Share this page!

Peter Strzok Profile picture
Twitter logo
Sep 9 • 5 tweets • 2 min read
Trump’s lawsuit against me and many others just dismissed. The Court had some things to say.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Habba-quality law
Tiktin-quality law
To borrow @AshaRangappa_’s phrase, hoo-boy
A final note, a reminder how hard Trump tried to get this failed lawsuit in front of Judge Cannon.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Peter Strzok

Peter Strzok Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @petestrzok

Peter Strzok Profile picture
Sep 7
🧵 with an investigator’s read of last night’s WP story detailing some of the material seized from MAL. What can we know – and not know – from a careful reading?

1/

washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
The article repeatedly describes its (plural) sources as “people familiar with the matter” and “people familiar with the search.” But never once “govt sources,” “intel officials,” or “law enforcement officials.”

Doesn’t exclude USG sources, but leaves open non-govt sources. 2/
“Nuclear capabilities” doesn’t necessarily mean “nuclear weapons.” It could describe countries at various points on the path of seeking nuc weapons.

We don’t know enough to know which country. Trump’s interests are wide enough to implicate several. Speculation is guesswork. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Peter Strzok Profile picture
Aug 31
“The government also developed evidence that government records were likely concealed and removed from the Storage Room and that efforts were likely taken to obstruct the government’s investigation.”

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
That’s a whole lotta redacted compartments after “TOP SECRET”

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Look, this is all really bad, but some highlights in here.

HCS-O refers to HUMINT Control System-Operations, “used to protect exceptionally fragile and unique IC clandestine HUMINT operations and methods”

sgp.fas.org/othergov/intel…
Read 5 tweets
Peter Strzok Profile picture
Aug 12
scienter (noun)
sci • en • ter | \sī- 'en- ter\
1: knowledge of the nature of one's act or omission or of the nature of something in one's possession that is often a necessary element of an offense
also: intent to engage in particular especially criminal conduct
Read 4 tweets
Peter Strzok Profile picture
Aug 10
I used both consent and search warrants dozens of times over the course of my career to recover classified govt info - but never a subpoena. Let’s talk subpoenas and why they’re not used to recover classified material from those not authorized to have it.

🧵

/1
I’m talking here about information produced by the USG containing national defense information and appropriately classified in accordance with EO 13526. Not someone’s after-the-fact book, or classified information in a news article.

archives.gov/isoo/policy-do…

2/
Someone not authorized to possess it, in this thread, refers to former President Trump. Presidents to not “get” security clearances. They gain access to classified info by virtue of their election, and are the USG’s ultimate classification (and declassification) authority.

3/ Lookit the North Korean missile launch
Read 12 tweets
Peter Strzok Profile picture
Aug 6
No, Senator, I disagree. It was not a hoax.

As long as the question is asked, that answer needs to be said clearly and precisely by those in a position to know.
It was not a hoax

It was not a hoax

persuasion.community/p/the-real-hoax
Read 5 tweets
Peter Strzok Profile picture
Jul 16
Take a moment to think about the staggering counterintelligence issues in the crazy Dec 18, 2020 WH meeting. A thread.

In the Oval Office, people advocated Trump illegitimately hold on to power, including using the military to seize voting machines.

That group included: (/1)
Mike Flynn, who who was paid by an organ of Russian state media to travel to Moscow to attend a dinner where he was seated next to Putin.

Flynn later plead guilty to lying to the FBI about conversations he had with the Russian Ambassador about election interference. (/2)
Patrick Byrne, one of several men once in an intimate relationship with convicted Russian agent Marina Butina.

Byrne gave money to Butina after her return to Russia, where she ran for the Duma, hounded Navalny, and supported the invasion of Ukraine. (/3)

businessinsider.com/pro-trump-form…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(