Share this page!

The Secret Barrister Profile picture
Twitter logo
Sep 6 • 5 tweets • 4 min read
In today’s episode of “Things I Didn’t Expect To Say When I Started Tweeting As An Anonymous Lawsplaining Rabbit”, may I place on record my thanks to Leonardo Di Caprio’s new alleged love interest for what I think we can all agree is her exquisite taste in literature.

#FakeLaw
Not *just* a law book, MailOnline. A Sunday Times bestselling law book exploring the popular myths we are fed about our justice system by those in power, from the author of fellow bestsellers “Stories of the Law and How it’s Broken” and “Nothing But The Truth”. Oh yes.

#FakeLaw
Anyway, if you want to get in on the act and read the literature of the Hollywood elite, #FakeLaw is available from all these lovely places.
I would also be remiss if I did not take the opportunity to plug #NothingButTheTruth, which, dare I say, looks even better when papped. Just ask this broad.
Apparently my new bezzie Maria has also been doing the business on Insta.

❤️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with The Secret Barrister

The Secret Barrister Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BarristerSecret

The Secret Barrister Profile picture
Aug 23
Evidence, if it were needed, of how little @jcartlidgemp understood the basics of his brief as justice minister.

His brilliant plan would

(A) Cost far more than it costs to pay independent barristers

(B) Instantly create a national shortage of barristers available to prosecute
Because here’s the thing that people like @jcartlidgemp fail to grasp.

Criminal barristers don’t just defend.

We don’t just prosecute.

Our independence means that we do both. We have the experience of both, which makes us better at both.

He wants to abolish this.

Insanity.
What @jcartlidgemp has done is read the stories like this, of a growing shortage of specialist criminal barristers available to prosecute serious crime, and think to himself:

“The solution is to ban barristers from prosecuting”.

The stupidity is off the scale.
Read 6 tweets
The Secret Barrister Profile picture
Aug 22
The truth:

@DominicRaab has defunded criminal justice, causing a record #RaabBacklog in the courts.

He ignored the independent legal aid report he promised to implement.

He has refused to even speak to the @TheCriminalBar.

He is sacrificing victims on the altar of his vanity.
Barristers on strike: a history

2008-2018 Barrister income cut by 28%

2018 - govt promises independent review into fees

2019-2021 - tumbleweed

2021 - independent review published. @DominicRaab sits on it.

2022 - Raab refuses to implement report’s “urgent” recommendations.
A Justice Secretary fit for office would not lie about the problems in criminal justice.

He would not offer up a broken justice system for further cuts.

He would not abuse those who keep the system running.

He would not undermine and threaten.

He would not ignore victims.
Read 4 tweets
The Secret Barrister Profile picture
Aug 16
Given that @lucyfrazermp has taken the time to write about the criminal justice system, in her capacity as a barrister, it is only fair to take some time to explain why almost every line of this article is untrue, nonsensical or both.

[THREAD]
Let’s start with where Ms Frazer is correct, because this will be quick.

She is spot on that there are outrageous, unacceptable delays in the criminal justice system for victims of crime, particularly cases involving allegations of sexual offending.

Damn right. It’s a scandal.
But why do we have years of delays? Well here are a list of factors identified in independent reports that @lucyfrazermp *doesn’t* mention:

🔴21k police officers cut
🔴Crown Prosecution Service staff cuts
🔴Courts closed & sold off
🔴Court budgets cut
🔴Not enough barristers
Read 15 tweets
The Secret Barrister Profile picture
Jun 22
I agree that “courts must have regard to the interests of all those concerned in criminal trials [and] of the public”.

That includes the interests of the public in there being a viable independent criminal Bar.

Something which, with respect, seems to have been missed here.
The interests of “all concerned” includes the interests of junior barristers unable to make a living, terrified of what the future holds and bravely taking the only steps open to them in the face of an government that is wilfully destroying criminal justice.

Again, forgotten.
We have a government that has run up a record court backlog due to cuts and mismanagement; which has built years of delay into criminal justice; which has forced 25% of criminal barristers out of the profession, meaning there simply aren’t enough of us. And which doesn’t care.
Read 7 tweets
The Secret Barrister Profile picture
Jun 21
Conservative councillor @SBarrettBar (who likes to claim he is “non-political”) has filled the airwaves with more inaccurate government propaganda this morning.

Criminal barristers have *not* been offered a “15% pay rise”.

He also does not seem to understand the cab rank rule.
If Steven had done his research before anointing himself an expert on criminal legal aid, he would know that legal aid fees have fallen so low that our regulator says that they do not represent “a proper professional fee”, and we are entitled to decline those cases.
We don’t usually decline, of course. We do the work, at a fraction of the fees that Steven (entirely properly) charges his clients.

But, for the reasons set out in this post, we are now saying no. No to new cases that don’t fairly reflect the work we do. thesecretbarrister.com/2022/04/11/why…
Read 5 tweets
The Secret Barrister Profile picture
Jun 14
Some lawyers have argued in support of the government’s actions.

Other lawyers have argued in support of the rights of those affected.

All have done their professional duty to their client, irrespective of personal or political belief.

All are essential to the rule of law.
Tomorrow, one set of these lawyers will be attacked by government ministers.

The Prime Minister and Home Secretary will denigrate them as “lefty activists” who “abet criminals”.

MPs will accuse them of having “blood on their hands”.

This is an attack on the rule of law itself.
The lawyers who, tomorrow, will have their personal safety jeopardised by the ugly, self-serving populism of the Prime Minister and his servile cabinet, are the same cadre of “lefty lawyers” who @BorisJohnson went crawling to when he was accused of criminal offences.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(