Gen Zaluzhny, Ukraine's Commander-in-Chief of Armed Forces, published an article with his vision for how Ukraine should fight the russian invaders in the course of 2023.
It contains several crucial messages for 🇺🇦 politicians and int'l partners.
[Thread] ukrinform.ua/rubric-ato/356…
1/ Zaluzhny's key point: the source of russia's confidence in this war is its feeling of impunity, which is produced by russia's ability to strike Ukraine deep into its territory without a proper response. It is therefore crucial to address that sense of impunity on russia's part
2/ Zaluzhny emphasizes that upgrading Ukrainian weapons with Western arms is necessary but it is not enough.
He says it is paramount to develop and produce high-tech arms systems inside Ukraine, including those with long-reach capabilities, jointly with international partners.
3/ Zaluzhny stresses that, once Ukraine acquires such capabilities, it will have a massive deterrent effect on russia: "a comprehensive acquisition of [long-range] weapons systems should become the game-changer that one dreams of".
4/ Zaluzhny points out 2 factors that influence Western military support: (1) lack of understanding of the true scale of the war and its huge resource toll; and (2) a "direct" threat of russia using tactical nuclear weapons which will jeopardize entire Europe.
5/ Zaluzhny's message on russia's use of nuclear arms is crystal clear: "even nuclear strikes will not allow russia to break Ukraine's will to resist". But he sees a possibility of the involvement of major powers in a "limited" nuclear conflict as a result of such a scenario.
6/ Zaluzhny's message to Ukrainian politicians is hard to miss: to win this war, prepare for the long run in terms of proper planning, boosting industrial capacities and securing international assistance.
7/ Gen Zaluzhny's vision of the strategic goal of 🇺🇦 in this war is the defeat of russia's armed forces, which will make the latter unable to continue waging the war.
How: Ukraine's several successive - or, "ideally simultaneous" - counter-attacks during 2023.
[END of thread]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Good morning, folks.
Today, I want to talk about why tactical medicine is so important in this war against the russian aggression, and why I am so concerned with the issue of medical supplies for Ukraine's army. #ProtectUkrainianDefenders
Individual first-aid kits (IFAKs) of russians are a perfect reflection of this country's complete contempt of human life, even their own soldiers. This russian IFAK consists of little more than an outdated Esmarch bandage that may be worthless w/ wear&tear
Ukraine, however, massively invested in combat medicine over past 8 years. Military training was revamped in line with Nato standards. Hundreds of civilian volunteers equip of our soldiers with good gear.
Photo: @sector_m14 trains soldiers to use a tourniquet & tamponade a wound
3/ ❗️I discussed these needs with servicemen from legendary 93rd Brigade of 🇺🇦 Armed Forces.
Here's what they wrote to me:
➕Commander of the artillery unit: “Thank you for help! Together to the victory”.
➕A combat medic: “Everything is right on that list”.
How has Europe responded to #ArmUkraineNow? Short data analysis [THREAD].
Alas, some EU countries, inc. France🇫🇷 and Germany🇩🇪, have armed russia *more* over the past 8 years than Ukraine now.
Yes, despite EU sanctions slapped in 2014 after russia invaded UA for the first time
1/ France sent 10 times more weapons to russia (>1bn euro) in 2014-2020 than it has to Ukraine since large-scale war began.
Sources:
- France’s national reports on arms exports in 2014-20 (sipri.org/databases/nati…)
- gov’t statement on UA aid: lefigaro.fr/conjoncture/la…
2/ Germany appears to have sent far less weapons to Ukraine (since Feb'22) than it has exported to russia in 2014-20.
Sources: Germany’s gov't reports on arms exports in 2014-20 (sipri.org/databases/nati…), own calculations of military aid value to UA based on open sources.
There is one issue that I've been putting off discussing here on Twitter, but it's better late than never.
The issue is the level and breath of expertise on Ukraine in the EU. 1/4
2/4 For the past 8 years, since Russia started a "smaller-scale" war on Ukraine, most EU countries have failed to grow institutional expertise on Ukraine's economy, politics and military. Such experts at academic institutions & think-tanks were rare and marginalized from policy.
Poland is an obvious exception: it has excellent expertise at think-tanks and universities. But it is not enough for an EU-wide policy development, esp'ly given the magnitude of challenges we are facing: Ukraine's economic reconstruction, EU integration and strengthening defence.
One thing that very few people have pointed out about Ukraine is how its state has continued to provide essential services even under severe disruptions created by Russia's invasion — and even more, how quickly it has adapted to this new reality. A couple of examples.
(1) Ukrainian Railways have not only continued to transport passengers across the country but also launched quick evacuation routes from the areas most affected by Russia's aggression.
(2) Ukraine's healthcare system, which has undergone a major reform since 2014, continues to reimburse critical medicines to patients via an innovative e-ordering system. Many pharmacies in cities have closed but electronic lists of working ones started to circulate online fast.