Thread by @tosh254_tosh

ISSUE 1: INTEGRITY STANDARDS WERE MET BY IEBC
#SupremeCourtruling

ISSUE 2: THERE WAS NO STAGING AND DUMPING OF F34A’S AS ALLEGED BY THE PETITIONERS
NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE
#SupremeCourtruling

ISSUE 3: NO FORM OF MANIPULATION OF F34A’S IN THE PUBLIC PORTAL THROUGH PRESENCE IF A “MIDDLEMAN”
NO SIGNIFICANT NUMERICAL DIFFERENCES IN THE REGISTRAR’S SCRUTINY
#SupremeCourtruling

ISSUE 4: IEBC HAD THE REQUISITE JURISDICTION TO POSTPONE ELECTIONS IN KK & MOMBASA. THE AFORESAID POSTPONEMENT DIDN’T RESULT TO VOTER SUPPRESSION.
#SupremeCourtruling

ISSUE 5: THERE WAS NI UNEXPLAINABLE VARIANCE BETWEEN PRESIDENTIAL & OTHER ELECTIVE POSTS.STRAY BALLOTS CAN’T LEAD TO THE NULLIFICATION OF AN ELECTION.
#SupremeCourtruling

ISSUE 6: EXCLUSIVE PRESERVE OF THE IEBC CHAIR TO DECLARE PRESIDENT ELECT(Article 138[10]). OPAQUE 4 WERE PART OF TALLYING & VERIFICATION TILL THE 11TH HOUR.COMMISSION’S DUTY TO TALLY & VERIFY (ART 138/3C) AND NOT THE CHAIR.
#SupremeCourtruling

ISSUE 7: SCOK REITERATES THAT REJECTED VOTES CAN’T BE INCLUDED TO GET THE FINAL TALLY.SELECTIVE CROPPING OF A VIDEO CLIP ON VOTER TURNOUT BY THE PETITIONERS ON 65.4% WAS NEGATED BY IEBC THROUGH A CLIP AND THEREFORE CORRECT.ROUNDING OFF BY IEBC WAS CORRECT.
#SupremeCourtruling

ISSUE 8: THE MAGNITUDE OF IRREGULARITIES NOTED WERE NOT GREAT AS SUCH SO AS TO NULLIFY WILLIAM RUTO’S WIN.
#SupremeCourtruling

ISSUE 9: SCOK HAS NO JURISDICTION TO DECLARE A PRESIDENT ELECT AS PER SEC 80 OF THE ELECTIONS ACT AS PER THIS PETITION. CAN ONLY NULLIFY OR UPHOLD AN ELECTION.
ON THIS PETITION, IT IS UPHELD THAT WSR IS THE 5TH.
#SupremeCourtruling

A UNANIMOUS DECISION!

@threadreaderapp unroll