Eddie Fishman Profile picture
Sep 2 22 tweets 4 min read
Today, the G7 formally endorsed a price cap on Russian oil sales. This plan has been in the works for months. Many doubted it would get across the finish line.

Bottom line: This is a big deal. It will erode the Kremlin's most critical source of revenue: oil exports (🧵):
(1) First things first: Oil is the lifeblood of Russia's economy. In recent years, oil has accounted for 30-40% of the Kremlin budget. But sanctions have caused a 15% decline in Russia's non-oil revenues. The result is that oil is playing an increasingly essential role for Putin.
(2) To date, Western sanctions have not made a dent in Russia's oil revenues. While the US and several allies placed an embargo on Russian oil months ago, Russia has increased sales to China, India, and other countries, keeping the overall volume of its sales roughly constant.
(3) Russia has already been selling oil at a steep discount—>$20 lower than Brent prices. Yet global oil prices have been so high this year that the Kremlin's total oil revenues have remained substantial. Russia has earned ~$20 billion selling oil each month this year.
(4) These oil profits have cushioned the Russian economy amid a torrent of sanctions (though sanctions are still biting—Russia's economy is poised for a contraction of >5% this year). If you're looking for a reason Russia's economy hasn't yet collapsed, look no further than oil.
(5) We saw a similar phenomenon with Iran sanctions before 2012. From 2006-12, sanctions effectively froze Iran out of the global financial system. But the economy continued to grow. Iran's economy didn't fall off a cliff until the US rolled out global oil sanctions in 2012.
(6) Revenue = volume x price. The Iran oil sanctions focused on cutting volumes of Iran's oil sales. There was a debate at the time about whether to push for volume or price reductions; volume won because of ease of implementation and monitoring (counting ships isn't so hard).
(7) By contrast, the G7 Russia oil sanctions will focus on price. Iran exported about 2.5m bpd of crude oil at the beginning of 2012. Russia today exports 7.5m bpd of crude oil + refined products. Big cuts into Russia's volumes would squeeze global supply and push prices upward.
(8) How will the G7 price cap work? For starters, there will actually be two price caps: one for crude oil, another for refined products. Implementation day for crude oil will be December 5 of this year, when the EU maritime insurance ban is set to begin and US GL-8C expires.
(9) Details will be hammered out in the coming months. But we do know that the G7 will prohibit the provision of all services (payments, insurance, financial services, brokering, bunkering, piloting, etc) for shipments of Russian oil that exceed the price cap.
(10) Firms that provide these services will need to submit an attestation that the underlying oil cargo complies with the price cap. If the US or EU catches any company misrepresenting the price or submitting a fraudulent attestation, they can impose sanctions on that company.
(11) This threat of sanctions is the "stick." But the success of this policy will hinge even more on the "carrot"—the opportunities for China, India, and others to buy Russian oil at even larger discounts than they do today.
(12) Will China or India endorse the policy? No way. But will they comply with it? I suspect that, by and large, Russian and Indian companies will comply. Non-compliance would involve taking on big risks and paying more for unproven insurance, shipping, and other services.
(13) In other words, compliance by China and India would be an act of charity to Putin. It would be harmful to Chinese and Indian interests. That's why my instinct is that compliance may not be perfect, but it will largely work as intended: cutting the price of Russian oil.
(14) Will Russia comply? The Kremlin has already threatened not to sell oil to anyone that complies with the price cap. But the costs to Russia of turning off the taps would be grim. Moscow cannot afford to go without oil revenues—even for a short time.
(15) While we don't yet know what the initial price cap will be—or what the process will entail for selecting it—we do know that it will be set above Russia's marginal cost of production. So Russia will have strong economic incentives to continue to sell oil.
(16) The likeliest outcome is that the policy works, even as Beijing claims that it is not complying and Moscow swears that it won't sell to anyone that does comply. All the while, sanctions on investment in Russia's energy sector will further erode Russia's production capacity.
(17) Could it fail? Of course. This is a first-of-its-kind policy. But in many ways, it requires less of a mental leap than the Iran oil sanctions of 2012—which cut Iran's volumes by more than 60% and locked up all of its oil revenues in restricted accounts outside of Iran.
(18) The Biden administration deserves credit for doggedly pushing this policy and persisting against major headwinds. (I first wrote about it almost 4 months ago.) And the other members of the G7 deserve credit for being willing to take the risk. foreignaffairs.com/articles/russi…
(19) The 2012 Iran oil sanctions were ultimately unilateral—they originated in US Congressional legislation (NDAA FY2012), and we had to threaten secondary sanctions to implement them. Yes, US allies played ball and complied with the policy. But they were not co-authors of it.
(20) The Russia oil price cap of 2022, on the other hand, is backed by the full weight of the G7. That alone is an impressive feat. /end
Minor correction to (8) above: There will actually be *three* price caps: one for crude oil, one for high-value refined products, and one for low-value refined products. The refined product caps will debut on February 5, 2023.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eddie Fishman

Eddie Fishman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @edwardfishman

May 2
As the EU weighs sanctions against Russia's oil sales, a question looms: What to do about non-EU buyers of Russian oil?

