo is *still* calling #Beaglegate a "baseless conspiracy theory." This is in ref to 6 beagle torture experiments funded by NIAID, 5 of which NIAID *and WaPo* concede were indeed funded by NIAID, and 1 of which NIAID disputed funding, AFTER a published paper said they funded it.

https://twitter.com/yabutaleb7/status/1561730616600809472

WRT that 1 experiment, there's lots of reason to question NIAID's claim that it didn't fund it, starting with the fact that the editor of the journal that pubbed the study and then retracted its attribution of NIAID funding IS HERSELF A BEAGLE TORTURER WHO WORKS FOR ANTHONY FAUCI

Here's the details of WaPo's shoddy and obsequious reporting on the subject, which I wrote up last year. leightonwoodhouse.substack.com/p/did-nih-lie-…

This, by the way, is how WaPo reporter @bethreinhard framed up the story she was working on in her email to the beagle experimenters. WaPo already had its verdict even before it began its investigation into the experimenters' sudden about face on who funded their work.

I'm a 100% biased source BTW, both as someone who's ethically against animal experimentation and who recently joined White Coat Waste Project's advisory board. So don't take my word for it. Instead, interrogate my reporting to find any factual flaws. whitecoatwaste.org/wcw-team/#tab_…