I distinguish applications of VoLL btwn: (1) cost-benefit analysis for centralized reliability-enhancing infrastructure investments & (2) decentralized demand rationing during electric supply shortages (like what’s discussed in @California_ISO this week).
Power outages resulting from supply shortage can often be mitigated by demand-side solutions like dynamic pricing or demand-response programs (and we need more of them!), which only need loose connection to VoLL estimation
However, what about all of the other types of power outages? Photo: City of Concord NC following Hurricane Irma
Research by colleagues of mine @BerkeleyLabEMP have shown that distribution system outages (NOT the supply shortages that we were experiencing this week @California_ISO) cause >90% of outages on the system. Think damage to T&D by weather events (…or squirrels🐿️)
T&D infrastructure investments that make the grid more resilient to factors like extreme weather conditions are not informed by dynamic pricing / demand response. Decision makers use VoLL estimation in order to do those cost-benefit tradeoffs!
However it is HARD to quantify benefits of better grid reliability. I review the various methods applied to do such quantification – and introduce new discussions on how we might use adoption of distributed energy resources for a “revealed preference” VoLL quantification approach
BUT I don’t identify any silver bullets to quantification. I DO provide a compilation of various VoLL estimates by method that have appeared in the literature over the last 40-50 years…As you see, there is a wide range
Though the VoLL is often shown as a point estimate, in reality it is multi-dimensional, i.e. vary by end-user (e.g. industrial vs. residential), end-use (e.g. manufacturing vs. lighting vs. HVAC), consumption context (e.g. community exposure, outage timing/duration/notification)
Such heterogeneity can make it difficult to perform an optimization or cost-benefit analysis that tries to tradeoff the costs of power outages with the costs of generation, transmission, and/or distribution investments across society.
I conclude by arguing that given this difficulty, cost-effectiveness analysis which sets a reliability target (think the 1-in-10 year standard) should remain an important tool for decision makers. Read the paper for the more nuanced narrative!
Much thanks to my PhD advisors @BorensteinS, Duncan Callaway, and Meredith Fowlie for teaching and sharing their wisdom and expertise along the way! Read the full paper: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you like to get wonky with electricity rate design, this paper (and thread) may be for you. We’ll have it all: fixed charges, grid defection, solar, storage, reliability, and maps to tell the story.
1/9
Paper title: “Should I stay or should I go? The importance of electricity rate design for grid defection” out in Applied Energy.
Currently, it is common for utilities to recover a substantial portion of fixed costs through setting variable charges above marginal costs which has adverse implications for efficiency by under-incentivizing consumption (e.g. electrification of heating or transportation)…
3/9