Kamil Galeev Profile picture
Aug 28, 2022 26 tweets 11 min read Read on X
@RheinmetallAG responded to my last thread about their participation in construction of Mulino training ground where Putin trained and is still training his army for the war in Ukraine. And yet, I feel that their answer is misleading (to say the least). So I'll add some context🧵
To start with, @RheinmetallAG claims that they simply provided the "simulation technology" for the Mulino project. The audience may think you were just one of many subcontractors. But that's not what your own press release from 2011 says. It's about winning an order to *build* it
This, according to your own words, "state of the art training centre" was modelled after the Bundewehr facility in Altmark and represented "the German defence industry's first significant foothold in the Russian market". You hoped for more follow up orders from Russia
This remark may be hard for a layman to interpret. Why exactly did you hope for more follow up orders? Because of the "plans to modernise the equipment of the Russian armed forces".

What did you mean by that?

"Plans to modernise the equipment" = Serdyukov's reforms
Since Sergeyev's era, the land army was in low priority within the Russian armed forces. Sergeyev himself used to be the commander of Strategic Rocket Forces. In 1997 when he became a minister resources of the Russian army were very limited. So he invested it all into the rockets
Spend-it-all-on-rockets strategy brought its fruits. In 2000, Russia got the first fully Russian intercontinental ballistic missile - Topol-M. All the previous analogues were either built in Ukraine or had lots of Ukrainian components. Sergeyev managed to import substitute them
That gives context for the "import substitution" discourse. Russia indeed managed to do its import substitution. Over the three decades they mostly substituted Ukrainian components, that Russian missiles and aircraft industries used to be totally dependent upon. Great success
It was only the minister Serdyukov appointed in 2007 who for the first time prioritised the Russian land army. No wonder, in 2007 Serdyukov had *way* more cash than Sergeyev could dream of in 1997. Putin pumped hella lots of the oil revenue into the military
In 1997 Sergeyev had to save *something* with minimal budgets. So he chose to save strategic rockets and allowed the rest to rot

In 2007 Serdyukov had to improve the military with new massive budgets. So he focused on the inadequate land army, rather than on already good rockets
Two things were special about the Serdyukov's ministry:

1. No other minister put so much focus on the land army
2. No other minister was so enthusiastic about the direct import of weaponry and ready solutions from the West. Most importantly, from Germany
In June 2011 Serdyukov visited the German Army combat training centre in Letzlingen with the Russian ministry of defence delegation (see the photo). Here they signed contract with the Rheinmetall AG to build a training centre in Mulino, Russia

Source
dw.com/ru/партнеры-по…
Why Rheinmetall though? Well, that's the leading defence company which had already built a Bundeswehr training centre in Altmark. Now they promised to build a superior version in Russia, clearly hoping to signs more contracts with this import-friendly minister
Simulation technology would be one of the key features of this centre. For example, instead of the real ammo they would use lasers. Much cheaper (= you can train more often), safer, easier to track and analyse. Therefore, easier to see and amend one's mistakes after the training
Just a minor detail. In the German center Mulino was modelled after, they used special simulation gas masks. Soldiers would often loosen their masks during the training, making it easier to breathe. But simulation masks had pressure sensors that would detect it. No BS approach
To be fair, Serdyukov aimed to import useful equipment from other countries as well. He placed orders for the French Mistral-class amphibious assault ships, Italian Iveco Light Multirole Vehicle. He even planned to buy Italian wheeled tanks (at the anger of Russian producers)
The clueless or the liars argue that it was the "corruption scandal" that led to the Serdyukov's downfall. Absolutely deranged idea. In most cases "corruption"a pretext, a rhetorical smoke curtain to hide the real reason. In this case, the anger of military industrial lobby
Since 2000 Putin consolidated the military industry into a number of mega-holdings. Roskosmos is doing ballistic missiles, Almaz Antey - air defence, KTRV - cruise missiles, Rosatom - nuclear warheads. But the largest, the most powerful and most eclectic one is Rostec
If other Russian defence mega holdings have some clear specialisation or focus, Rostec does not. It's eclectic, it's about everything. To put it simply, its CEO Chemezov swallowed (often through hostile takeovers, etc) everything he could. That's why Rostec is about everything
Back then Rostec hadn't swallowed all the land army production (as it has by now). But it was already a gigantic producer in this field. That's why Serdyukov's switching-to-import strategy was so risky for Serdyukov's career. He was making too many enemies
In 2007 created a JSC Oboronservis. This state-owned company had to receive the military from the non-military functions. Construction, repairment, energy - all of this functions were taken from the military and given to this daughter company of the ministry of defence
Serdyukov's mistress and Chief of Staff Vasilyeva was at the Oboronservis board of directors. Some argued this affair was his major mistake. He divorced his wife, a daughter of Putin's close friend and ex-prime minister Zubkov for Vasilyeva. Thad didn't win him more friends
In 2012 Vasilyeva's apartment where she lived with Serdyukov was searched, as well as homes of Serdyukov and his aides from the Ministry of Defence. They were all accused of corruption (Oboronservis case). Many of these accusations were probably true. Still, it was a pretext
To execute the Mulino project, Rheinmetall "entered into a strategic partnership with JSC Oboronservis". Oboronservis would serve as the general contractor and later operate the facility on behalf of the Russian army

