Johnson’s government was casually corrupt. Truss’s is systematically corrupt. She has chosen a cabinet that listens to the money, not the people. Her advisers come from dark money thinktanks: covertly-funded lobby groups, promoting the interests of oligarchs and corporations.🧵
Johnson was louche, lazy, venal, dishonest. He would strike any deal, however odious, to secure his position. But Truss and her entourage are fanatically devoted to one aim: ensuring that the oligarchs get what they want, regardless of the cost the rest of us might bear.
Johnson was disgusting, Truss is terrifying. Cold, shallow, mannered, stiff, but with the glitter of absolute certainty in pursuit of the most damaging policies imaginable in a nominal democracy.
She'll go as far as electoral politics allow in transferring wealth from the poor to the rich, in opening the floodgates for pollution and greenhouse gases, in dismembering the NHS, in persecuting asylum seekers and scapegoating others to distract from the impact of her policies.
The oligarchs she serves are insatiable. There is no point at which they’ll say: “we’ve got what we want now, thanks”. Everything must be pressed into their service. Thanks to the Pollution Paradox, the politics that serve them must become ever more corrupt and extreme.
You might think this cannot continue. The people will throw out these creeps at the next election. But if there is one thing the past 12 years have taught us, it’s that the billionaire press can induce people to vote for those who break their bones.
Starmer seems to think he needs only sit and wait. It might work. He might win simply by not being Liz Truss. But it’s a dangerous tactic. When people perceive that politics cannot meet their needs, they either give up altogether or are drawn to anti-politics.
You think it couldn’t happen here. But I do not find it impossible to envisage a victory by the far right in the UK, swarming into the policy vacuum left by corruption on one side and timidity on the other.
When inequality becomes extreme, those who seek power have one of two options: to contest it or to distract from it. The process of distraction – pointing to scapegoats and fomenting culture wars – is well under way. It paves the way for fascism.
History shows that when people see no prospect of relief, and when the machinations of power are successfully hidden, they become highly susceptible to the transfer of blame. They seek meaning and purpose in identities defined against others. Others who have done them no harm.
Who will be blamed this time? All the usual suspects. Muslims, Jews, black and brown people, asylum seekers, the left, unions, protesters, LGBTQ people, Gypsies, Roma and Travellers. Blame will spread like a cancer, and will attach to anyone except the authors of our misfortunes.
And remember: we are in the midst of a series of crises: the climate and ecological emergency, impossible rents and bills, the collapse of public services, the Russian invasion, the rise of global hunger ... None will be addressed by this government. Yet more wasted years.
This is why we need an Opposition that offers a real and inspiring alternative. We need hope: a positive vision of a better world, rather than a slightly ameliorated version of the current shitstorm. Starmer needs either to step up or to make way for someone who will.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everything about this conspiracy theory is false. But never mind, let's give it 11,000 likes. 1. The Guardian asked me to cover a different topic, but I asked to write about this one, as I thought it was more important. In other words, the initiative was entirely mine.🧵
2. I have no idea what Gates’s view of this topic is. But if he has one, I suspect it’s hostile to the line I take. Why? Because his companies have sought to buy cattle ranches, to add to his portfolio of farmland.
3. The Guardian is not funded by Gates himself. It receives a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which is independently administered. The grant is for reporting on global health and development topics. Any funded articles are marked as such.
Do you live in a freeport? Since rings of up to 75km wide were drawn around them, without consulting us, many millions of us now do. Yet trying to discover exactly what this means is like pulling teeth. In today's column, I attempt to work it out. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Everything about freeports is undemocratic - in fact they are a direct assault on democracy. They are also, as I've been finding out, astonishingly opaque and unaccountable. And they put lives and places at risk in ways that have not been properly explained to us.
The outer boundaries of freeports now encircle a large part of the country. Check this list to see if you live in one.
When our environmental predicament is so vast and so obvious, why are so few eminent and powerful people prepared to confront it, or even seriously to discuss it?
Here’s a thread that seeks to explain the Great Silence.
🧵
However vast and obvious an issue might be, if acknowledging it conflicts with major economic interests, it will be marginalised. Before the 1770s, Europeans who opposed slavery were a tiny minority. Even most of the great Enlightenment philosophers either ignored or justified it
Eminent thinkers either accepted slavery as part of the natural order, or went to extraordinary lengths to justify it, apparently unembarrassed by the ridiculous arguments required. Preposterous theories were developed to justify Business As Usual.
Also, I'm not entirely sure that FMP is appropriate in this situation.
It might seem shocking that a farmer vehemently objects to the idea that everyone on Earth should be fed. But it points to the essentially performative nature of his variety of farming: amazingly unproductive, sprawling over a vast land area, entirely dependent on public money.
As one of many people who was attacked by him on Infowars, triggering yet another wave of hatred and threats (though *nothing* by comparison to what the Sandy Hook parents have undergone) I take a grim satisfaction in seeing Alex Jones being held to accunt for his lies.
But I take no satisfaction at all in seeing how his lies and conspiracy theories have seeped into parts of the left, helping cement a red-brown alliance on issues ranging from support for Bashar al-Assad to anti-vaxx woo.
Some of those who claim to confront the establishment are just as ruthless in exploiting gullible people as the elites they rail against.
We have now had 40 years of neoliberalism, which claims, above all else, to deliver freedom of choice. Yet the great majority of the world’s people have almost no choice over the work they do and the lives they lead.🧵
This is not to say that neoliberalism has failed. On the contrary, it has succeeded magnificently. The very rich now enjoy greater freedom than at any time since the pre-democratic era. They have freedom from regulations, taxes, trade unions, democracy itself.
This freedom is exercised at other people’s expense. The trick, as always, is to persuade us that what is good for the very rich is good for everyone. Their freedom is our captivity.