Leon Wolf 🇮🇱 Profile picture
Aug 31, 2022 17 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Let's review what we know about Jessie Smollett -- errr, Rachel Richardson, her godmother Lesa Pamplin, and the things we already know were lies in the story Smollett — dangit, sorry, Richardson, and Pamplin told. 1/
1. The one person in this story we can say for certain has definitively repeatedly used racial slurs (against white people) is Pamplin, who (surprisingly!) protected her twitter account, but not until after people started pulling the receipts 2/tbdailynews.com/video-shows-th…
2. One of the central claims Pamplin originally made to buttress her claims was that the police were called and sat on the end of the Duke bench. She later amplified this claim to say that the taunts "got louder and louder when the police came to the bench." 3/
Let's put a pin in this one and come back to it later, because it's important. Here is video of the entire game. You will note that the claim specifically was that this happened in the second set. The Duke bench is repeatedly shown during and after. 4/
3. The patsy BYU threw under the bus to make this situation go away was innocent. That patsy was used by people to lend credibility to this story: "See! Even BYU found the guy and ejected him." The problem is that video shows he was not guilty 5/ sltrib.com/sports/2022/08…
4. A little more on this patsy. The way he became the patsy is that he was specifically identified by Smollett — I mean Richardson — as the guilty party. She likely picked him out because he did, in fact, have a conversation with her after the game. 6/
That conversation appears to have been completely harmless in nature as detailed in the Trib article above. But a review of the video shows that when he approached Smollett — dangit, Richardson, she does not act at all like he had been shouting the N-word at her all game. 7/
And of course, the most damning thing of all is that police reviewed the tape and determined that he WAS NOT EVEN IN HIS SEAT when the alleged racial slurs were being cast. 8/
5. Weirdly, after the police exonerated the patsy BYU threw under the bus, the athletic department at BYU didn't want the police to review any more footage to help them catch the person at the center of the story. For some reason. Look at this gem from the Trib: 9/ Image
6. No person, among the thousands in attendance, has heard the alleged slurs yelled at Smollett. No one, among the thousands of young people in attendance, has come forward with video of it happening. It is to laugh: 10/ Image
7. If your conspiracy theory is that the entirety of the student section is keeping quiet because they are all white supremacists covering for each other, it does not explain the several black members of the BYU basketball team saying nothing. 11/
They were sitting right next to the area of the student section where the slurs were allegedly coming from and were shown on video several times during the match. None reacted in any way like someone was yelling the N-word right next to them and none has reported hearing it. 12/
8. Coming back to that police officer, and the claim that the chants "got louder and louder" after he was called. In the first place, the police have... how do we say this politely... disputed the exact version of events being sold by Smollett. 13/ Image
9. Now here's where it starts to get really obvious that this story is a hoax. Beyond the absence of evidence that this occurred, it turns out that people WENT LOOKING FOR IT at the time it was alleged to have been happening — and, indeed, escalating. 14/ Image
10. Now here's where we're finally going to get to what probably actually happened, which I've underlined (poorly) for your benefit. 15/ Image
Unless you have Smollett-family-levels of gullibility, it is perfectly obvious at this point, based on this set of facts, that THIS is what happened at the game that upset Smollett-Richardson, and she decided this was not sensational enough, and changed it to racial slurs. 16/
Best of luck to BYU's athletic department, though, in what I am sure will be their exhaustive search to identify the guilty person. Oh hey, one final tidbit from the Trib article: 17/ Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Leon Wolf 🇮🇱

Leon Wolf 🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LeonHWolf

Apr 1, 2023
I see that Douglass Mackey has been convicted of election interference and is possibly headed to jail and I have some things to say. 1/
I did not pay much attention to this story until a few days ago. Because stories have used his real name, I didn’t realize who he was on Twitter. All I saw was the framing that he was being prosecuted for what was commonly described as a “meme,” which sounded ridiculous. 2/
Then I realized that the person under discussion was formerly known on Twitter as @Ricky_Vaughn99, who is one of the most despicable people who ever walked the earth. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 2, 2023
If there is one thing that I would hope this pandemic would have illustrated as a position that literally everyone could get behind, it is that we should not be monkeying around with viruses to make them more dangerous in order to make vaccines in case someday they exist. 1/
I don't mean that such research should be barred from government funding, I mean that it should be illegal. You don't have to believe that this is how COVID-19 started at all in order to grasp this obvious point. 2/
It has been conclusively demonstrated that diseases are more dangerous than nuclear weapons. It should also be obvious that diseases are much more prone to accidental discharge than nuclear weapons. Yet, imagine the security we give to nuclear weapons. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Apr 6, 2022
False. In fact, the entire reason we are here is because of journalistic dishonesty. The widespread malpractice in coverage of this bill is the real reason for this animus. 1/
First off, any journalist who refers to this bill as "Don't Say Gay," or who notes that others refer to it that way, without also noting that this description is objectively false, is too lazy or too dishonest to listen to. 2/
It's important to ask, "Then why did people come up with this label and apply it to the bill?" The answer is that its opponents did not want people to know that they are opposing what the bill actually does. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Dec 25, 2021
Saw so many people savaging this tweet yesterday that I thought, in the spirit of Christmas, that I would offer some reasons to encourage people to at least stop saying mean things about the person who posted it. 1/
She isn't evil, or crazy. She just suffers from the condition of being a hammer. To a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Some people are just incapable of seeing past their field of expertise and realizing that people have other considerations for how to live their lives 2/
Lawyers can have this same problem. The way they teach you to think in law school, when a client comes to you with a question, you can pretty much always think of a reason why what they want to do might expose them to liability. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Jul 23, 2021
Fauci is a bureaucrat. Nothing more, nothing less. He isn't Jesus Christ. Any other bureaucrat who is in charge of millions/billions in grant $, we would encourage aggressive questioning over whether they made mistakes and/or are covering their own asses or their friends'. 1/
When it's Fauci, though, aggressive questioning of his funding decisions is treated like an attack on science and truth itself. Just absolutely ridiculous. I realize that for a lot of people Fauci was an important voice last year but let's not lose perspective. 2/
No other bureaucrat possibly in the history of this country would have the media actually taking his side on the question of whether he is lying about funding gain of function research at this point, especially given that email. It's amazing to watch. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Mar 11, 2021
I would like to not care about Taylor Lorenz and her toadies. They won’t let me.
In a perfect world both Taylor and I could think and write whatever dumb thing we want and people could decide on their own who they want to read/subscribe to. In Taylor's, everyone who disagrees with her should be fired or kicked off platforms they need for their livelihood.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(