“A vast majority of Canadians want safe and secure digital IDs to confirm their identity to access government services online seamlessly, from any device, anywhere, anytime,” the Canada School of Public Service Event explains.
The claim is sourced from a survey on Canadians' views of digital ID published by the Digital ID and Authentication Council of Canada (DIACC) – an org partnering with the Public Sector Chief Information Officer Council. (PSCIOC)
Having never heard of them, I dug further...
In DIACC's letter of intent to work with PSCIOC, the group is referenced as a "governmental advisory/consultative" body that is comprised of "senior officials of the federal, provincial and territorial governments of Canada."
But wait, there's more...
The agreement also goes onto state "their intention to work together ... to develop one Pan Canadian Trust Framework considering public and private sector contexts."
Essentially a public-private national digital ID infrastructure...
In fact the the PSCIOC is one of many councils that compose the Insitute for Citizen-Centred Service (Citizen First) which was created by the Clerk of the Privy Council in 1997 under the name of the "Canadian Centre for Management Development.".
In short, the government is relying on surveys conducted by an org it is clearly collaborating with through an obscure advisory body to claim that a "majority of Canadians" support digital ID.
If and when a "Pan Canadian" digital ID is adopted across Canada it will be a major shift in how Canadians interact with services federally and privately.
If the Government of Canada wants to earn Canadians' trust, why aren't these ties more transparent?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, the early voices initially critical of Canada's dollar-for-dollar retaliation, like Shopify’s CEO @tobi and Rumble’s CEO @chrispavlovski are vindicated: retaliatory tariffs were a harebrained idea from the start.
@junonewscom @tobi @chrispavlovski When Carney stood at a podium in February 2025 and declared that Canada would hit back “dollar-for-dollar” against U.S. tariffs, many Canadians applauded. But just a few months later, the smoke has cleared — and political posturing has given way to economic reality.
@junonewscom @tobi @chrispavlovski Oxford Economics revealed on May 15 that the actual economic impact of Canada’s so-called retaliatory tariffs is “nearly zero” thanks to sweeping carve-outs quietly introduced during the federal election campaign.
Global Affairs Canada @CanadaFP is USAID on steroids
Listen to this diplomat giddily talk about how her mission is to spread "intersectional transformative feminism" in Lebanon.
Short thread on how Canada's foreign aid is a woke slush fund below 👇
In 2022 I obtained documents showing how Canada's foreign service had become obsessed with race, microagressions, "ambient bigotry" and forcing mandatory anti-racism training onto staff.
More on Lebanon... Priorities at Global Affairs Canada included spending over $3M to reach two "gender fluid" people in the Middle Eastern country for a survey.
Trudeau's likely successor says politicians who backtrack on climate must be held accountable.
Discover @TrueNorthCentre's new series exposing the agenda behind Carney's "Values" — Part 1: Carbon taxes
👇 tnc.news/2025/02/04/mar…
Mark Carney once tried to convince the world to adopt carbon taxes. Today, he’s all but abandoned a significant pillar of carbon pricing in his bid to become the next leader of the Liberal Party of Canada.
The man who once penned that “backtracking on ambitious climate agendas is more difficult if politicians share the same goals and expect to be held accountable” is, rather incredibly, backtracking on carbon taxes himself.
Dark day for Canada. Ontario’s privacy czar just ruled "anti-hate" researcher Barbara Perry can keep her gov-funded 300 "far-right groups" list secret.
Trudeau now has a carte blanche to craft laws using shady blacklists concocted by activist profs.
For over two years, I've been battling @ontariotech_u at the adjudication level to publicly release Perry's list and methodology.
The 2018 list was in part funded by almost $400,000 from Public Safety Canada.
Perry’s work, hyped in the media and by politicians, has been cited in Parliament in the process of crafting legislation. But despite promising transparency, she's failed to disclose ANY of these so-called “far-right” groups.