There is questionable value of conversation with an individual who is either misinformed or intentionally misrepresenting recent history
However a thread to correct the record/explain apparent inconsistency in data that may lead others to honest error
1/n
March 2020 was a time of uncertainty & fear.
The evidence from Wuhan & northern Italy is that we would be engulfed by an unprecedented number of sick patients many needing ICU
Doing nothing was never an option
2/n
Early modelling suggested our 13 beaded DGH ICU would expect >500 ICU patients in a few weeks.
About 8 months work in one.
Three things reduced actual numbers
-voluntary public behaviour to reduce social interaction
-lockdown
-the predictions were likely too high
3/n
At this time the expectations were that all likely to benefit from care would be offered it
-hospital mortality was around 15-20%
-ICU mortality about 50%
Both serial fold higher then for ‘normal illnesses’
There were no known effective treatments
4/n
Hospitals were asked to immediately increase ICU ‘capacity’ 200-300%.
Healthcare does not run with a lot of ‘fat’ so expanding ICUs necessitates cutting or stopping something else.
What had to stop was routine surgery (& much of other routine care)
Based on surge 3 I estimate surgery reduced by up to 50%. Paediatric surgery up to 90%.
6/n
Fear & personal risk were huge issues
-epidemic outbreaks were typical on wards
-frontline hospital staff were 3-4-fold more likely to be infected (& those they lived with 2-fold) than their community
-risk disproportionately affected junior frontline staff
7/n
Protective equipment to counter increased infection risk was limited & the wrong design
Healthcare workers died: with risk restricted to frontline workers
Those who died were disproportionately
-from ethnic minorities
-first generation immigrants
8/n
The fear of infection was huge for ICU staff. In SARS & MERS ICU staff had high risks of infection & death.
It is no exaggeration that in surge 1 it was an act of bravery just to go to work (as I was acutely aware while working from home)
9/n
ICU personal protective equipment was unpleasant, restrictive & prevented communication
This hampered clinical care, communication & human level interaction with patients & colleagues
ICU was not comfortable for anyone
On wards PPE was inadequate
10/n
The number of ICU patients was only one factor
In addition
-each COVID patient stayed an average of 12-14 days on ICU. Many > 1 month.
So each COVID admission equivalent to ≈4 normal admissions
-no visiting was allowed.
A massive burden on patients, families & staff
11/n
Elsewhere respiratory, general & geriatric medical
wards were owerwhelmed by COVID
-huge numbers of cases
-high staff sickness rates
Most deaths were not in ICU
-1/10 of all COVID deaths and 1/7 in hospital were on ICU
12/n
In one ward where I work - normally a routine surgical ward where death is uncommon - there were more then 40 consecutive days when a patient or patients died.
None had visitors & dying support delivered entirely by ward staff
Not normal
Not comfortable
13/n
To minimise infection of patients in hospital (many at high risk of harm if infected) hospitals had to
-close up to 20% beds
-effectively run two segregated hospitals side by side
-change routine care fundamentally
Despite this many thousands were infected in hospitals
14/n
Respiratory wards undertook as particularly high workload
-delivering treatments that in many hospitals are restricted to ICU (effectively a further expansion of ICU services)
-triaging who should/would come to ICU if they deteriorated
15/n
Throughout all this prinary care took on an enormous workload including
-care of COVID patients & outbreaks in nursing homes
-triaging who should go to hospital (or not)
-delivering the care hospitals could not
All with minimal protection & resource
16/n
The question of triage is a highly controversial one
When demand exceeds capacity not all can have the care they need
Restricting access to hospital, treatment, ICU more than would be normal is population triage.
This can be explicit or hidden.
I believe this took place
17/n
The psychological impact of working in these conditions (primary care, ED, wards, ICU) all different but all hugely impactful
Witnessing
-deaths
-suffering
-all without family support
The burdens of PPE, personal risk, family risk, exhaustion, uncertainty
18/n
The surge of March/April 2020 was bedevilled by uncertainty, fear, poor PPE planning/execution, staff sickness & a sense of isolation
The surge of Dec/Han 2020/21 was notably more widespread & an even greater burden on healthcare
But that’s for another thread
19/n
My personal setting
I work in a DGH in region with lowest numbers in surge 1 (also region with fewest ICU beds per capita)
I was working from home in surge 1 & involved in professional national responses
Then back in work
I believe others suffered much worse than me
20/n
On one level denying that all this happened (& I’ve only scratched the surface) is dumb & offensive.
Equally importantly, we need to learn the lessons of what has happened in the last two years. If we don’t we are doomed to repeat the errors.
Denial doesn’t help.
21/21
For clarity in surge 1 some of the things UK ICUs ran out of included
-ICU beds
-ICU staff
-oxygen
-basic sedative drugs
-dialysis
-breathing machines (CPAP & ventilators)
All more so than PPE (though they too was a struggle)
A thread on the (topical) high rate of COVID identified or acquired in hospital
The fact that this is up to 30% is being highlighted by some as indicating that hospitalisation numbers are inaccurate
1/
First I agree that it leads to confusion & it would be much better to report -those admitted due to COVID
- those admitted ‘while infected’ (likely same as community rate ≈2-3% cases)
-those who acquire it in hospital
2/
Hospital patients are swabbed regularly after admissions & classified by when +ve
About 1000 patients in ICU with COVID through last several months
Equivalent to 1/3 of all UK ICU beds
So the rest of UK health is running on 2/3 of required ICU capacity
ICUs have expanded, taking staff from other locations
It's unsustainable
2/
ICU UNDER SUSTAINED PRESSURE
The numbers admitted to ICU with pneumonia (almost all COVID) dwarfs previous years
Viral pneumonia on ICU is normally a rarity.
Now it is our most common diagnosis
I don't follow all the inferences (especially that all staff cases on 'green wards' (ie those without known COVID patients) were community acquired) but I do agree with their finding that a change to FFPs dramatically reduced staff infections on 'red wards' (COVID wards)
2/9
I've argued for a long time for more FFP use on wards based on
- epidemiological evidence of xs infection on the wards vs ICU
- aerosol data showing patient status more important that procedures
- known better performance of FFPs vs surgical masks