"there's quite a bit of environmental regulatory reform and deregulation that needs to happen across our bureaucracy in order to actually deploy the technologies that we just spent $400 billion subsidizing"
This, as I've written repeatedly, is a common problem w industrial policy: Advocates say IP is needed to fix "market failures" - in markets severely hamstrung by bad govt policy. And when the IP (subsidies/tariffs/etc) is deployed, it runs smack-dab into those govt restrictions.
The obvs order of operations: 1) fix the bad govt policies; 2) deploy market-based policy improvements; 3) see where *real* mkt failures remain; 4) THEN subsidize/etc in the least distortionary way possible.