Recently, I've been struck by how much online career advice is overly personal (do these 3 things I did) or political (all hard work is a capitalist con).
So I wrote down 5 ideas that've made the biggest impression on me.
1) "Don't take the job you want to *tell* people you do. Take the job you want to do."
@JamesFallows told me this circa 2013. I've never forgotten it. It's the chestnut I've repeated to more people than any other piece of work advice I've ever received.
2) On a similar theme of "work is mostly about time":
Life is roughly 4,000 weeks long. Your career is 80,000 hours, or, sequentially, roughly 500 total lived weeks; or one-eighth of life. That's too big a thing to not take seriously and too small to take too seriously.
3) Explore, then exploit.
The paper that's made the biggest impression on my attitude toward work & creativity is Dashun Wang's on the explore-exploit sequence. I'm a huge proponent of role-switching to find the unique combo of skills that you can synthesize and specialize in.
4) People should be more honest with themselves about how much professional success matters to them.
I don't think career ambition is a universal virtue. It's more like a taste that varies among people. That's okay. If it's your taste, own it without judgment or self-deception.
5) Flow, via the psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, is probably the most true concept in the field of work psychology.
We feel happiest when our “body or mind is stretched to its limits in a VOLUNTARY effort to accomplish something DIFFICULT and WORTHWHILE.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This, while perfectly defensible on the merits, is also pretty gloomy. So I also want to point to 3 ways life expectancy is likely to be much better for Americans in the coming years and decades.
I wrote about a demographic mystery: Why Americans of every age, at every income level, are more likely than residents of similarly rich countries to die—from guns, drugs, cars, Omicron, and even our own bodies
In the 1980s, the U.S. had pretty similar life expectancy to most rich European countries.
Since then, we've fallen way behind.
The reasons are diverse: We have more guns, more car accidents, more overdoses, and less health care access.
In this piece, I talk about two pieces of an Abundance Agenda that could raise life expectancy—which might be the most important statistic in the world.
I wrote about the biggest differences between personal finance bestsellers and personal finance conclusions from economics—and what the difference says about how people value time vs. money
Many personal finance bestsellers encourage people to develop an early savings habit and stock away 10% of income, even when earnings are pinched: i.e., to "smooth" savings
Economic theory prefers stable spending levels across time: i.e., smoothing consumption
This reflects a difference in strategy and philosophy.
Personal finance bestsellers are trying to overcome readers' low willpower. They're optimized for psychology.
But consumption smoothing prizes a more existential reality: There is more to life than an optimized savings rate
I'm prepared for mad comments, but best as I can see, the "new catastrophic national shortage" is neither new, nor national, nor a catastrophic shortage
Three important caveats to get out of the way
1. Staffing *some* teachers in *some* districts (not to mention BEING a teacher in many districts) has been hard, for years. 2. Our national teacher data sucks. 3. Every public school narrative these days is an ideological minefield.
But there are also three big reasons to doubt the emerging narrative of a sudden national teacher shortage crisis.
1) There's very little hard evidence from the teacher turnover data that we have of a sudden increase in quits.
I talked to @CKlosterman about
- how hating things became high-status in the 21st century
- the death of the monoculture
- how social media turns us into anti-fans
- why cultural historians will obsess over the year 2003
So, I asked @CKlosterman: Given his expertise in the 1990s and the history of TV, when did he think the modern phenomenon of anti-fandom really take off?
He picked 2003—the year Reality TV producers discovered that disdain was a surer path to making a hit than shared admiration.
So, I thought: Is there any way to find survey data that validates 2003 as a turning point in national admiration?
Well, guess what.
From 1950 - 2002, every POTUS but Ford had a full year of 55% approval or higher. But it hasn't happened once since ... 2003.
Yes, Americans (and especially rich Americans) are living longer. And yes, healthspans are increasing: see the extended primes in sports—eg, LeBron, Brady, and Nadal.
But the avg age of achievement and power in the U.S. is getting older much, much faster than lifespans.
As I discuss with @tedgioia on my podcast today, something very strange in happening in pop culture.
Music listening is shifting quite rapidly to older music—at the same time that avg top-line actors are getting older by leaps and bounds