If China and India ramp up purchases of Russian oil, it could negate the impact of EU sanctions. Thankfully, the West can do something about it (🧵):
(1) The West can require all payments for Russian oil—whether from China, India, or elsewhere—to accrue in escrow accounts outside of Russia. To enforce this requirement, the West will need to use both positive and negative incentives.
(2) On the positive side, the West can allow the funds to be used for non-sanctioned trade. For instance, China's payments for Russian oil would accrue in bank accounts in China. Russia would be able to use those funds to buy non-sanctioned goods from China.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 6
The US just announced a new raft of sanctions on Russia.

Bottom line: This is the biggest new round of sanctions since the Central Bank of Russia action more than a month ago. But there are still gaps that need to be closed. Quick analysis (🧵): whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
(1) The US imposed full-blocking sanctions on Sberbank, by far Russia's largest bank, as well as Alfa Bank, the largest private bank in Russia. Energy transactions are still carved out. But Russia's banking sector is increasingly cut off from the global financial system.
(2) The US prohibited all new investment in Russia. While most US companies have already left Russia, this ban will ensure they stay out and can't rush back in as soon as they think there's money to be made. It will also coax any laggards to leave the Russian market now.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 5
As Russia's brutal atrocities in Ukraine come to light, gaps in sanctions that allow ongoing business with Russia are becoming hard to justify.

@crmiller1 and I argue in @ForeignAffairs that the West should maximize sanctions now. A few key points (🧵): foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukrai…
(1) The sanctions that are currently in place will push Russia into a deep recession this year. But Russia continues to rake in about $1 billion every day selling energy. As a result, Russia's financial position remains strong and its current account is still in surplus.
(2) Energy sales have sustained Putin’s war effort. Because of sanctions, Russia cannot easily borrow from abroad, so any goods it imports must be matched by funds earned from exports. Thanks to European energy payments, the Kremlin hasn’t had to try hard to balance its accounts.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 29
Sanctions against Russia have been unprecedented in speed, the scale of targets, and international cooperation.

But they are NOT comprehensive. They remain a 7/10 or 8/10 in intensity, not a 10/10.

A few myths that require correcting (🧵):
(1) Not all Russian banks have been cut off from SWIFT. In fact, the EU has cut off just 7 Russian banks from SWIFT. Of the 5 largest Russian banks, just one (VTB) is banned from SWIFT. Sberbank, which is by far Russia's largest bank, retains access to SWIFT. Image
(2) No, "self-sanctioning" has not devastated Russia's oil sales. Russian oil is still finding buyers. To truly curb Russia's oil sales, Europe will need to reduce its own imports, and the US & EU will need to launch a global secondary sanctions campaign.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 23
As the US & EU discuss cracking down on sanctions evasion, I'm hearing more and more chatter about "secondary sanctions."

What are secondary sanctions? How might they be applied to Russia?

A semi-technical explainer 🧵:
(1) First, we must understand "primary sanctions"—the plain vanilla sanctions the US has used thus far. Primary sanctions ban US firms from transacting with listed Russian entities—e.g. VTB is under primary sanctions, so no US firm can deal with VTB and its US assets are frozen.
(2) US-based firms (and others under US jurisdiction, including the leading global financial institutions) comply with primary sanctions because failure to do so is illegal. The consequences can be severe. In 2014, the US fined BNP Paribas $9 billion for violating Iran sanctions.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 18
The Russian government made $117 million in bond coupon payments, averting a sovereign default.

How was this possible? Does this mean sanctions aren't working? A short 🧵:
reuters.com/world/europe/r…
(1) How was this possible? Simple answer: Because the US Treasury is explicitly allowing these payments through May 25, per General License 9A (home.treasury.gov/system/files/1…). So the USG has determined that, for now, it's in our policy interest to allow Russia to service foreign debts.
(2) What is the policy rationale for allowing Russia to service its debt? Simple answer again: These are outflows of cash from the Russian government. With each coupon payment, the Russian sovereign has less cash on hand. Note that raising new debt is strictly prohibited.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(