Capital Daily Profile picture
Sep 8 33 tweets 17 min read
Mayor Lisa Helps is the first to deliver remarks on the Missing Middle initiative.

"This is a 2020 action in our strategic plan and it behooves us to finish our work,” she says #MMHI #yyjpoli
She then quotes Wayne Gretzky: You need to go where the puck will be not where the puck is, if you want to score a goal

Goal Victoria is trying to score with #MMHI is "more housing for more people in our community," Helps says #yyjpoli
Helps also ties in incoming provincial legislation to accelerate housing development, as well as federal funding to support housing development

Returning to hockey metaphor, passing #MMHI today would put Victoria "where the puck is when it's passed to us down the ice" #yyjpoli
"Zoning is one of our most critical, most local, most city-led tools that we have in our toolbox," Helps says, touching on comments council should "stay in its lane" on policy.

Says young people in Victoria can't even imagine owning a home with current land use policies #yyjpoli
Coun. @MarianneAlto is next to speak, having 2nded motion on 3rd reading of relevant bylaw amendments.

She notes wide range of perspectives aired during public hearing, some conflicting.

If #MMHI vote is booted to next council, could be up to a year before it's considered again
Council can pass #MMHI, giving it ability to shape city's growth "or we defer and wait for the province to step in," Alto says.

She believes BC gov is "serious and that they will impose a growth plan in which Victorians will have no say" via expected legislation #yyjpoli
Alto plans to vote in favour, saying #MMHI is "essentially a 2 year trial run" with built in review #yyjpoli
Coun. @Stephen_Andrew is next. He notes tenor of debate "appeared ageist and appropriate from all sides" at times.

Says his decision on #MMHI is based on what he heard and lived experience, including living in public housing, "bout of homelessness" and now having a home #yyjpoli
Andrew will not support #MMHI vote today.

"If I'm honored to be at this council table in October, together with the new council, I will ensure that we bring a plan forward that addresses housing concerns and delivers solutions within 1st month of its mandate," he says #yyjpoli
Coun. Geoff Young is next, says #MMHI will "produce a decline in the quality of life for many residents" and will result in "upheaval" for many existing renters #yyjpoli
#MMHI has "a lot of shoulds in there as opposed to musts" when it comes to design guidelines, Coun. Young says. Concerned at least some details will be hashed out by staff, council and developers, rather than in public #yyjpoli
Young objects to suggestion lack of housing causes worker shortages (coffee shops, drywalling and ferries cited as examples during public hearing).

"What really has to happen is that we have to pay more for a lot of the jobs that have traditionally been low wage" #yyjpoli
Coun. @JeremyLoveday attempts to propose 2 amendments to policy direction to staff in #MMHI

Helps moves for council to shift to considering policy issues, which could inform coun. votes, to consider Loveday's amendments #yyjpoli
Loveday amendment 1: For #MMHI applications on "sites with heritage value, but without heritage protections, staff be directed to work with applicants to 1st consider house conversion for heritage infill prior to considering a missing middle project that would require demolition"
This amendment (motion arising) passes #yyjpoli
2nd from Loveday: That council direct staff to conduct the review of the missing middle program after 18 months rather than two years, including a new independent financial analysis and the consideration of adding more affordability requirements #MMHI #yyjpoli
2 year review to far out but there is not likely to be enough data after 1 years, Loveday says. A "2nd opinion" financial analysis could incorporate economic shifts happening quickly right now, he adds #yyjpoli #MMHI
It's "really quite elegant compromise," according to Alto, who 2nd'd Loveday's motion.

Sounds like most councillors want to respond to this motion #yyjpoli #mmhi
Andrew says the motion is "window dressing" to try and get #MMHI passed, is skeptical staff will be able to "bring back something of value" to council for consideration in 18 months #yyjpoli
Coun. @deardubow follows up on Andrew's questions about similar densification policies in Vancouver, Kelowna (more limited than #MMHI).

Dubow wants to know where those policies are at and whether any city in BC has passed policies similar to missing middle #yyjpoli
Dubow does not support the motion.

Coun. Isitt wants to vote in favour, as he is interested in putting #MMHI "on as short a leash as possible." He attempts amendment to shorten eval period to 1yr bu it gets no 2nd #yyjpoli
Coun. @sarahpottsvic also supportive of a shorter evaluation period and additional financial analysis on #MMHI

"We need some Victoria specific data," she says #yyjpoli
Coun. Charlayne Thornton-Joe likes extra financial analysis, is unsure about shortened review timeline.

Raises possibility of 0 applications under #MMHI, in time for shorter review

Staff suggest no building may have been done but apps will likely be received #yyjpoli
Thornton-Joe moves amendment that would have staff provide "short briefing" to council on #MMHI impacts after 6 months.

Isitt 2nds, Dubow does not think relevant data will be available in 6 months #yyjpoli
Helps is in favour of T-Js amendment, says whatever info is available could be a valuable "temperature check" for council.

Also expresses support for Loveday's motion, emphasizes she's hopeful vote on #MMHI bylaws will happen today #yyjpoli
Amendment passes, so does Loveday's motion.

Back to 3rd reading of #MMHI bylaw amendments, with Loveday still speaking #yyjpoli
Loveday pushes back against narrative there was not enough consultation on #MMHI, says the policy involved more public consultation than any other land-use policy he's seen during his time on council #yyjpoli
A lot of other great ideas to address housing affordability came up during #MMHI hearings, Loveday says - garden and secondary suite initiatives, Airbnb regulations, etc.

There was opposition to existing garden suite policy too, Loveday says, along similar lines to MMHI #yyjpoli
#MMHI would be "a meaningful addition" to tools city has to deliver needed housing, even if it does not "deliver truly affordable housing," Loveday says

He'll vote for the policy #yyjpoli
Coun. Ben Isitt tries another amendment, which also finds no 2nd-er.

He's proposing another one #yyjpoli
"I don't think missing middle is beyond redemption," Isitt says, but "absent affordability" he can't support #MMHI.

Proposed amendment would quadruple cash-in-lieu of affordability requirements for developers but, once again, there's no 2nd-er #yyjpoli
And with Isitt halfway through his time, council breaks for lunch! Back at 1:30PM to resume #MMHI deliberations, and with Isitt mulling another amendment #yyjpoli

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Capital Daily

Capital Daily Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CapitalDailyVic

Sep 8
And we're back! Coun. Isitt with an amendment, this one 2nd-ed by Alto.

This would double cash-in-lieu contributions from developers who do not deliver on affordability options for #MMHI projects #yypoli Image
Amendment carries and Isitt has another one, this one lowering the height of #MMHI buildings to 8.5m for a flat roof, 9.5m for other roof types #yyjpoli Image
This amendment also passes with Andrew and Alto opposed #yyjpoli #MMHI
Read 15 tweets
Sep 6
Contentious Selkirk five-storey gets approval 🏗

Esquimalt council unanimously approved a zoning bylaw amendment to allow TLA Developments to build a 46-unit five-storey at 815 and 825 Selkirk.

📸 815-825 Selkirk rendering from TLA proposal package. Image
This proposal was given its 3rd reading after a public hearing in June, at which Coun. Jane Vermeullen called it one of the most difficult deliberations in her career. "It’s definitely a controversial development," Vermeulen said at the time.
Most nearby homeowners who shared their views at the June hearing were against the project moving forward as-is, mainly due to its size and lack of affordable housing components.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(