Why? Because Oboronservis was Serdyukov's wallet
Serdyukov created the JSC Oboronservis and made it his wallet. Construction, repairment, maintenance: this company was getting all the juicy contracts the Ministry of Defense had. That's why the Rheinmetall AG concluded the "strategic partnership" for building Mulino with them
In Serdyukov's era JSC Oboronservis accumulated lots of nice contracts. But Serdyukov's downfall and the Oboronservis case gave this name a bad reputation. So in 2014 they rebranded to the Гарнизон (Garnison) company. And continued to build Mulino in the same capacity. The end
PS After 2014 Rheinmetall "left" Mulino to the "Garnison" (=Oboronservis). Thankfully, import genius allows to trace where Гарнизон was importing stuff from. It's all from Germany, Rheinmetall AG making the lion share

It looks as Garnison was merely a proxy for Rheinmetall

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kamil Galeev

Kamil Galeev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kamilkazani

Nov 2
For decades, any resistance to the Reaganomics has been suppressed using the false dichotomy: it is either “capitalism” (= which meant Reaganomics) or socialism, and socialism doesn’t work

Now, as there is the growing feeling that Reaganomics don’t work, the full rehabilitation of socialism looks pretty much inevitable
I find it oddly similar to how it worked in the USSR. For decades, the whole propaganda apparatus had been advancing the false dichotomy: it is either socialism, or capitalism (= meaning robber barons)
Now, as there is a growing feeling that the current model does not work, we must try out capitalism instead. And, as capitalism means robber barons, we must create robber barons

We have to distribute all the large enterprises between the organized crime members. This is the way
Read 4 tweets
Oct 29
Truth is: the words like Rus/Russian had many and many ambiguous and often mutually exclusive meanings, and not only throughout history, but, like, simultaneously.

For example, in the middle ages, the word "Rus" could mean:
1. All the lands that use Church Slavonic in liturgy. That is pretty much everything from what is now Central Russia, to what is now Romania. Wallachians, being the speakers of a Romance language were Orthodox, and used Slavonic in church -> they're a part of Rus, too
2. Some ambiguous, undefined region that encompasses what is now northwest Russia & Ukraine, but does not include lands further east. So, Kiev & Novgorod are a part of Rus, but Vladimir (-> region of Moscow) isn't

These two mutually exclusive notions exist simultaneously
Read 6 tweets
Oct 27
The greatest Western delusion about China is, and always has been, greatly exaggerating the importance of plan. Like, in this case, for example. It sounds as if there is some kind of continuous industrial policy, for decades

Which is a huuuuuuge misrepresentation of reality
It is more like:

1. Mao Zedong dies. His successors be like, wow, he is dead. Now we can build a normal, sane economy. That means, like in the Soviet Union

2. Fuck, we run out of oil. And the entire development plan was based upon an assumption that we have huge deposits of it
3. All the prior plans of development, and all the prior industrial policies go into the trashbin. Because again, they were based upon an assumption that we will be soon exporting more oil than Saudi Arabia, and without that revenue we cannot fund our mega-projects
Read 14 tweets
Oct 9
Yes. Behind all the breaking news about the capture of small villages, we are missing the bigger pattern which is:

The Soviet American war was supposed to be fought to somewhere to the west of Rhine. What you got instead is a Soviet Civil War happening to the east of Dnieper
If you said that the battles of the great European war will not be fought in Dunkirk and La Rochelle, but somewhere in Kupyansk (that is here) and Rabotino, you would have been once put into a psych ward, or, at least, not taken as a serious person Image
The behemoth military machine had been built, once, for a thunderbolt strike towards the English Channel. Whatever remained from it, is now decimating itself in the useless battles over the useless coal towns of the Donetsk Oblast
Read 6 tweets
Sep 7
Yes, and that is super duper quadruper important to understand

Koreans are poor (don't have an empire) and, therefore, must do productive work to earn their living. So, if the Americans want to learn how to do anything productive they must learn it from Koreans etc
There is this stupid idea that the ultra high level of life and consumption in the United States has something to do with their productivity. That is of course a complete sham. An average American doesn't do anything useful or important to justify (or earn!) his kingly lifestyle
The kingly lifestyle of an average American is not based on his "productivity" (what a BS, lol) but on the global empire Americans are holding currently. Part of the imperial dynamics being, all the actually useful work, all the material production is getting outsourced abroad
Read 8 tweets
Sep 1
Reading Tess of the d'Urbervilles. Set in southwest England, somewhere in the late 1800s. And the first thing you need to know is that Tess is bilingual. He speaks a local dialect she learnt at home, and the standard English she picked at school from a London-trained teacher
So, basically, "normal" language doesn't come out of nowhere. Under the normal conditions, people on the ground speak all the incomprehensible patois, wildly different from each other

"Regular", "correct" English is the creation of state
So, basically, the state chooses a standard (usually, based on one of the dialects), cleanses it a bit, and then shoves down everyone's throats via the standardized education

Purely artificial construct, of a super mega state that really appeared only by the late 1800s
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(