If allowing a special master is such a "modest step," why is Team Trump insisting the Master review every page of the seized materials--and let Trump's lawyers go through each page themselves for A/C privilege, exec privilege, and "highly personal" info? Not so modest, me thinks.
And why, if someone on Team Trump boxed up the stuff and knows what is supposed to be where, why do they need a Special Master in order to move for the return of stuff that is supposedly his alone?
Clue: They don't. It has never been about the return of property. It's always been about the twin pillars of any Trump litigation: delay and disparagement.
Here, the attacks on DOJ as partisan hacks continue--and now have been extended to ODNI, which Trump's team says "expeditiously 'facilitated'" a review of the classified materials found *after* they asked for a special master.
The chutzpah in accusing the intel community of shilling for DOJ after your client takes and keeps than 300 unique classified documents in places like his desk drawers is breathtaking, even for Team Trump.
p.s. Local rules in S.D. Florida limits reply briefs to 10 pages absent permission of the court. You think they had permission for their 18-page rant? Nope, no they did not. The rules don't apply. Wonder where they learned that.
Friends, my fave law prof used to say, “Read the rule. Read the rule. And read the rule again.” This is SDFL Local Rule 7.1(c):
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump's team says they need a special master so they can find the evidence they need to move for the return of his personal property. As convoluted and backwards as that is, what's worse is why they really want a special master, something made clearer today. 1/THREAD
As @MarcACaputo reported, they not only want the special master to review every page the FBI seized, but they also want the special master to give *them* access to all of it too, including an unredacted search warrant affidavit. 2/
@MarcACaputo To give a prospective defendant a peek at each and every page seized lawfully by the FBI plus the underlying search warrant affidavit -- which contains grand jury information and evidence obtained from *multiple* witnesses -- is bonkers. 3/
When DOJ sent Trump a subpoena on May 11, it asked for all documents in his custody or control, or that of his office, bearing classification markings. But the certification his team gave back to DOJ on 6/3 is worded differently. 1/
And specifically, it appears to be more narrow: It certifies that "a diligent search was conducted of the boxes that were moved from the White House to Florida," not that a diligent search was conducted of any and all locations where docs from his presidency might be stored. 2/
Read literally, that suggests to me that the search was purposefully limited--and that classified docs found during the M-A-L search *could* have been taken there well before Trump sent dozens of boxes there on leaving the White House in Jan. 21. Do others read it the same way?
NEW: Nearly a year after his *original* sentencing date, Matt Gaetz's wingman, Joel Greenberg, is ready to be sentenced. But he'll file his motion for a sentencing date under seal with court approval. 1/
Why? Because his motion would reveal the nature and extent of his cooperation in "active investigations" in multiple jurisdictions, he writes. 2/
And make no mistake: Greenberg's filing today indicates that he has cooperated in "ongoing . . . prosecutions," not just investigations, and that the investigations and prosecutions in which he has cooperated concern "multiple individuals." 3/