It's official: LNG-mania is running wild among Canada's conservative politicians and pundits. Why, they keep asking, are we missing out on such a glorious opportunity to sell hydrocarbons to Europe -- and why won't the PM support it more vocally.

Here's why. A thread.
First, the facts: Russia's invasion of Ukraine has sent European natural gas prices soaring. The UK, among other countries, is in for a very difficult winter. If we had LNG terminals on the US east coast, we'd be able to help.

But we'd need a Delorean for that.
Why? Because up until this year, the long-term market for LNG looked....not great. Here's the IEA's forecast from 2019. iea.org/data-and-stati… Image
That's the thing about the LNG business: you're making a long-term bet on the price of the commodity, one that you often can't lock in. And prices have gyrated *wildly* in recent years.

Oh, and there's that climate change thing lurking out there.
If you believe, as our oil sands companies apparently do, that we'll reach net-zero emissions by 2050, then there's almost no room for additional LNG projects.

Here's the IEA's forecast around that. See the quick peak and quick decline? That's not good for new projects. Image
Their report: “During the 2030s, global natural gas demand declines by more than 5% per year on average, meaning that some fields may be closed prematurely or shut in temporarily."

Declining demand = falling prices. Would you invest in a long-term project in that environment?
LNG proponents love to talk about how it will reduce emissions from coal. But here's the thing: renewables can (and will) do that too. Battery technology improvements are going to be a game changer. noahpinion.substack.com/p/decade-of-th…
But oil and gas enthusiasts refuse to see this. Here's Eric Nuttall, Canada's biggest oil and gas fund manager, in a recent piece for the @financialpost. Image
Building new projects right now makes very little business sense. The PM was right about that.

But what about the past, you say! Surely he's responsible for the absence of a bunch of projects.

Not quite.
Here's a summary of all the projects that have come before the NEB/CER. Sure seems like a lot of approvals to me.

cer-rec.gc.ca/en/application… Image
In fact, the only project they've blocked is LNG Saguenay -- one that the Government of Quebec came out and rejected first. If you believe in provincial autonomy and jurisdiction (Hello, Danielle Smith!) then surely their decision should be respected. Right?
One final complaint I hear often: look at all the LNG projects in the United States!

There's a pretty big difference between the US Gulf Coast (heavily industrialized, abutted by a major oil and gas producing state) and BC's north coast.
If Alberta was on the coast and California stood between the US natural gas deposits and its only source of tidewater, the situation would probably be reversed.

But geography abides.
So, should we be helping Germany and Europe? Absolutely. But unless someone has the ability to travel back in time a decade or so and convince everyone to support LNG terminals, there's no point in braying about the "missed opportunity".
Instead, let's focus on the one in front of us: the energy transition. Europe is already accelerating its plans there, by the way. So is the United States. So is China. And so on.

Let's not get left behind because some people want to live in the past.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Max Fawcett 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

Max Fawcett 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @maxfawcett

Jul 7
Either Pierre Poilievre doesn't actually know what's happening here or he's depending on his followers not bothering to fact-check him.

Allow me. 🧵 Image
First of all: no, Europe is not "exempting its businesses" from the industrial carbon tax. It's exempting small importers, who tend not to import things like steel, cement, and aluminum.

99% of said emissions will remain covered by the regulation. Image
Ironically, that's not even what the piece he links to is talking about.

Instead, it's referring to the change that will see *exporters* exempted from the carbon tax (or made whole on payments they've already made). Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 5
This is being spun like a good news story. It's actually much more complicated -- and interesting -- than that.

Let's dive in with a thread. 🧵
Oil production is up, while emissions are slightly down. Good news, right?

Sort of. Image
The heaviest lifting, by far, was done by the electricity sector. Why? Because the NDP government implemented a coal phaseout, one that ultimately beat its 2030 target by seven years. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 2
This is an interesting interview, and anyone interested in Alberta should listen to it if only to hear what the Alberta NDP is up against. Smith is a very skilled storyteller.

But that's just it: they're stories. I'll dig into one in particular.

Yup, it's thread-o-clock. 🧵
Herle asks her what would be different if Harper had won the 2015 election and been prime minister ever since. It's a good question, and one I've asked folks many times.

Her answer is representative of her politics: it sounds reasonable and yet the facts clearly contradict her.
“We would have built the Northern Gateway pipeline,"
she begins, "because it was already approved and permitted.”

Would we? I know @andrew_leach has all the receipts here about how Harper's government alligator-armed the project, but I want to share this tweet instead. Image
Read 14 tweets
May 22
The prospect for oil demand peaking within a few years isn't just an academic conversation. It's central to the conversation around an independent Alberta -- one the premier keeps stoking.

Let's do a thread. 🧵
The piece she's quoting is a huge mess. It conflates peak *supply* and peak *demand*, and spends most of its time talking about the former.

Nobody, to be clear, is actually worried about the former. Image
The author also claims that the International Energy Agency is "an intergovernmental organization on energy aimed at achieving global net-zero emissions."

Mmm, nope. Image
Read 12 tweets
Apr 28
As an Albertan -- and, like Licia, someone who was born and raised in different parts of the country -- I feel compelled to weigh in here.

A thread: 🧵
Andrew is right that Corbella is misrepresenting the facts on C-69 and Gateway. That's par for the course here.

Indeed, it's *central* to understanding the argument she's making. It depends on a wilful misrepresentation of the past, one designed to keep Albertans angry.
Her argument depends fundamentally on the notion that the emissions cap is, in fact, a *production* cap.

This is what the industry wants people to believe. Gee, I wonder why? Image
Read 9 tweets
Apr 22
I respect Christopher Ragan. But I don't agree with this column he wrote on western alienation. A thread: 🧵readtheline.ca/p/christopher-…
He starts by acknowledging the evils of the National Energy Program, and how it was "easy to see the damage done to the Alberta economy as the Liberal government of Pierre Trudeau intervened in the oil market to transfer massive sums of money to other parts of the country."
This is a pretty obvious example of spurious correlation, though. The NEP was renegotiated in 1981. Its provisions actually *favoured* the development of new sources like oil sands crude -- and promised to pay a *premium* for them.

And, of course, there was this: Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(