Here is a quick summary of the “consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy” argument that we hear abortion advocates repeat ad nauseam:
First off, they aren’t bright, they’re confusing CONSENT with ASSENT.
Secondly, consent is a two-party transaction. If one party is not capable of giving or receiving consent, you don’t get to do whatever you want to them anyway.
An equivalent scenario to drive this point home would be if Brock Turner, remember him? If he told the judge “well she didn’t say no.”
This is not excuse or a license to infringe on the bodily autonomy of another living human.
If bodily autonomy is a basic human right, then it must logically apply to ALL living humans. Otherwise you are a MASSIVE hypocrite who only wants to dehumanize certain people so you can feel ok about harming or killing them. And we’ve seen that happen throughout history.
In the year of 2022, the means to prevent an unwanted pregnancy are many. And they’re simple. Over 99% effective.
You all know how babies are made, so let’s stop pretending to be stupid about what a woman is pregnant with, bc it won’t fly with me anymore. You’re not that dumb.
For a more comprehensive explanation of this, please read my dear friend’s article about it.
Stefanie is lying in this thread. Research by Guttmacher has proven that late term abortions are most commonly performed on healthy women with healthy babies.
First, the top-line finding is clear: “[D]ata suggest that most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment.”
"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samuel Adams, Ratifying Convention, 1788
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason
Essentially, the Dickey amendment states that any research the CDC does on this issue has to remain objective. I’m not sure why this bothers people like @Bright19Rainbow 🤷🏻♀️