Bispecifics for myeloma are promising. As I said earlier, I’d like them all get accelerated approval.
But as clinicians we must swiftly adjust dosing schedule & be watchful to risk of severe infections & other cancers that can occur with prolonged T cell suppression. #IMS2022
Overall survival is a composite endpoint. It not only depends on efficacy but also safety.
At this meeting talking to colleagues, I am increasingly aware of the risk of serious infections with these agents.
As @TomBmt133 pointed out severe infections and deaths due to infections with bispecifics and CART must be considered possibly related to therapy and not classified as unrelated.
As we move bispecifics & CART to frontline we must monitor survival outcomes in a continuous reassessment model. We know the benchmark survival rates at 1 and 2 years. So even if trials are not designed for OS endpoint we need to make sure that the benchmarks are met or exceeded.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dr. Thierry Facon making a compelling argument for autologous stem cell transplant for newly diagnosed myeloma. @Myeloma_Society#IMS2022
For high risk myeloma, its important to consider early transplant in the frontline setting.
For standard risk myeloma, we continue to prefer early transplant but in certain circumstance can delay transplant until first relapse accommodating patients’ wishes & life circumstances
For patients achieving MRD negative with induction therapy alone, early and delayed transplant gives similar outcomes. Thus an MRD directed approach to timing of transplant may the way of the future. Agree with @mvmateos#IMS2022
This is the kind of lawsuit that makes people lose even more faith in the Pharmaceutical industry.
We have a pandemic costing millions of lives. And this is what their concern is? nbcnews.com/health/health-…
When so many including me were thanking Moderna, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca for rapidly producing vaccines, we were also defending you from those who alleged you were solely doing this for profit.
I cannot defend you any more.
I was disappointed and upset that companies were not transferring technology and resources to make vaccines available for poor countries.
I am even more upset now. It clearly looks like the profit you made in your mind was not adequate enough. Seriously?
Although we have multiple options to treat myeloma, the number of highly effective drug classes are few and just not enough.
We continue to have an unmet need for relapsed myeloma. We continue to need accelerated approval by the FDA. @Rfonsi1@NorthTxMSG#IMS2022#IMS2022VR 1/
We also need accelerated approval of multiple drugs of the same class because patients tolerate one better than the other, and sometimes one works better than the other. It is also important to have competition to foster more innovation and to have some effect on price.
2/
The fact we have made so much progress in myeloma does not mean we don’t need more drugs.
Myeloma remains a serious malignancy and we continue to have unmet needs. So I will continue to advocate for rapid approval of new drugs.
3/
COVID vaccines were developed in record time against the origins wild strain 2 years ago. The virus has since mutated multiple times. We need the modified boosters to protect lives.