Byron York Profile picture
Aug 31 11 tweets 3 min read
DOJ wins daily PR battle with photo of classified documents strewn across floor at Mar-a-Lago. Story is Trump alleged mis-handling of classified documents, and just look at them -- scattered all over the floor! Can you believe it? 1/11
Is that the way the documents were found? Many on Twitter believe so. Representative tweet: 'This is how Trump stored Top Secret material he stole.' 2/11
So question: Is that the way the documents were kept? The DOJ filing refers to Attachment F as 'redacted FBI photograph of certain documents and classified cover sheets recovered from a container in the '45 office.'' 3/11
The layout of the photo does not conform with other descriptions of how the documents were kept -- 'intermixed' and 'commingled' with magazines, photos, print-outs, letters, and other stuff. 4/11
Surely the FBI took photos of the documents as they were found in the container. But what about the photo that was released? How did that come to be taken? 5/11
Now, it's not unusual for law enforcement to release photos of evidence. 6/11
There is the classic shell-casing-on-street photo to show evidence as it was found. Then there are the guns-drugs-and-cash displays at HQ to show evidence recovered from, say, a drug raid. 7/11
But the Mar-a-Lago photo--what NYT calls a 'striking visual aid'--appears to be neither of those. It is not a photo of the classified documents as they were initially discovered by the FBI. Nor is it a display at a DOJ facility. 8/11
Did the FBI remove the documents from the container, spread them out on the floor at Mar-a-Lago, and take the photo? OK. But in selecting the photo to be made public -- wouldn't it have been more informative to see the documents as they were actually kept? 9/11
One Trump antagonist loved DOJ's decision to include photo in filing. 'Very smart. A picture is worth...' tweeted Andrew Weissmann, sometimes known as Mueller's 'pit bull.' 10/11
Of course some will say the styling of the photo doesn't matter. Law enforcement does it all the time! You're just trying to distract from the issue! But the photo is everywhere. Absolutely everywhere. It tells a story. 11/11 End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Byron York

Byron York Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ByronYork

Aug 26
Trump documents: What we still don't know. TOP SECRET/NOFORN? Well, the Nunes memo was TOP SECRET/NOFORN, and the only thing its publication damaged was the reputation of the FBI. 1/4 washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/trump-…
That is not to say the Mar-a-Lago documents, or some of them, might not have some serious national security content and implications. They might. 2/4
But in the end, remember: We do not know what is in the documents. But we do know Trump and his obsessions. 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Jul 10
More reporting that J6 committee, in videotaped, under oath interview, did *not* ask Pat Cipollone about statement Cassidy Hutchinson attributed to him, that they would be 'charged with every crime imaginable' if they let Trump go to Capitol on January 6. 1/4
It was a pretty simple situation. Hutchinson testified: He said X to me. Committee could have asked him: Did you say X to her? Instead, committee stayed away from question. 2/4
Why? NYT reports Cipollone does not recall saying that. J6 committee 'was made aware before the interview that Cipollone would not confirm that conversation were he to be asked.' So they did not ask. 3/4 nytimes.com/2022/07/09/us/…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 9
A simply stunning report about J6 committee. Cassidy Hutchinson testified she talked with Pat Cipollone on morning of January 6. White House counsel worried about Trump going to Capitol. Hutchinson said he told her to make sure it didn't happen... 1/6 npr.org/2022/06/28/110…
Hutchinson testified Cipollone said if Trump went to Capitol, 'We're going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen.' Then detailed some of the alleged crimes... 2/6
Hutchinson testimony viewed as very big deal, suggesting White House counsel feared big legal exposure stemming from J6. But get this... 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jul 1
When Liz Cheney got to the tune-in-for-the-next-exciting-episode portion of the recent J6 committee hearing, starring Cassidy Hutchinson, Cheney read two examples of what she suggested was witness tampering by TrumpWorld. 1/6
First, Cheney read 'how one witness described phone calls from people interested in that witness' testimony.' Then, Cheney quoted from a description of 'a call received by one of our witnesses,' in that witness' own words. 2/6
Cheney offered no details. No names, no timing, no context, no story, no nothing. Except that it was very, very concerning. And tune in for the next episode! 3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jun 14
Jaw-dropping that golfer Phil Mickelson was asked today to explain that he is not a 'partner' of Osama bin Laden and the 9/11 hijackers. Why in the world would he be bin Laden's 'partner'? Because he joined Saudi-funded LIV Golf. 1/5
Moral preening of sports journalists at Mickelson US Open newser today was off the scale. Would Mickelson write a letter to 9/11 families about his decision to join LIV Golf? 2/5
Has anyone noticed that President Biden is preparing to go to Saudi Arabia, where he will meet with MBS? That top Biden officials have already done so? That the administration is begging Saudis to pump more oil? 3/5
Read 5 tweets
May 12
If you're interested in Trump 2020 election challenge, you should read newly-released John Eastman emails. Shed light on Eastman's notion of overturning election results on basis of theories and estimates, not actual evidence. 1/4 politico.com/f/?id=00000180…
One Pennsylvania state lawmaker introduced Eastman as the man 'responsible for opening my eyes to our ability to exercise our plenary authority to decertify presidential electors (without ANY 'evidence' of retail 'voter fraud')... 2/4
Could anything have better summarized the Eastman-Trump scheme? Fortunately, no state enacted Eastman's idea. His famous memo was predicated on claim states had submitted 'dual slates of electors,' which they had not. 3/4
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(