There's thousands of videos like this online - some esoteric, defensive martial artist being absolutely pummeled by a fit, offensive kickboxer.
And there are hundreds of studios in the US alone dedicated to teaching these reactive, complex arts.
All this snake oil - why?
In the 70s, Eastern martial arts had an explosion of popularity in the US, mostly due to Hollywood movies starring Bruce Lee. Later, we had The Karate Kid.
They introduced Americans to the exotic and flashy world of Kung Fu and Karate.
Dojos popped up in every major city.
Karate became a fixture in the Western imagination. With it, a 135 lb. Bruce Lee-type could kick a strongman across a room.
A teenager could block a flurry of punches from a trained assassin, dropping him with a well-placed chop.
Despite this fanciful image, 70s karate training was still very combative. Full-contact was the norm, and "sparring gear" was yet to enter the equation.
Kids and adults were fighting bare-knuckle, without foam-dipped helmets or gloves.
Kyokushin was a global sporting event.
Training was still very physical-fitness oriented. Karate training was something that could legitimately make someone more dangerous.
Many studios functioned like gangs, and dojoyaburi was still practiced.
But all of this changed as the consumer market got bigger.
Sometime in the 80s, the fantasy of karate and kung fu overtook reality. Instructors wanted to "make it big", and lowered standards to appeal to the masses.
They sold a fantastical version of karate, in which *anyone* could learn a few techniques and win a fight by skill alone.
Techniques which were once expert level - advanced parries, joint manipulation, fancy kicks - became standard.
But these just don't work without a baseline of physical fitness, aggression, and a strong grounding in basic offensive fighting.
This notion of *offensive fighting* is the key element.
The lowering of fitness standards shouldn't be overlooked, but the biggest change was from offensive to defensive fighting.
This is where American culture intersected to create snake oil.
1. Mass-market consumerism required making things "softer" and more palatable - no aggression, just reaction.
2. Litigiousness & aversion to violence required that instructors emphasize ***self-defense only***
Of course, anyone who's been in a fight knows that whoever throws the first punch wins 90% of the time. Aggression is *mandatory*.
But weak "martial artists" and money-hungry instructors rejected this. They created a cargo cult of actual fighting, based on defensive techniques.
The "generational cycle" of martial arts is very short - maybe 10 years.
So, four generations after this shift, almost everyone involved in Karate or Kung Fu learned from this idiotic school of thought.
Of course, these notions are disproved by actual fighting.
So, the competition rules were changed. More protective equipment, less contact, fewer takedowns.
Some arts literally stopped sparring.
Think of the WKF - those fights are absolute jokes, compared to something like the UFC.
But these organizations don't care. They ignore the elephant in the room and collect their snake oil paychecks from gullible students.
Then they give 9-year-olds black belts.
Today, it is controversial in the karate community to teach offensive fighting. To teach aggression. To teach the practiced application of violence.
But is that not the core ethos of martial arts?
Every historical martial art was once intended for extreme, life-or-death violence. If they were unsuccessful, they didn't survive.
It's ultra-recent perversions that neutered them, producing fat neckbeards that think they're dangerous.
Karate, aikido, kung fu, and more have been infected by this virus.
And so, they just keep producing fighters further and further divorced from the reality of combat.
The same thing has been happening in BJJ for years, even though there are holdouts.
Muay Thai is next.
I look forward to a revival of martial arts, with a focus on the martial element.
The UFC has done wonders for this, but most places teaching "fighting" are still soy beyond comprehension.
But I hope that people can once again recognize the original purpose of martial arts, and revive their warrior ethos.
Don't let Safetyism and consumerism continue to destroy martial arts.
Dojos must become exclusive. Physically rigorous. Aggressive. Violent.
This is the way.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The “work” debate is mostly people talking past each other, but it’s very clear that old-type “bootstrap” discourse is just done. Sandblasted into nothing each time it encounters reality. The “deal” for young people only gets worse with each passing day.
Doesn’t mean you should just become a NEET, obviously. But I don’t think most of the people arguing on that side are NEETs, or want to be NEETs. It’s just the premise.
The solution for young people is to exploit any advantage they personally have; to seek marginal living/employment situations that break the “rules” in their favor.
Also high-powered careers — “normal life” is broken, so you have to aspire to something else while it’s repaired.
The passive nature of so many young people is the result of a lifetime of this. Every event has been used as a way to further harangue and limit them. Responding to ie violence is out of the question. If you do, the typically helpless authorities suddenly have infinite power.
Kids aren’t dumb — they know who is protected vs who isn’t. It becomes obvious as early as grade school that some groups have free rein and others do not; the incentive/punishment system exists for normal whites and not for others.
Tyler has a Permanent Record. Tyrone does not.
The school system is an earlier and more radical extension of the legal-cultural system by which anarcho-tyranny is implemented, and tells especially young men of ability and spirit that they must Sit And Take It, no matter what It is.
US public schools consistently underpunish nonwhite students and overpunish white students. It’s where people learn the rules of anarcho-tyranny, and has been far longer than this has been the legal status quo.
This isn’t spread via policy or law. Disparate impact suits are usually brought up in this discussion, but all they did was codify the existing state of affairs.
It happens because “educators” — most people, really — are totally mindcaptured by media.
The results: white kids learn that everything they do will be scrutinized to the highest degree. Even outside of school, they are always Watched in some meaningful way. The Permanent Record exists for them and no one else. Racial violence, for example, can only ever go one way.
The main point of this post is pertinent and good — and of course it’s insane that we have to live like this — but I am begging people to drop the “bullying” frame, really the entire word.
What’s happening is not 80s movie shenanigans, it’s racial gang violence.
In the US, the equivalent is white parents talking about “bullying” from black students, which is really not the case. The cultural image of “bullying” is exclusion, mean names, minor/funny harassment. What’s happening is often attempted murder.
By complaining of “bullying” you’re saying that your child is archetypally the weak outsider, mocked by the “popular.” I don’t think this ever reflected reality (some have pointed out that they’re Semitic mythological tropes inserted via Hollywood) — and it certainly doesn’t now.
How people “learned” to fight is a contentious question. In many cases, it’s very tied into ethnic pride. Here’s a rough sketch of my hypothesis.
In short, I think the better question is when people *forgot* how to fight.
1/
There are many competing claims to being the “originator” of martial arts.
We’re going to define the term as systematized methods of fighting, whether unarmed or with weapons, but particularly hand-to-hand — i.e. archery or atlatl throwing is not a “martial art.”
Martial arts are also a distinctly… well, martial endeavor. They are undertaken exclusively among men, for the purpose of more effectively killing a resisting opponent in battle or single combat.
This includes combat with weapons, open-hand striking, and of course grappling.
This is ripped from David Foster Wallace’s “This is Water.” I know this because a middle school teacher made us watch it on repeat and do (many) assignments on it. Even as a kid, I found it juvenile and stupid. 150 years ago, students at that age would have been reading Latin.
When people brag about their “success” in K-12, it betrays a lack of depth. Basically, that they were good at repeating these kinds of platitudes, and getting pats on the head about it felt like a great achievement.
American public education isn’t really “hard,” in that the material is high-level and fast. A lot of it is embarrassingly flat — mediocre teachers doing Dead Poets Society or Stand and Deliver LARP. Anyone smart realizes this young.