Today, we sued on behalf of a University of South Florida professor, student, and student group. The suit challenges politicians' attempt to prohibit certain discussions of race and sex in higher ed.
We must protect professors' ability to teach and students’ ability to learn.
Sam Rechek doesn't want the government to dictate what conversations can happen in college classes.
That’s why he’s fighting censorship with a lawsuit against Florida’s unconstitutional Stop WOKE Act.
👉suppresses viewpoints disfavored by Florida lawmakers
👉threatens millions in funding for universities that don’t crack down on faculty who "promote" an opinion on a government blacklist
👉all in the name of "individual freedom"!
Political leaders' absurd argument is that to protect free speech, the government must censor the people of Florida.
"Without the freedom to engage in vigorous and robust debate about important issues and contentious concepts, a college education is just an exercise in memorizing facts and repeating government-approved viewpoints," said FIRE's @adamsteinbaugh.
That's not freedom or education.
The law unlawfully regulates discussions of advantages of a race or sex, unconscious biases, and whether virtues like hard work and racial colorblindness are racist.
In restricting what ideas may be considered in college, Florida’s leaders ran headlong into the First Amendment.
The law is stuffed to the gills with vague language that leaves professors unsure which lessons are government-approved and which could result in punishment or termination.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, FIRE and @CollegeInsights released the third annual College Free Speech Rankings, ranking the speech climates of more than 200 of America’s largest and most prestigious campuses from top (@UChicago 👍) to bottom (@Columbia 👎). /1
This is the largest survey on student free expression ever conducted, adding almost 45,000 voices to the national conversation about campus speech freedom and … 𝗪𝗘 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗖𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗘𝗗. /2
Our report finds that many of those college voices surveyed are afraid to speak out on campus. /3
Today, FIRE called on the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center to drop its threat of litigation against NeuroClastic, a small non-profit that advocates for autistic people, after it published research criticizing the center’s use of electric-shock devices on autistic people. /1
“I was terrified when I got a letter from the Judge Rotenberg Center’s most notorious lawyer,” said NeuroClastic founder and CEO Terra Vance. “But the autistic people at the Judge Rotenberg Center cannot defend themselves — so we will.” /2
In our letter to the Rotenberg Center we make clear that its threatened defamation claims against NeuroClastic are meritless. /3
DEI initiatives are trending in higher ed as universities debate how to best serve their students. But what if faculty were told there’s a certain way they 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 to talk about, teach, and promote DEI — or else? It’s happening now @uoregon. 🧵 /1
FIRE is calling on the University of Oregon to stop requiring current and prospective faculty to submit statements endorsing and demonstrating how they’ve advanced the university’s narrow, politicized conception of “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” /2
UO is “committed to antiracism and other forms of anti-oppression” — but the First Amendment protects faculty from being forced to to promote any political framework — whether its anti-communism, individualism, patriotism ... or, yes, DEI. /3
With Roe overturned, some states are rushing to criminalize not only abortion — but 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 about abortion.
Here’s what you need to know. 🧵
2/ Legislators in South Carolina wasted no time introducing a bill that would make it a 𝗙𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗬 to “knowingly or intentionally aid, abet, or conspire” with another person to obtain an abortion.
3/ In other words, sharing information about obtaining an abortion — even, seemingly, a legal abortion in another state — with the knowledge that such information might be put to use 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill student government president issued an order this month cutting off executive branch funding “to any individual, business, or organization” that advocates for pro-life causes.
Yesterday, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression called on the UNC Chapel Hill student government to rescind the order and commit to distributing funds in a viewpoint-neutral manner.
“A student government should represent the entire student body, not abuse its power by seeking to censor classmates with opposing views,” said FIRE attorney Zach Greenberg.
After an unwarranted 122-day investigation into political speech, Georgetown Law finally reinstated @ishapiro on Thursday.
Today, he resigned.
2/ RESIGNATION LETTER: “You told me when we met last week that you want me to be successful in my new role and that you will ‘have my back.’ But instead, you’ve painted a target on my back such that I could never do the job I was hired for…”
3/ Georgetown was correct to reinstate Shapiro, but its initiation of an investigation transgressed its purported commitment to “the untrammeled expression of ideas and information.”
And it punted whether it would protect future free speech by reinstating him on a technicality.