On this #LaborDay2022 I have provided some graphs and images on labor history and labor unions.
If you're teaching modern U.S. history and cover the Gilded Age, and want evidence of a "new Gilded Age," you may also find these useful. Enjoy!
As you might expect, union membership differs among states and regions in the U.S., and also private versus public sectors.
Relative social mobility, comparing different countries, from 2017
It's impossible to talk about labor unions in the U.S. without discussing the immense power and influence of corporations, the Constitution, our anti-union (and illegitimate?) Supreme Court, dark money lobbying, and tax rates.
This is from Jonathan Levy's Ages of American Capitalism. As labor's share of income decreases, corporate profits increase.
Members of the House of Representatives are more responsive to the needs of the working class and poor in districts that have high union membership.
Very alarming stats on the pay of CEOs and how much wealth the 1% own. Thanks to @Claudia_Sahm for the graph in orange.
Don't forget that the 2017 Trump* tax cuts were outlandishly and immorally generous toward the very rich.
Remember these trends the next time someone says they don't like paying taxes or believes in tax cuts. EVERY GOP tax cut since the 1980s has delivered most of the gains to the very rich.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Someone recently asked, Dead or Allmans? A brief thread that is somewhat akin to who's your favorite sports team, so it can get emotionally charged, especially with Deadheads, but in the end, let's not take this too seriously.
I like both bands but I'll vouch for the Dead...
This is a Wall of Sound show in England, Sept '74. So right before the classic show in Dijon, France and of course, before Winterland '74 that became part of the Grateful Dead movie and the Steal Your Face album.
The Wall of Sound was the HUGE, state-of-the-art sound system the Dead carried around to each venue, impressive even by today's standards, but finicky and costly to erect and dismantle. See an article here.
A lot of dissertations and books I come across in the field of history seem to favor breadth over depth. It seems so ubiquitous that it could easily pass without comment. Here's what I mean. I will come across something and look at the citations...
I see A LOT of secondary sources cited, which does take time and a certain amount of expertise and thinking to synthesize, but often feel unimpressed by the amount of primary sources cited. And since I've seen a lot of older works whose orientation is the opposite, I wonder...
how and why it became this way in academic history?
Your typical topic in academic history seems to take a group, commodity, or larger trend, and discuss it over a 50-year period, let's say. This contrasts with an in-depth study of a figure, election, or battle, for example.
Historians ask questions and construct narratives and arguments based on the responses to those questions. Let's ask a few.
1. In 2003, what percentage of the world's oil did Iraq contain?
2. In 2003, how many metric tons of GHG did Americans emit compared to rest of world?
3. Do you think the answer to question #2 has any relationship to the answer to question #1. If so, what is it?
Once you're aware of that relationship, how do you now think reasons for the United States's invasion of Iraq in 2003, as publicly stated by the Bush administration?
Let's return to Question #2. Of the total amount of GHG emitted by Americans in 2003, what percentage comes from transportation?
In general, do Americans have larger cars compared to Europeans? What is our public transportation like? Do we tax and subsidize fossil fuels in...
I gotta be 100% honest, I get annoyed when I'm challenged on climate. It's not that I think I'm above being challenged. It's that I think I've read a lot of the evidence, the evidence to me is very clear, and I can't understand why others don't feel the urgency I do.
I do understand why people get apathetic or don't want to rock the boat but at the end of the day I don't find these arguments convincing. And it takes a long time to lay out all of the evidence. I'd really like to write a book some time on the history of climate change, and...
oil industry propaganda, but I think those arguing with me on climate ought to do that. I'm busy with 500 students per year at 2 institutions, along with my own publishing goals. Read Oreskes & Conway, the Drilled Podcast and literally hundreds of other pieces of evidence.
1/68. THREAD on the International Gold Standard (GS), Inflation, Finance, and International Trade.
Intended for non-experts. Relevant for our own time! Includes Graphs, links, and images!
2/68. Note: I have not published peer reviewed articles or books on this topic, so I won’t claim to be an expert. Still, I had to learn enough of the basics to write about the Bank War and want to share my enthusiasm and understanding with others.
3/68. To start off, we can define the international gold standard as a monetary system used by most of the world’s major economies that prevailed from roughly 1870 to 1914.
1. THREAD. My thoughts on Jonathan Levy’s Ages of American Capitalism, with links and images!
2. I’m teaching Levy’s most recent book for one of my courses this semester. I was eager to read Chapter 4, “Capitalism and Democracy,” as it covers topics that are exciting and familiar to me.
3. It was because of my passion for this subject that upon reading a few of Levy’s claims, I embarked on a short, in-house journey of investigation and fact-checking. I am fortunate to possess many of the books that Levy draws upon, which allow me to track down original sources.